Invest1 publisherNot yet confirmed elsewhere3 min readPublished
Won's rally puts more than 10 points between Korea's hedged and unhedged S&P 500 funds
Four Korea-listed U.S. index ETFs took in 2.019 trillion won in the month to Oct. 7, ETF CHECK data show. A stronger won left the hedged version of TIGER's S&P 500 fund 10.67 points ahead of its unhedged twin over three months, so choosing a share class is now a call on the won.
The Investor · Invest desk
What happened
- KODEX U.S. Nasdaq 100 took in a net 730.6 billion won in the month to Oct. 7, the second-largest inflow of any Korean ETF, according to ETF CHECK.
- Three hedged S&P 500 funds returned 3.63% to 4.01% over three months while five unhedged funds tracking the same index lost 7.00% to 7.06%.
- Industry figures put the average cost of currency hedging at about 1.8% a year over the past three years.
- Mirae Asset's Kim Sang-yul expects the won to weaken from the 1,340 range back toward the high 1,300s per dollar.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- cost A holder who hedges for ten years at the recent average gives up about 18 points before compounding, roughly 1.7 times the three-month gap that now makes the hedge look like the obvious pick.
- exposure Buyers of the unhedged S&P 500 funds that led the month's inflows carry the full won risk, so any further appreciation comes straight off their won returns.
- decision Investors who rotate into hedged funds on last quarter's numbers take the opposite side of Mirae Asset's ETF head on the next currency move.
An unhedged fund's return in won combines the move in U.S. share prices with the move in the dollar. A stronger won shrinks the value of those shares on conversion even when they rise [7]. The ordering held over the past month too: the hedged RISE, KODEX and TIGER S&P 500 funds gained 1.26% to 1.40%, while the unhedged TIGER and SOL funds gained 0.90% and 0.89% [8]. The 10.67-point quarterly gap between TIGER's two versions [6] equals almost six years of hedging at the industry's average cost [18].
About half the new money went to S&P 500 funds listed without the hedge [20]. ETF CHECK ranks TIGER U.S. S&P 500 third with 663.9 billion won and KODEX U.S. S&P 500 seventh with 361 billion won [3]. Seoul Economic Daily tags the hedged share classes with an (H), and neither of those names carries one [5]. Together they took 1.02 trillion won of the four funds' 2.019 trillion won [1][19]. The TIGER fund among them lost 7.04% over the quarter [5]. The KODEX and TIGER Nasdaq 100 funds took the other 994.1 billion won [21]. The report does not give the Nasdaq funds' returns, so it cannot show whether the choice of index moved results as much as the hedge did.
Kim Sang-yul, head of global ETF management at Mirae Asset Global Investments, calls the won's climb a normalization after its first-half slide [10]. "We judge that the pace of the decline to the 1,340-won range was somewhat excessive, and in the short term a rebound looks more likely," he said [11].
If the rebound Kim expects arrives [12], unhedged holders recover at most about 4.5%, because no rate in the 1,300s sits more than that above 1,340 [22]. Even that rebound would return less than half of the quarter's gap [23]. A won that keeps strengthening widens the hedged funds' lead. A flat rate leaves hedged holders paying for cover they did not need. The industry says that cost builds up when won interest rates sit below dollar rates [9].
I think the quarter argues against switching wholesale into hedged funds, or rather against switching on the strength of one quarter. The gap came from a single currency move that Mirae Asset's ETF head calls somewhat excessive, and the hedge's cost comes due every year. The industry advice Seoul Economic Daily reports is to adjust part of an allocation and keep the rest [14]. Kim's own list of currency drivers is the counter-case: the Korea-U.S. interest rate gap, the semiconductor export cycle, corporate demand for currency conversion and foreign buying of Korean stocks [13]. If those push the won stronger than the 1,340 range, the hedged funds keep winning and this view is wrong.
On the stocks themselves Kim is positive. "This rally has been driven by earnings growth rather than multiple expansion, so as long as earnings estimates hold up or are revised higher, there is still room for further gains," he said [15]. He still recommends "a staggered or regular-installment buying approach" [16].
