Skip to content

Science1 publisherNot yet confirmed elsewhere2 min readPublished

Elche sixth-graders who read LGBT-themed books for a year gave more accepting answers than a control group

University of Alicante researchers report that 31 Elche sixth-graders taught with LGBT-themed books for a year gave more accepting answers than 46 controls. With 77 pupils and only an end-of-year questionnaire described, the result is a first signal that a larger trial would need to confirm.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AISend a correction

What happened

  • The experimental group read picture books, tales, poems, comics and novel excerpts such as And Tango Makes Three, while the control group kept the standard reading curriculum.
  • No pupil in the experimental group rejected the idea of having a lesbian or gay friend, while 6.5% of the control group expressed reluctance.
  • Acceptance of bisexual and trans people exceeded 70% in both groups, with no statistically significant difference between them.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • decision A school adopting this would be committing a year of guided class discussion as well as a book list, because the trial tested reading and discussion together and cannot separate their effects.
  • constraint Differences resting on about three control pupils are enough to justify a pilot in another school, but too thin on their own to support a regional curriculum change.
  • constraint The authors' case that such readings help prevent bullying goes beyond their outcome measures, since the questionnaire asked about attitudes, self-concept and self-acceptance.

The percentages in this study stand for small numbers of children. The 6.5% of the control group who were reluctant to have a lesbian or gay friend is about three of its 46 pupils [17]. On the possibility of feeling attracted to someone of the same sex, the experimental group's positive answers come to about 14 of 31 pupils, against about 13 of 46 controls [18]. Rejection on the same item was about three experimental pupils and about 14 controls [19].

That attraction item shows the widest gap, 16.9 percentage points on positive answers [20]. Guillermo Soler, María Ribes and José Rovira-Collado, the University of Alicante team behind the paper in Education Sciences [2], are precise about what it captures. The authors said that "these findings do not imply that students identify as homosexual or bisexual, as the question assessed their willingness to accept that possibility within themselves, rather than determining their sexual orientation." [11]

The groups were compared once, at the end of the school year, on the same questionnaire [7]. The phys.org account does not say how pupils were assigned to the two groups, whether they were surveyed before the year began, or whether the attraction gap reached statistical significance [4]. Without a baseline, a group that started the year more accepting would produce the same end-of-year result with no help from the books.

The intervention was also more than a reading list. Alongside the texts, the sessions ran guided activities to analyse how non-normative characters were represented, and passages showing rejection or bullying were taken up through dialogue [6]. All of it ran inside Spanish language and literature classes [3].

The trans self-identification item behaved like the bisexual and trans acceptance items. On the prospect of identifying with a different gender, 38.7% of the experimental group answered negatively and 35.5% neutrally [12], or roughly 12 and 11 of 31 pupils [21]. "In this variable, we likewise found no statistically significant differences between the groups," the researchers said [13].

The authors want curricula reviewed so that content on sexual diversity and gender identity appears from the earliest stages of school [16]. "This is necessary not only to raise awareness of different realities, but also to prevent bullying and violence while fostering safe school environments," they said [15]. They also call the work an initial study across two schools whose results should be read with caution [14].

I think that caution is the right weight. The Elche pupils who did this reading answered more openly on two items after a year [1][8], and the design as described cannot yet attribute that difference to the teaching.

What to watch

  • Whether the full Education Sciences paper reports a significance test for the 45.2% versus 28.3% gap on same-sex attraction.
  • A replication that surveys pupils both before and after the reading year and spreads the groups across more than two schools.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence35
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+20
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence40
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    The experimental group showed greater acceptance of having a lesbian or gay friend, with no responses indicating rejection, while 6.5% of the control group expressed reluctance.

  2. [2]

    The study was conducted by Guillermo Soler, María Ribes and José Rovira-Collado of the Language and Literature Didactics area at the University of Alicante and published in the journal Education Sciences.

    ReportedSupportedSource: phys.orgView cited source
  3. [3]

    The interventions took place in Spanish language and literature classes with sixth-grade students across two schools in Elche, over the course of an academic year.

    ReportedSupportedSource: phys.orgView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. phys.org

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    Introducing LGBT stories linked to more inclusive attitudes in primary schools

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities