Skip to content

InvestNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher3 min readPublished

Clarity Act's Senate stall hands US crypto rulemaking to the SEC and CFTC

With the Clarity Act stalled in the Senate, the SEC and CFTC are writing US crypto rules, but only one of their three measures since September 17 is in force. Executives expect faster deals from that route while lawyers warn its rules stay open to political and legal reversal.

The Investor · Invest desk

How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Clarity Act's Senate stall hands US crypto rulemaking to the SEC and CFTC
Photo: coindesk.com
Spot trading still lacks comprehensive federal oversight How the SEC's exemption and custody proposal and the CFTC's request for feedback reach each group, and where federal oversight is missing.

Spot trading lacks comprehensive federal oversight beyond CFTC anti-fraud powers. Qualifying venues can trade tokenized US stocks under an SEC exemption. An SEC proposal would let state trust companies hold client crypto. On leveraged retail trading, the CFTC only sought feedback.

Spot trading still lacks comprehensive federal oversight
WhoHowKindClaim
Unleveraged spot tradingNo comprehensive federal oversight beyond the CFTC's anti-fraud and anti-manipulation powersconstraint5
Qualifying trading venuesSEC Innovation Exemption lets them trade tokenized US stocks through blockchain liquidity poolscapability2
State trust companiesSEC custody proposal would let them safeguard client cryptocapability4
Leveraged retail crypto tradingCFTC only sought feedback, starting a lengthy comment and rulemaking process rather than putting rules into effectconstraint3

What happened

  • The SEC's five-year Innovation Exemption, introduced September 17, lets qualifying venues trade tokenized US stocks through blockchain liquidity pools while permanent rules are written.
  • An SEC custody proposal on October 1 would let state trust companies hold client crypto and let advisers and funds hold it themselves under certain conditions.
  • On October 5 the CFTC sought feedback on leveraged retail crypto trading rules and a new crypto-market registration category, opening a lengthy rulemaking process.
  • Apart from the CFTC's power to police fraud and manipulation, no comprehensive federal regime yet covers ordinary spot trading without leverage. That is the gap Clarity was meant to close.

Why it matters

  • constraint Until Congress acts, unleveraged spot venues are policed by enforcement powers alone, so they cannot plan capital around a comprehensive federal rulebook.
  • exposure Deals and buyback programmes priced on staff FAQs that are not SEC rules carry a reversal risk that a statute would have reduced.
  • decision Newer platforms must choose between building on a temporary exemption now and waiting for permanent rules, and established exchanges can absorb the cost of guessing wrong more cheaply.

"The SEC and CFTC are already moving proactively to provide the regulatory certainty markets need, and that's unlocking a wave of M&A across digital assets, traditional financial services, and fintech alike," KBW's head of digital assets, Paul McCaffery, said [9]. Matt Hougan, Bitwise's chief investment officer, would take the agency route in the short term over a law that would have required years of further rulemaking after it passed [10]. He also expects buybacks to spread to more protocols, buy-and-burn designs especially [10]. Both commit cash on the strength of agency action. Three of the agencies' measures came in the 18 days from September 17 to October 5 [15].

Some of what those decisions stand on is staff guidance. "The fact that the SEC staff is even willing to say these things explicitly is a win," said Cathy Yoon, chief legal officer at Temporal, a Solana-focused research and development firm, who also noted that staff FAQs are not SEC rules [11].

There are three ways this can go. Lev Breydo, an assistant professor of law at William & Mary Law School, expects the SEC to spend 2027 completing offering and custody rules and building on its tokenized-stock exemption [8]. He calls the agencies' March joint interpretive release an important foundation that supersedes earlier guidance [8]. If he is right, agency rules harden into a durable base. The second outcome, raised by the lawyers CoinDesk interviewed, is a set of rules vulnerable to political and legal change, with businesses adapting each time [17]. The third is Congress coming back to the gaps legal experts say it still has to address [14].

We think the second outcome is the likelier near-term one, and that it favours size. CoinDesk's summary says established exchanges could keep their competitive advantage [13], though the interviews it published do not name them or explain how. The case rests on structure: the exemption is open to qualifying venues [2], and the custody proposal applies only under certain conditions [4]. Each revision to a temporary rule is a compliance bill paid again. A large venue spreads that bill over more volume than a new one can. Breydo said Clarity exposed divisions within the industry, including over ethics provisions and the yield fight with community banks [7]. "A coalition that looked unified against Gensler found out definitions create winners and losers," he said [6]. We are wrong if the first venues to trade under the exemption are newcomers, or if the CFTC's new registration category for crypto markets comes out cheap enough for small platforms to use [3].

Breydo's list of the SEC's likely 2027 work does not include spot markets [8]. Unleveraged spot trading was the central gap Clarity set out to close [5]. "The biggest gap is implementation," said Derek Lowrey, head of legal at Newton Labs [12].

What to watch

  • Whether the SEC finalises its October 1 custody proposal, and what conditions it sets for advisers and funds holding crypto themselves.
  • What the CFTC's new crypto-market registration category costs after comment, and whether small platforms can afford to register under it.
  • Whether Congress takes up unleveraged spot-market oversight on its own, apart from the rest of the stalled Clarity Act.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+20
Incentives60
Confidence50
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act's failure to advance in the Senate has shifted the next phase of US crypto regulation to the SEC and CFTC.

    ReportedSupportedSource: CoinDeskView cited source
  2. [2]

    The SEC's five-year 'Innovation Exemption', introduced September 17, lets qualifying venues trade tokenized US stocks through blockchain liquidity pools while the SEC works on permanent rules.

    ReportedSupportedSource: CoinDeskView cited source
  3. [3]

    On October 5 the CFTC sought feedback on rules for leveraged retail crypto trading and a new registration category for crypto markets, starting a lengthy public comment and rulemaking process rather than putting rules into effect.

    ReportedSupportedSource: CoinDeskView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. coindesk.com

    1 article · October 11, 2026

    Clarity's failure could speed crypto innovation while shielding incumbents

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Loading related stories