Skip to content

ScienceNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished

Orange cats get their coat from a DNA deletion just ahead of the Arhgap36 gene

Stanford geneticist Greg Barsh and colleagues traced orange fur in cats to a 5-kilobase deletion in non-coding DNA just ahead of the Arhgap36 gene. The gap turned up in every orange cat they examined, evidence that the DNA controlling how strongly a gene is expressed can set a long-studied sex-linked trait.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Orange cats get their coat from a DNA deletion just ahead of the Arhgap36 gene
Photo: sciencealert.com

What happened

  • Skin cells that sprout orange fur make 13 times as much RNA from the Arhgap36 gene as skin cells from cats with no orange hair, the Stanford team found.
  • A second team, led by Kyushu University geneticist Hidehiro Toh, independently identified Arhgap36 as the gene behind orange fur.
  • The mutation sits on the X chromosome, so most orange cats are male and most females with orange fur show patchworks of colors.
  • On the rare occasions that a female carries the mutation on both X chromosomes, she grows as fully orange as any male.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • decision Gene hunts that begin with a change in a gene's activity have a documented case for sequencing the DNA around the gene, since the coding section Barsh's team checked first did not hold the cause.
  • capability A deletion in a gene's control region can raise its output in one cell type and spare the rest: Arhgap36 harms development in other animals when over- or under-active, yet orange cats overexpress it only in melanocytes.
  • constraint The causal case rests on who carries the deletion, RNA levels and the inheritance pattern, so the step by which the missing 5 kilobases raise Arhgap36 output is still described as presumed.

Barsh's group expected the cause to sit inside the gene. With Arhgap36 overactive in orange skin, the obvious suspect was a mutation in its protein-coding section. The change turned up instead as a deletion in the sequence immediately preceding the gene [8]. A trait whose gene had stayed hidden for more than 60 years [6] traced back to a part of the genome that codes for no protein [4]. "It's been a genetic mystery, a conundrum," Barsh told Science in 2024, when the findings first appeared as preprints [5].

The question I ask first is about the denominator. The database behind the result held 188 cats: 145 orange, 6 calico or tortoiseshell and 37 with no orange [2]. The deletion was in every orange cat examined [1]. Showing that it is missing from cats without orange is the job of those 37, about a fifth of the sample [17]. The ScienceAlert account does not report how many of them carried it.

I think the regulatory explanation holds on what is reported. A second team reached the same gene independently [14] and supplied the step between gene and color. Hidehiro Toh's group found that higher Arhgap36 expression suppresses pigment genes, shifting cells from dark brown-to-black eumelanin toward reddish-to-yellow pheomelanin [15]. Barsh's team is direct about its own conclusion. "Taken together, these observations provide strong genetic and genomic evidence that the 5 kb deletion causes sex-linked orange," they write in their paper [3].

The X chromosome accounts for the patchwork. Each female cell silences one of its two X chromosomes at random, so skin where the deletion-carrying X stays active grows orange beside skin where that X has been switched off [10]. Calico cats differ from tortoiseshells by carrying, in the words of Barsh and colleagues, "an additional white spotting mutation in calico that affects the ability of developing melanocytes to survive as they migrate away from the neural crest" [16].

ScienceAlert reports no obvious harm to health or mental wellbeing from the mutation, and no scientific support for the folk idea that orange cats are dimmer than others [13].

What to watch

  • Whether the published Stanford paper reports how often the 5-kilobase deletion appears among the 37 cats without orange fur.
  • An experiment that removes or restores the segment in cat pigment cells and measures Arhgap36 output directly.
  • Whether the Kyushu team's deletion has the same boundaries as the Stanford group's 5-kilobase gap.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence62
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+15
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence58
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    The 5 kilobase deletion was present in every orange cat the researchers examined.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Barsh team, via ScienceAlert2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  2. [2]

    The database examined held 188 cats: 145 orange, 6 calico/tortoiseshell and 37 nonorange.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Barsh team, via ScienceAlert2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  3. [3]

    "Taken together, these observations provide strong genetic and genomic evidence that the 5 kb deletion causes sex-linked orange," Barsh and team write in their paper.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Barsh and colleagues, via ScienceAlert2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. sciencealert.com

    1 article · October 9, 2026

    Secret of Orange Cats Finally Revealed After 60-Year Search

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Loading related stories