Skip to content

InvestNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished

CFTC proposes crypto leverage rules under existing law after the CLARITY Act stalls

CFTC proposed two crypto leverage rules under existing law on October 5, 20 days after the CLARITY Act stalled 49-50 in the Senate. Until Congress acts, what counts as compliant for leveraged retail crypto will be set by CFTC rulemaking.

The Investor · Invest desk

How we use AISend a correction

What happened

  • CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said he was disappointed that Congress failed to advance the CLARITY Act, a bill meant to divide digital-asset oversight between the CFTC and the SEC.
  • Regulation Crypto Asset Transactions, or CTX, covers leveraged retail trading in crypto assets, where traders use borrowed money to take bigger positions than their own cash allows.
  • Regulation Crypto Asset Markets, or CAM, sets up a federal registration pathway for trading platforms, conditioned on safeguards that include proof-of-reserves.
  • The bill had passed the House in 2025 and moved through Senate committees earlier in 2026 before stalling on the September 15 procedural vote.

Why it matters

  • exposure A platform that builds its compliance around CTX and CAM can have both rules rewritten by the next commission, a risk a statute would have lowered.
  • cost Registration and proof-of-reserves are fixed costs that larger venues absorb more easily, and Cryptobriefing expects smaller operators to be squeezed out.
  • constraint Spot crypto trading stays outside the CFTC's reach until Congress acts, so the question of which agency is in charge, the one CLARITY was written to answer, remains open.

Both proposals rest on the Commodity Exchange Act, the law that already gives the CFTC oversight of commodity derivatives markets [5], and neither requires new authority from Congress [9]. The agency splits the problem in two: CTX covers the borrowed-money bet and CAM covers the venue [6][7]. Cryptobriefing's account does not include leverage limits, a comment deadline or an effective date for either rule.

The agency moved fast. The proposals came 20 days after the September 15 procedural vote [14]. Selig, 287 days into the chairmanship [15] and formerly of the SEC's Crypto Task Force [8], put them out alongside public criticism of lawmakers [1]. Cryptobriefing notes that open criticism of Congress is not a casual move for a sitting agency chair, and takes it as a measure of how much weight the CFTC had put on getting a statute [13].

Congress could revive CLARITY, and the CFTC's rules would then have to fit whatever split between the two agencies the statute draws [3]. The proposals could instead be finalized and become the working standard for leveraged retail crypto while the bill sits. Or a later commission could rewrite them [12]. We think the second is the likeliest near-term outcome. According to Cryptobriefing, the dispute that stalled the bill was over ethics provisions in particular [11]. A CFTC rulemaking on leverage does not touch that dispute.

The case against that view is the size of the margin. At 49-50 [2], one senator changing a vote would put a statute back ahead of the rulebook, and the CFTC's proposals would become an interim document.

Cryptobriefing also expects clearer rules to make some traders more comfortable with leveraged products [17]. If that brings volume onto registered platforms before the Senate returns to the bill, any statute will have to accommodate a rulebook already in use. We would be wrong if the reverse happens and large platforms hold off on CAM registration until the Senate acts. In that case the agency's standard would exist on paper, with few venues using it.

What to watch

  • Whether Senate leaders bring the CLARITY Act back for another procedural vote, where one changed vote on the 49-50 tally would put statute ahead of the CFTC's rules.
  • Whether the CFTC finalizes CTX and CAM before any Senate re-vote, which decides whether the rulebook or the statute sets the terms first.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence40
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+5
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence35
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    On October 5, 2026, CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig said he was disappointed that lawmakers failed to advance the CLARITY Act.

    ReportedSupportedSource: CryptobriefingView cited source
  2. [2]

    On September 15, 2026, the CLARITY Act stalled in the Senate on a 49-50 procedural vote, falling one vote short.

    ReportedSupportedSource: CryptobriefingView cited source
  3. [3]

    The CLARITY Act was built to draw a line between the CFTC and the SEC on digital assets, settling which federal agency is in charge.

    ReportedSupportedSource: CryptobriefingView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. cryptobriefing.com

    1 article · October 10, 2026

    CFTC Chairman Selig says he is disappointed in Congress over stalled crypto bill

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Loading related stories