Skip to content

Science Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Young adults' pupils dilated every time they counted aloud and only once when they counted silently

Ryuta Kuwamizu's team reports in iScience that young adults' pupils dilated while counting aloud in all three experiments. Silent counting always produced smaller pupil changes, and their direction depended on the task.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AI Send a correction

Illustration accompanying Young adults' pupils dilated every time they counted aloud and only once when they counted silently
Generated illustration

What happened

  • Earlier brain imaging showed that inner speech activates some of the same language networks as speaking aloud, but whether the two raise arousal alike was unclear.
  • Healthy young adults completed a counting task in three conditions: resting, counting aloud and counting silently in their heads.
  • Each of three experiments used a different counting method: plain counting, number-noun phrases such as one cat, two cats, and step counting such as 1, 4, 7.
  • During silent counting, pupils constricted in the simple task, did not change in the number-noun task and dilated in step counting.

Why it matters

  • capability If pupils can stand in for self-report, researchers could study inner speech in infants and young children, according to the summary, and look at self-calming or motivating talk such as in sports.
  • constraint Any pupil-based claim about inner speech now has to name the counting task it was measured in, because the same silent activity gave three different readings.
  • contradiction The authors' summary line, lower arousal, is a comparison with overt speech. It does not place inner speech below rest, and in step counting the pupil data put it above.

The comparison is built on shared content. The aloud and silent conditions use the same counting tasks, and a rest condition sits beside them as a baseline [3]. That matters because inner speech cannot be observed directly, and earlier studies leaned largely on what participants said about their own thoughts [13]. A pupil measure sidesteps the report, and the authors treat it as a moment-to-moment index of arousal [2].

Across the three experiments the pattern is sharper for speaking aloud than for silence. Overt counting dilated pupils in three of three experiments, and silent counting did so in one of three [11]. That one was step counting, the task the source describes as requiring greater cognitive effort [12].

In our view, effort is the likeliest explanation for that dilation. But the experiments changed the counting method, and effort moved with it [4]. From the summary alone, the pupil could be following either.

The phys.org write-up does not report how many people took part or how large the pupil changes were, and it does not say how the authors separated arousal from the act of articulating. Speaking aloud adds more to a task than arousal, and the gap between overt and inner speech may include some of that.

The thing this doesn't tell you is how silent self-talk behaves outside counting. The summary raises self-calming and motivating talk, as in sports, as something the method could help study [15]. Participants in these experiments rested or counted [3].

What to watch

  • The full iScience paper's participant count and effect sizes, which the phys.org summary leaves out.
  • Whether the authors or others test a design that varies effort within a single counting rule, to see if silent dilation tracks effort.
  • Any pupil study of inner speech in infants or young children, the use the summary proposes but the experiments did not test.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+15
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence40
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Brain imaging studies have shown that inner speech activates some of the same language networks involved in speaking aloud, but it remained unclear whether inner and overt speech are associated with similar levels of brain arousal.

    Reported Supported Source: phys.org summary of the iScience studyView cited source
  2. [2]

    Researchers used pupil size as a noninvasive measure of moment-to-moment changes in arousal.

    Reported Supported Source: phys.org summary of the iScience studyView cited source
  3. [3]

    Healthy young adults performed a counting task under three conditions: rest (not counting or thinking about anything in particular), overt speech (counting aloud) and inner speech (counting silently in their heads).

    Reported Supported Source: phys.org summary of the iScience studyView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. phys.org

    1 article · October 15, 2026

    Pupil size reveals differences between speaking aloud and inner speech

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Loading related stories