Skip to content

ScienceReports disagree4 publishers3 min readPublished

University of Colorado ink lets light hide a tattoo while its pigment stays in the skin

University of Colorado Boulder engineers made three-colour tattoo inks that UV light switches on and bright light switches off, in a Matter & Light study. Because the pigment stays in the skin, the ink hides a tattoo without removing it, and its safety in people has not been established.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying University of Colorado ink lets light hide a tattoo while its pigment stays in the skin
Photo: livescience.com

What happened

  • The inks put blue, magenta and yellow photochromic dyes inside nanoparticles of PMMA, a plastic already used in medical implants and dermal fillers.
  • A 365-nanometre ultraviolet LED switches the colours on in about two to three seconds, and they last hours to days under indoor light, Bruns told Live Science.
  • All three colour channels stayed switchable in the skin for between 1.4 and 2.2 years, according to Live Science.
  • New Scientist reports 16 clearly distinguishable colours and at least 300 shades, though the palette has no white and no true cyan.
  • PhotoTat is not yet offered in tattoo parlours; Bruns's group hopes to refine the designs over the coming years before making the inks available.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • contradiction Live Science says bright outdoor sun erases the colours in seconds, while New Scientist says wearers need sunscreen to stop sunlight switching them on; which is right decides whether a hidden tattoo stays hidden outdoors.
  • constraint A clinic-only mark would be switched on at every visit, and the blue dye's slow photo-degradation into a permanent purplish tint works against a mark meant to be invisible in between.
  • exposure Hiding a PhotoTat tattoo leaves its dye in the dermis, so any future toxicity finding about these dyes applies to everyone already tattooed, whether their design is switched on or off.

"The tattoo is permanent, but its appearance is not," Carson Bruns, an associate professor of biomedical engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder, told New Scientist [26][1]. By his account a PhotoTat tattoo goes in like any other: pigment particles pushed into the dermis with a needle, using the same machines and methods, and they stay there [28]. Light changes the dye's molecular structure, and with it the colour [7]. He described the cycle this way: "ultraviolet light writes the colour in, bright visible light erases it, and the cycle can be repeated" [8].

The "erased" tattoo in Live Science's account is a transparent dye still sitting in the skin [7][27]. Nothing is removed. "If you never want to see it again, just never turn it on again," Bruns said [29].

The medical case starts with radiotherapy, where many patients get small tattoos to help doctors guide the radiation beams [9]. "They're not beautiful, and they become a permanent reminder of a traumatic experience," Bruns told Phys.org [10]. "With PhotoTat, we could turn an involuntary medical tattoo into something that's only visible to the doctor when you go into the clinic, and then it can be invisible the rest of the time," he said [11]. Live Science reports that similar marks could potentially be switched on during surgery and hidden afterwards [12].

The human skin described in the coverage is Bruns's own [33]. He has tested every version of the inks on himself, according to Live Science [13], and he told New Scientist that his fish-scale PhotoTat tattoo has caused no known side effects in two years [14]. "After over two years in my skin, I haven't seen any obvious fading yet," he said [15]. His results, from one self-experimenter with no comparison group, show the dyes keep switching in living skin but say nothing about how often they cause reactions across many people. New Scientist reports the technology has also been tested on silicon [16].

The shell is PMMA, which Bruns says is non-toxic and has a long history in permanent biomedical implants [17]. The dyes inside it are the open question. Bruns said the toxicity of the colour-changing dyes is unknown, though so is the toxicity of most tattoo pigments [18]. Phys.org reports that Bruns has not yet determined whether the inks are safe for people [19]. Signe Bedsted Clemmensen of the University of Southern Denmark said tattoo ink in the body is a foreign substance that has been linked to cancer, whether it is visible or not [20]. "Therefore, many of the same health considerations and concerns that apply to traditional tattoo ink are also likely to apply to invisible tattoo ink," she said [21]. New Scientist notes that red tattoo ink caused one man to lose all his hair and stop sweating earlier this year, and that tattooing has been linked to localised damage to the immune system [23].

I think the cosmetic ink is the nearer prospect. A clinic-only mark needs everything the cosmetic one does, plus colours that behave the same after many rounds of switching. Before either reaches the public, New Scientist reports, extensive safety studies still have to be carried out [24].

What to watch

  • Results from the safety studies New Scientist says must come before PhotoTat reaches the public, especially toxicity data for the dyes themselves.
  • Any test of switchable alignment marks in radiotherapy or surgical patients, the use Bruns has proposed.
  • A fix for the blue dye's photo-degradation, or a direct measurement of whether sunlight switches the colours on or off in skin.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption5
Hype gap+25
Incentives60
Confidence60

Perspective Coverage

3 publishers
Builder
Builder 38%
Operator
Operator 48%
Investor
Investor 14%
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Carson Bruns, an associate professor of biomedical engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder, and colleagues developed tattoo inks that can be switched on and off with light, reported in a study in the journal Matter & Light.

  2. [2]

    Engineers led by Carson Bruns of the University of Colorado Boulder designed multicoloured tattoo inks that switch on and off with different kinds of light, described in a study in Matter & Light.

  3. [3]

    Inks developed by Carson Bruns at the University of Colorado can be turned on and off by exposing them to light.

Sources

4 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. livescience.com

    1 article · October 9, 2026

    Cool chemistry trick allows new tattoos to 'turn on and off'
  2. nature.com

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    Watch this invisible tattoo appear under UV light
  3. newscientist.com

    1 article · October 9, 2026

    Tattoos could be turned on and off with light
  4. phys.org

    1 article · October 9, 2026

    Light-responsive inks could make tattoos visible on demand, but safety remains unproven

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories