InvestNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher3 min readPublished
Clarity Act's Senate stall hands US crypto rulemaking to the SEC and CFTC
With the Clarity Act stalled in the Senate, the SEC and CFTC are writing US crypto rules, but only one of their three measures since September 17 is in force. Executives expect faster deals from that route while lawyers warn its rules stay open to political and legal reversal.
The Investor · Invest desk

Spot trading lacks comprehensive federal oversight beyond CFTC anti-fraud powers. Qualifying venues can trade tokenized US stocks under an SEC exemption. An SEC proposal would let state trust companies hold client crypto. On leveraged retail trading, the CFTC only sought feedback.
- constraint Unleveraged spot trading No comprehensive federal oversight beyond the CFTC's anti-fraud and anti-manipulation powers, claim 5
- capability Qualifying trading venues SEC Innovation Exemption lets them trade tokenized US stocks through blockchain liquidity pools, claim 2
- capability State trust companies SEC custody proposal would let them safeguard client crypto, claim 4
- constraint Leveraged retail crypto trading CFTC only sought feedback, starting a lengthy comment and rulemaking process rather than putting rules into effect, claim 3
| Who | How | Kind | Claim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unleveraged spot trading | No comprehensive federal oversight beyond the CFTC's anti-fraud and anti-manipulation powers | constraint | 5 |
| Qualifying trading venues | SEC Innovation Exemption lets them trade tokenized US stocks through blockchain liquidity pools | capability | 2 |
| State trust companies | SEC custody proposal would let them safeguard client crypto | capability | 4 |
| Leveraged retail crypto trading | CFTC only sought feedback, starting a lengthy comment and rulemaking process rather than putting rules into effect | constraint | 3 |
What happened
- The SEC's five-year Innovation Exemption, introduced September 17, lets qualifying venues trade tokenized US stocks through blockchain liquidity pools while permanent rules are written.
- An SEC custody proposal on October 1 would let state trust companies hold client crypto and let advisers and funds hold it themselves under certain conditions.
- On October 5 the CFTC sought feedback on leveraged retail crypto trading rules and a new crypto-market registration category, opening a lengthy rulemaking process.
- Apart from the CFTC's power to police fraud and manipulation, no comprehensive federal regime yet covers ordinary spot trading without leverage. That is the gap Clarity was meant to close.
Why it matters
- constraint Until Congress acts, unleveraged spot venues are policed by enforcement powers alone, so they cannot plan capital around a comprehensive federal rulebook.
- exposure Deals and buyback programmes priced on staff FAQs that are not SEC rules carry a reversal risk that a statute would have reduced.
- decision Newer platforms must choose between building on a temporary exemption now and waiting for permanent rules, and established exchanges can absorb the cost of guessing wrong more cheaply.
"The SEC and CFTC are already moving proactively to provide the regulatory certainty markets need, and that's unlocking a wave of M&A across digital assets, traditional financial services, and fintech alike," KBW's head of digital assets, Paul McCaffery, said [9]. Matt Hougan, Bitwise's chief investment officer, would take the agency route in the short term over a law that would have required years of further rulemaking after it passed [10]. He also expects buybacks to spread to more protocols, buy-and-burn designs especially [10]. Both commit cash on the strength of agency action. Three of the agencies' measures came in the 18 days from September 17 to October 5 [15].
Some of what those decisions stand on is staff guidance. "The fact that the SEC staff is even willing to say these things explicitly is a win," said Cathy Yoon, chief legal officer at Temporal, a Solana-focused research and development firm, who also noted that staff FAQs are not SEC rules [11].
There are three ways this can go. Lev Breydo, an assistant professor of law at William & Mary Law School, expects the SEC to spend 2027 completing offering and custody rules and building on its tokenized-stock exemption [8]. He calls the agencies' March joint interpretive release an important foundation that supersedes earlier guidance [8]. If he is right, agency rules harden into a durable base. The second outcome, raised by the lawyers CoinDesk interviewed, is a set of rules vulnerable to political and legal change, with businesses adapting each time [17]. The third is Congress coming back to the gaps legal experts say it still has to address [14].
We think the second outcome is the likelier near-term one, and that it favours size. CoinDesk's summary says established exchanges could keep their competitive advantage [13], though the interviews it published do not name them or explain how. The case rests on structure: the exemption is open to qualifying venues [2], and the custody proposal applies only under certain conditions [4]. Each revision to a temporary rule is a compliance bill paid again. A large venue spreads that bill over more volume than a new one can. Breydo said Clarity exposed divisions within the industry, including over ethics provisions and the yield fight with community banks [7]. "A coalition that looked unified against Gensler found out definitions create winners and losers," he said [6]. We are wrong if the first venues to trade under the exemption are newcomers, or if the CFTC's new registration category for crypto markets comes out cheap enough for small platforms to use [3].
Breydo's list of the SEC's likely 2027 work does not include spot markets [8]. Unleveraged spot trading was the central gap Clarity set out to close [5]. "The biggest gap is implementation," said Derek Lowrey, head of legal at Newton Labs [12].
What to watch
- Whether the SEC finalises its October 1 custody proposal, and what conditions it sets for advisers and funds holding crypto themselves.
- What the CFTC's new crypto-market registration category costs after comment, and whether small platforms can afford to register under it.
- Whether Congress takes up unleveraged spot-market oversight on its own, apart from the rest of the stalled Clarity Act.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence55
- Adoption
- Insufficient
- Hype gap+20
- Incentives60
- Confidence50
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act's failure to advance in the Senate has shifted the next phase of US crypto regulation to the SEC and CFTC.
- [2]
The SEC's five-year 'Innovation Exemption', introduced September 17, lets qualifying venues trade tokenized US stocks through blockchain liquidity pools while the SEC works on permanent rules.
- [3]
On October 5 the CFTC sought feedback on rules for leveraged retail crypto trading and a new registration category for crypto markets, starting a lengthy public comment and rulemaking process rather than putting rules into effect.
- [4]
The SEC's October 1 custody proposal would let state trust companies safeguard client crypto and allow advisers and funds to hold it themselves under certain conditions.
- [5]
Ordinary, unleveraged spot trading still lacks comprehensive federal oversight beyond the CFTC's anti-fraud and anti-manipulation powers; closing that gap was a central goal of Clarity.
- [6]
"A coalition that looked unified against Gensler found out definitions create winners and losers."
ReportedSupportedSource: Lev Breydo, assistant professor of law, William & Mary Law School, quoted by CoinDeskView cited source - [7]
Breydo said Clarity exposed divisions within the industry, from ethics provisions to the yield fight with community banks.
- [8]
Breydo expects the SEC in 2027 to focus on completing offering and custody rules and building on its tokenized-stock exemption, and sees the agencies' March joint interpretive release as an important foundation that supersedes earlier guidance and allows coordination within existing law.
- [9]
"The SEC and CFTC are already moving proactively to provide the regulatory certainty markets need, and that's unlocking a wave of M&A across digital assets, traditional financial services, and fintech alike."
ReportedSupportedSource: Paul McCaffery, head of digital assets, KBW, quoted by CoinDeskView cited source - [10]
Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan sees the agency approach as more favorable in the short term than legislation that would have required years of follow-up rulemaking, and expects more protocols to adopt token buybacks, particularly buy-and-burn models, following SEC clarification.
- [11]
"The fact that the SEC staff is even willing to say these things explicitly is a win," Cathy Yoon, chief legal officer at Temporal, said, while noting staff FAQs are not SEC rules.
- [12]
"The biggest gap is implementation."
ReportedSupportedSource: Derek Lowrey, head of legal, Newton Labs, quoted by CoinDeskView cited source - [13]
Executives see opportunities for DeFi, but established exchanges could retain their competitive advantage.
- [14]
Legal experts expect gradual progress, with gaps Congress must address.
- [15]
Three SEC and CFTC crypto measures were issued in the 18 days from September 17 to October 5.
- [16]
Of the three measures, only the SEC Innovation Exemption is in effect; the custody plan is a proposal and the CFTC action is a request for feedback.
- [17]
Interviewees diverge over whether agency action can become a durable foundation or leave businesses adapting to rules vulnerable to political and legal change.
ReportedContestedSource: CoinDesk, summarising executive and legal interviews2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
Sources
1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.
- coindesk.comClarity's failure could speed crypto innovation while shielding incumbents
1 article · October 11, 2026
Topics and entities
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.