Skip to content

Science Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Jellyfish relatives 600 million years apart arrived at identical gene changes

Biologists at four US universities found identical genetic changes in jellyfish lineages separated by more than 600 million years. Most did not track the eyes and other traits that also evolved repeatedly, the authors report.

The Scientist · Science desk

Send a correction

Illustration accompanying Jellyfish relatives 600 million years apart arrived at identical gene changes
Generated illustration
Matched lineages split near the clade's emergence Age of the jellyfish clade Medusozoa beside the separation between lineages that share identical gene changes, in million years.

Bar comparison: Medusozoa, the clade of jellyfish and their relatives, emerged about 650 million years ago; lineages with identical genetic changes are more than 600 million years apart.

Duration in million years, Medusozoa history In million years

Matched lineages split near the clade's emergence (Duration in million years, Medusozoa history)
ItemValueClaim
Medusozoa clade age, about650 million years4
Matched lineages apart, over600 million years14

What happened

  • The group worked on Medusozoa, a clade that emerged about 650 million years ago and includes repeated origins of eyes and repeated losses of the free-swimming medusa stage.
  • The authors describe the number of repeated molecular changes they found as "unexpectedly high".
  • They say natural selection can drive the same change in distant species, but that molecular convergence reflects a more complex process shaped by how organisms interact with their environments.
  • The paper appears in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, from teams at UC Santa Barbara, Kansas, Texas A&M and Nebraska.

Why it matters

  • What's now possible capability If gene-level change repeats this often, evolutionary outcomes become a candidate for prediction, which Oakley names as the point of asking how repeatable evolution is.
  • What it limits constraint A search for the genes behind repeated eyes or lost medusa stages cannot assume that convergent sites will mark those traits, because in this dataset they largely did not.
  • What doesn't add up contradiction Oakley says evolution looks more predictable at the gene level while the gene-to-animal link stays mostly unknown, so repeatability and explanatory power have come apart.

The study starts from a hypothesis simple enough to fail. Cory Berger, a postdoctoral researcher in Todd Oakley's lab at UCSB, put it this way: "Maybe it's just the case that organisms that have phenotypic convergence who look similar to one another have convergent molecular changes." [10]

Testing it took two steps. The team first built an evolutionary tree from fossil and molecular data and used ancestral state reconstruction to infer where traits such as eyes arose more than once [5]. The tree fixes which lineages converged in appearance, so the gene comparison can ask whether the same lineages also converged in sequence. Oakley described the second step. The team sequenced all the genes expressed in the different jellyfish, at least in theory, and then looked at the patterns of change across those genes. When the same specific change had happened in distantly related species, they counted it as convergence [6].

The reported answer rules out the simple version of the hypothesis [8].

The time depth deserves a second look. The clade emerged about 650 million years ago [4], and the widest pairs in the comparison are more than 600 million years apart [1]. That puts the deepest comparisons within about 50 million years of the clade's origin [14].

The thing this doesn't tell you is how large "unexpectedly high" is [7]. Phys.org's account does not include a count of convergent changes or the chance expectation the authors set against it, so the size of the effect is not available here.

Oakley was careful about what follows. In his view, the degree of genetic similarity suggests that evolution may be more repeatable than expected at the genetic level, and perhaps therefore more predictable. He added that it also means a huge amount remains to be learned about how the genes function and how that plays out on the whole-organism scale [9].

We would carry the narrow finding forward. In this group, sharing a history of convergent traits did not predict sharing a gene change. The paper's title says convergence is "pervasive across deep time" [3], but the researchers sampled one clade, Medusozoa [13]. Whether the pattern holds in other animals is a separate experiment.

What to watch

  • Whether the full paper reports a count of convergent changes and the chance expectation it was tested against.
  • Functional tests of what the shared changes do in the animal, the gap Oakley says remains.
  • Whether the same analysis on other animal groups finds a similar excess of repeated changes.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence62
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap−10
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence60
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    By reconstructing and studying sections of jellyfish genomes from the deep past, researchers found evidence of identical genetic changes in multiple lineages separated by more than 600 million years.

    Reported Supported Source: Phys.org, reporting the PNAS studyView cited source
  2. [2]

    The work was conducted by researchers at the University of California, Santa Barbara, the University of Kansas, Texas A&M University and the University of Nebraska, and is published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

    Reported Supported Source: Phys.orgView cited source
  3. [3]

    The paper is titled 'Adaptive molecular convergence is pervasive across deep time and largely decoupled from phenotypic convergence' (Berger et al., PNAS 2026).

    Reported Supported Source: Phys.org publication detailsView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. phys.org

    1 article · October 16, 2026

    Adaptive molecular convergence more common than previously thought, distant jellyfish relatives reveal

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Entities

Loading related stories