Skip to content

Science Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Ancient DNA from 45 colonial Montreal burials comes back European, with no sign of Indigenous mixing

Researchers led by Université de Montréal found 45 people from Montreal's Notre-Dame Cemetery consistent with 100% European ancestry, mostly French. The result tests accounts of settler-Indigenous mixing in New France, for one burial ground only.

The Scientist · Science desk

Send a correction

DNA came from a subsample of the excavated remains Individuals whose ancient DNA was sequenced, out of the about 200 individuals excavated.

A bar showing 45 sequenced individuals as a part of the about 200 individuals excavated.

DNA came from a subsample of the excavated remains
SharePartWholePercentClaim
Individuals sequenced45 of about 200 excavated200 of about 200 excavated23% (computed)21

What happened

  • The study is in PNAS, and Diane Martin-Moya says it is the first time ancient DNA has been sequenced in Quebec.
  • The team sampled 60 skull bones and 33 teeth from the 45 people, favouring the cochlea because it is least exposed to the environment.
  • A preliminary 3D morphological analysis by Martin-Moya had pointed to the same conclusion.
  • Reconstructed DNA sequences were compared with global population databases to find markers linked to geographic regions.

Why it matters

  • What it limits constraint No further cemetery is planned, so every other burial ground of the period stays untested.
  • Who has to decide decision Because remains are exhumed and partly destroyed during analysis, the researchers say archaeologists must reexamine some of their practices.
  • What doesn't add up contradiction Archaeological data place Indigenous people in the colony's first cemetery, Pointe-a-Calliere, while the 45 people from the main one show European ancestry only.

Forty-five people is a sample, and the denominator is the first thing to check. The excavations unearthed the remains of about 200 individuals [7], so the sequenced group is roughly 22.5% of them [21]. Phys.org's account of the study does not say how those 45 were chosen. The report says the remains of wealthier people were better cared for and preserved, and Martin-Moya said poorer families lacked the means to move their dead when the cemetery was destroyed by urbanization [16].

Zero admixed individuals in 45 is informative within limits. Suppose, generously, that the 45 were a random draw. The standard rule of three then puts the upper end of a 95% interval for the true rate at about 3 in 45, or 6.7% [22]. Mixing that was common in this burial ground would very probably have shown up. A few percent need not have.

Martin-Moya framed the result narrowly. "At the subsampling level, at least, there is no evidence of settler-Indigenous admixture," she said [9]. On other burial grounds she was explicit: "That doesn't mean the same would be true in other cemeteries, such as the cemetery for the poor, which dates from the same period," she said, "but in Notre-Dame Cemetery, which was the main one at the time, that is not the case." [10]

The result ran against the team's hypothesis. Isabelle Ribot, the bioarchaeologist who supervised the work, said some historical accounts suggest considerable mixing between settlers and Indigenous peoples [20]. "We hoped to demonstrate this by analyzing colonial cemeteries," she said [14]. The Phys.org report says the findings support doubts that Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers have raised about the narrative of admixture and harmonious relations between the French and First Nations [15].

On the burials that do include Indigenous people, Martin-Moya said: "Even if we find (the remains of) Indigenous people in cemeteries, the question remains: What was their place in society?" [13]

We think the result holds for what it samples: 45 people from the main parish burial ground, which was in use from 1683 to 1796 [18]. Statements about New France as a whole need more burial grounds than this one.

What to watch

  • Whether anyone sequences remains from the cemetery for the poor, the one site Martin-Moya said could give a different answer.
  • The PNAS methods: how the 45 were picked from about 200 individuals, and how small an Indigenous ancestry share the comparison databases can detect.
  • Whether archaeologists respond to the researchers' call to change practices when remains are partly destroyed during analysis.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+10
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    A Université de Montréal-led research team analyzed the genetic origins of human remains found in Old Montreal and reported unexpected results.

    Reported Supported Source: Phys.org report on the Université de Montréal-led studyView cited source
  2. [2]

    Diane Martin-Moya analyzed the DNA of 45 individuals from Montreal's Notre-Dame Cemetery, a burial ground dating back to New France.

    Reported Supported Source: Phys.orgView cited source
  3. [3]

    The analyzed remains were consistent with 100% European ancestry, mostly French.

    Reported Supported Source: Phys.orgView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. phys.org

    1 article · October 16, 2026

    Genetic evidence raises questions about settler-Indigenous relations in New France

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Loading related stories