Skip to content

Science1 publisherNot yet confirmed elsewhere2 min readPublished

Fourteen US and UK educators describe pulling books before any parent or group complains

Researchers at UConn and the University of Glasgow interviewed 14 teachers and librarians who said they self-censor book choices to head off challenges. A book pulled before anyone objects never shows up in a challenge count, but 14 interviews cannot say how often that happens.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying Fourteen US and UK educators describe pulling books before any parent or group complains
Generated illustration

What happened

  • The 14 K-12 teachers, school librarians and public librarians in the US and UK were found through the researchers' networks, interviewed alone or in small groups, and joined two workshops.
  • Books on gender and sexuality drew the most frequent challenges, along with violence, death even for teen readers, and, mostly in the UK, migration and refugee status.
  • Anna Mae Duane said many complaints come from groups such as Moms for Liberty, which have large legal budgets, sometimes at schools where the group has no children enrolled.
  • The UConn and Glasgow team, working under the title Reading in a Permacrisis, built a toolkit meant to help educators before a challenge arises.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint Formal challenge counts record only complaints that get filed, so they understate the effect wherever teachers pull books first, and sizing that gap needs a different measure.
  • exposure Teachers in communities that back them stay exposed, because a complainant with a legal budget needs no child at the school to file.
  • decision Schools and training programs deciding how to support teachers now have interview evidence pointing at peer networks for isolated staff, the first goal the research team set itself.
  • precedent If 19-year-old trainees already expect complaints, the habit of leaving books out can be in place before a teacher runs a first classroom.

Fourteen people reached through the researchers' own contacts [3] is a small convenience sample. The team describes the work as a survey [2], though what it ran were interviews and workshops. Interviews suit the question of how censorship plays out inside a school and how it feels to the person deciding what goes on the shelf. They cannot produce a rate, and the study had no comparison group of educators who faced no pressure.

The useful finding concerns timing. Educators said they felt isolated, and that they trimmed reading lists and the books on offer in advance to sidestep problems, including in places where parents and the wider community have traditionally backed them [1]. A title handled that way never draws a complaint. Any count built from formal challenges misses it by construction. Wherever these interviewees' habits hold, the reach of book challenges into classrooms exceeds what such counts record. The thing this doesn't tell you is by how much. The write-up does not report how many titles any interviewee left out, so there is no ratio of unrecorded removals to filed challenges to set beside a ban tally.

Isolation was the reason interviewees gave [1], and the remedy they named was each other. Teachers described a cohort of peers fresh out of school, or one within a school system, that helps them work through procedures [12]. "We heard that over and over again, that those networks were vital," said Katharine Capshaw, a UConn English professor on the project [7] [9]. "So, our first goal from this is to support them." [7]

Anna Mae Duane, who directs the UConn Humanities Institute [9], found the pressure abroad as well. "I had thought the extremes of book banning were just a U.S. issue, but it is an issue in Scotland too," she said [5]. In Scotland, she said, the emphasis falls on different things, but there is a sense that an unhappy parent could mean a legal battle [13].

The habit may form before the first job. Victoria Ford Smith, a UConn associate professor, teaches children's literature to English students, many of them teachers in training [10]. "I've had students say things like, 'I would be afraid to have this in my classroom library,'" she said. "They're 19, and they're anticipating complaints from parents or outside organizations." [8] She uses those moments to push back, she said, with questions such as "What child are you imagining? Can we think of a child for whom this would be completely appropriate?" [11]

What to watch

  • A larger, randomly sampled survey asking teachers how many titles they have left out, giving the practice these 14 describe a rate.
  • A district-level comparison of classroom and library holdings against filed challenges, to measure how far removals outrun the formal count.
  • Any evaluation of the team's toolkit showing whether it changes what educators put on their shelves.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence35
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+20
Incentives40
Confidence45
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Educators report feeling isolated, so they are electing to self-censor reading lists and book availability to preemptively sidestep problems, even in places where they have traditionally enjoyed widespread parent and community support.

    ReportedSupportedSource: phys.org, reporting the project's findings2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  2. [2]

    "Reading in a Permacrisis: Building Critical Literacies with Children's Literature" is a collaboration between researchers at UConn and the University of Glasgow who surveyed teachers and librarians on censorship and book bans and developed a toolkit to help them before challenges arise.

    ReportedSupportedSource: phys.orgView cited source
  3. [3]

    The group used their networks to find 14 K-12 teachers, school librarians and public librarians in the U.S. and United Kingdom, and interviewed them individually and in small groups; the educators also participated in two collaborative workshops.

    ReportedSupportedSource: phys.orgView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. phys.org

    1 article · October 7, 2026

    Survey finds K-12 educators self-censor to avoid controversy over book selections

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

  • Children's literatureFollow
  • Book bans and censorshipFollow
  • School and public librariesFollow

Entities

Loading related stories