Skip to content

Leadership Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

H-1B wage weighting and a contested $100,000 fee favor the best-paid applicants

Applications to the March 2026 H-1B lottery fell more than 38% from a year earlier, USCIS said, while the $100,000 fee stays held up in the courts. Business Insider concludes that employers with cash and workers with scarce skills come out ahead.

The Board Room · Leadership desk

How we use AI Send a correction

Illustration accompanying H-1B wage weighting and a contested $100,000 fee favor the best-paid applicants
Generated illustration
Proposed fee is more than the overall median wage Median annual pay as of May 2025, set against Trump's proposed $100,000 H-1B fee for new applicants.

Key figures: the overall median annual wage was $50,980 as of May 2025. The proposed H-1B fee for new applicants is $100,000 and is held up in the courts. Data scientists earned a median annual salary of $120,230 as of May 2025.

Proposed fee is more than the overall median wage
FigureValueNoteClaim
Overall median annual wage50,980 dollarsAs of May 20256
Proposed H-1B fee, new applicants100,000 dollarsHeld up in the courts22
Data scientists, median annual salary120,230 dollarsAs of May 20254

What happened

  • On Thursday, Vice President JD Vance announced a crackdown on the green-card pathway for workers at some tech firms, including Microsoft and Adobe.
  • Wage-weighted cap selection replaced the randomized H-1B lottery earlier this year and gives applicants in higher wage bands a greater chance of selection.
  • Certified applications for data scientists rose nearly a quarter in 2026, the largest increase in any category with more than 5,000 applications.
  • USCIS spokesperson Zach Kahler said the goal is for employment-based visas to "supplement, not supplant American workers."

Why it matters

  • constraint Lower-paid occupations have the least room to absorb a fee of this size, so sponsoring them is hardest to justify wherever the fee applies.
  • contradiction A practitioner sees no rule that favors any company, while the analysis sees an advantage for employers with cash; the dispute is over whether cost or rule text is the test.
  • decision Sponsors filing in the next cycle must price a fee whose court status can change, and the wage band they file in alters their odds.

The size of the fee limits which hires are worth sponsoring. Business Insider reasons that an employer facing a potential $100,000 payment on top of a salary would likely pay it only for someone earning well above $100,000 [21]. Set against May 2025 medians, the fee equals about 83% of a data scientist's $120,230 [4][17] and about 71% of the $140,300 earned by computer and information research scientists [5][18]. It is nearly twice the $50,980 median annual wage across all occupations [6][19].

The filings fit that pattern, with limits. Business Insider ties some of the largest increases to generative AI trends [16], and its analysis covers the first three quarters of each of the last three fiscal years [15]. Certified applications are not visas issued, and they may include updates to information on existing employees [9].

The employer-side claim meets a denial from an immigration lawyer. Ted Chiappari, head of immigration law at Duane Morris, told Business Insider that nothing in the changes to H-1B rules or policies "would favor one company over another" [24]. Business Insider's own conclusion is that employers with cash are seeing a relative advantage [20]. In our view both can hold, because a rule can be neutral on its face and still cost less, in relative terms, for a firm that can absorb it. The occupation figures do not show which companies filed them, so the employer-side claim rests on that reasoning.

The candidate side is better evidenced. Catherine Macris, a partner at Fragomen, said recent changes have placed increased emphasis on "specialization, compensation levels, and employer compliance readiness" [11]. Specialized roles "align more readily with evolving H-1B eligibility and wage considerations," Macris said [12]. Wage weighting is a stated rule, and the high-paying occupations in the data show some of the largest increases.

The fee itself is held up in the courts [22]. Chiappari nonetheless said it is "probably the main reason" lottery applications fell [23], in a system where demand still outweighs the 85,000 visas issued each year [8]. How the green-card crackdown works is not described in the account, and the White House and the Department of Labor did not respond to requests for comment [14]. A sponsor filing in the next cycle is pricing a charge that may not apply, and the wage band it files in changes its odds.

What to watch

  • A court ruling on the $100,000 fee, which would show whether its deterrent effect needs the charge to be collected.
  • The full-fiscal-year H-1B hiring data expected later this year, the first check of filing gains against actual hires.
  • Whether next year's lottery applications recover from the more than 38% drop or stay low.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption40
Hype gap+20
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    A wage-weighted H-1B cap selection replaced the randomized lottery earlier this year and gives applicants in higher wage bands a greater chance of being selected.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  2. [2]

    Data scientists saw certified H-1B applications rise by nearly a quarter year-over-year in 2026, the largest increase of any job category with more than 5,000 applications.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    Applications for computer and information research scientists rose nearly 40%.

    Reported SupportedView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. businessinsider.com

    1 article · October 14, 2026

    The winners and losers of the new H-1B era

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Loading related stories