Science1 publisherNot yet confirmed elsewhere2 min readPublished
Fourteen US and UK educators describe pulling books before any parent or group complains
Researchers at UConn and the University of Glasgow interviewed 14 teachers and librarians who said they self-censor book choices to head off challenges. A book pulled before anyone objects never shows up in a challenge count, but 14 interviews cannot say how often that happens.
The Scientist · Science desk

What happened
- The 14 K-12 teachers, school librarians and public librarians in the US and UK were found through the researchers' networks, interviewed alone or in small groups, and joined two workshops.
- Books on gender and sexuality drew the most frequent challenges, along with violence, death even for teen readers, and, mostly in the UK, migration and refugee status.
- Anna Mae Duane said many complaints come from groups such as Moms for Liberty, which have large legal budgets, sometimes at schools where the group has no children enrolled.
- The UConn and Glasgow team, working under the title Reading in a Permacrisis, built a toolkit meant to help educators before a challenge arises.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint Formal challenge counts record only complaints that get filed, so they understate the effect wherever teachers pull books first, and sizing that gap needs a different measure.
- exposure Teachers in communities that back them stay exposed, because a complainant with a legal budget needs no child at the school to file.
- decision Schools and training programs deciding how to support teachers now have interview evidence pointing at peer networks for isolated staff, the first goal the research team set itself.
- precedent If 19-year-old trainees already expect complaints, the habit of leaving books out can be in place before a teacher runs a first classroom.
Fourteen people reached through the researchers' own contacts [3] is a small convenience sample. The team describes the work as a survey [2], though what it ran were interviews and workshops. Interviews suit the question of how censorship plays out inside a school and how it feels to the person deciding what goes on the shelf. They cannot produce a rate, and the study had no comparison group of educators who faced no pressure.
The useful finding concerns timing. Educators said they felt isolated, and that they trimmed reading lists and the books on offer in advance to sidestep problems, including in places where parents and the wider community have traditionally backed them [1]. A title handled that way never draws a complaint. Any count built from formal challenges misses it by construction. Wherever these interviewees' habits hold, the reach of book challenges into classrooms exceeds what such counts record. The thing this doesn't tell you is by how much. The write-up does not report how many titles any interviewee left out, so there is no ratio of unrecorded removals to filed challenges to set beside a ban tally.
Isolation was the reason interviewees gave [1], and the remedy they named was each other. Teachers described a cohort of peers fresh out of school, or one within a school system, that helps them work through procedures [12]. "We heard that over and over again, that those networks were vital," said Katharine Capshaw, a UConn English professor on the project [7] [9]. "So, our first goal from this is to support them." [7]
Anna Mae Duane, who directs the UConn Humanities Institute [9], found the pressure abroad as well. "I had thought the extremes of book banning were just a U.S. issue, but it is an issue in Scotland too," she said [5]. In Scotland, she said, the emphasis falls on different things, but there is a sense that an unhappy parent could mean a legal battle [13].
The habit may form before the first job. Victoria Ford Smith, a UConn associate professor, teaches children's literature to English students, many of them teachers in training [10]. "I've had students say things like, 'I would be afraid to have this in my classroom library,'" she said. "They're 19, and they're anticipating complaints from parents or outside organizations." [8] She uses those moments to push back, she said, with questions such as "What child are you imagining? Can we think of a child for whom this would be completely appropriate?" [11]
What to watch
- A larger, randomly sampled survey asking teachers how many titles they have left out, giving the practice these 14 describe a rate.
- A district-level comparison of classroom and library holdings against filed challenges, to measure how far removals outrun the formal count.
- Any evaluation of the team's toolkit showing whether it changes what educators put on their shelves.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence35
- Adoption
- Insufficient
- Hype gap+20
- Incentives40
- Confidence45
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
Educators report feeling isolated, so they are electing to self-censor reading lists and book availability to preemptively sidestep problems, even in places where they have traditionally enjoyed widespread parent and community support.
ReportedSupportedSource: phys.org, reporting the project's findings2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source - [2]
"Reading in a Permacrisis: Building Critical Literacies with Children's Literature" is a collaboration between researchers at UConn and the University of Glasgow who surveyed teachers and librarians on censorship and book bans and developed a toolkit to help them before challenges arise.
- [3]
The group used their networks to find 14 K-12 teachers, school librarians and public librarians in the U.S. and United Kingdom, and interviewed them individually and in small groups; the educators also participated in two collaborative workshops.
- [4]
Books dealing with gender and sexuality see the most frequent challenges, along with those that contain violence and, mostly in the U.K., migration and refugee status; books that raise the issue of death are also often objected to, even for teen readers.
- [5]
"I had thought the extremes of book banning were just a U.S. issue, but it is an issue in Scotland too."
ReportedSupportedSource: Anna Mae Duane, director of the UConn Humanities InstituteView cited source - [6]
"Another takeaway was how often some of these battles are not coming from parents at all. They come from organizations like Moms for Liberty, which have large legal budgets. Sometimes there are no children belonging to anyone at the school, and these organizations still will pursue a complaint."
- [7]
"We heard that over and over again, that those networks were vital. So, our first goal from this is to support them."
- [8]
"I've had students say things like, 'I would be afraid to have this in my classroom library.' They're 19, and they're anticipating complaints from parents or outside organizations."
- [9]
Katharine Capshaw is a UConn English professor; Anna Mae Duane is director of the UConn Humanities Institute and an English professor; Melanie Ramdarshan Bold is at the University of Glasgow.
- [10]
Victoria Ford Smith, a UConn associate professor, teaches the university's children's literature course, whose English students include many teachers in training.
- [11]
"What child are you imagining? Can we think of a child for whom this would be completely appropriate?"
- [12]
Teachers said their communities were what sustained them, whether a cohort of peers just out of school or a cohort within a school system that can help them work through procedures and approaches.
- [13]
In Scotland the emphasis is on different things, but there exists the sense that if a parent is unhappy, it could become a legal battle.
Sources
1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.
- phys.orgSurvey finds K-12 educators self-censor to avoid controversy over book selections
1 article · October 7, 2026
Topics and entities
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Entities
- University of ConnecticutFollow
- University of GlasgowFollow
- Moms for LibertyFollow
- Katharine CapshawFollow
- Anna Mae DuaneFollow
- Melanie Ramdarshan BoldFollow
- Victoria Ford SmithFollow