What to watch
- ETF CHECK's next monthly inflow table, and whether any (H) share class joins the unhedged TIGER and KODEX S&P 500 funds in the top 10.
- The Korea-U.S. interest rate gap, one of Kim's four currency drivers and the reason hedging costs build up when won rates sit below dollar rates.
- U.S. long-term Treasury yields, at their highest in more than two decades and already weighing on the index that both share classes track.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence60
- Adoption60
- Hype gap0
- Incentives40
- Confidence55
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
Four Korea-listed ETFs tracking major U.S. stock indexes attracted a combined 2.019 trillion won (more than 2 trillion won) over the month through Oct. 7; four of the top 10 domestic ETFs by inflows tracked major U.S. indexes.
- [2]
KODEX U.S. Nasdaq 100 drew a net 730.6 billion won over the month through Oct. 7, the second-largest inflow among domestic ETFs, according to ETF CHECK data released on Oct. 9.
- [3]
TIGER U.S. S&P 500 ranked third by inflows at 663.9 billion won and KODEX U.S. S&P 500 came seventh at 361 billion won.
- [4]
TIGER U.S. Nasdaq 100 placed ninth by inflows at 263.5 billion won.
- [5]
Three-month returns: hedged RISE U.S. S&P 500(H) 4.01%, KODEX U.S. S&P 500(H) 3.98%, TIGER U.S. S&P 500(H) 3.63%; unhedged 1Q U.S. S&P 500 -7.00%, PLUS U.S. S&P 500 -7.01%, HANARO U.S. S&P 500 -7.03%, TIGER U.S. S&P 500 -7.04%, SOL U.S. S&P 500 -7.06%.
- [6]
The gap between TIGER's hedged and unhedged S&P 500 funds reached 10.67 percentage points over three months.
- [7]
For unhedged funds, won-based returns reflect moves in the dollar as well as share prices; even when U.S. stocks rise, a stronger won lowers the value of those assets when converted back into won.
- [8]
Over the past month, hedged RISE, KODEX and TIGER U.S. S&P 500 funds rose 1.26%, 1.40% and 1.29%, while unhedged TIGER and SOL U.S. S&P 500 gained 0.90% and 0.89%.
- [9]
Industry figures show currency hedging has cost an average of about 1.8% a year over the past three years; when won interest rates are lower than dollar rates, those costs accumulate and can weigh on long-term performance.
- [10]
Kim Sang-yul, head of global ETF management at Mirae Asset Global Investments, described the won's recent appreciation as a normalization that unwinds its sharp first-half slide.
- [11]
"We judge that the pace of the decline to the 1,340-won range was somewhat excessive, and in the short term a rebound looks more likely."
ReportedSupportedSource: Kim Sang-yul, Mirae Asset Global Investments, quoted by Seoul Economic DailyView cited source - [12]
Kim expects any rebound to take the currency to the high 1,300-won range.
- [13]
Kim cited changes in the Korea-U.S. interest rate gap driven by monetary policy, the semiconductor export cycle, corporate demand for currency conversion and foreign investment flows into the stock market as the variables that will set the exchange rate's direction.
- [14]
Because hedged funds forgo currency gains if the won weakens again, existing investors are advised to adjust part of their allocation rather than move their entire holdings.
- [15]
"This rally has been driven by earnings growth rather than multiple expansion, so as long as earnings estimates hold up or are revised higher, there is still room for further gains."
- [16]
"While the AI infrastructure investment cycle supports earnings estimates, the index's upward trend remains intact, but it is advisable to maintain a staggered or regular-installment buying approach."
- [17]
Long-term U.S. Treasury yields surged to their highest in more than two decades on inflation concerns tied to rising oil prices and wider U.S. fiscal spending, weighing on equities.
- [18]
TIGER's 10.67-point three-month hedged/unhedged gap equals about 5.9 years of hedging cost at the 1.8% annual average.
- [19]
The two S&P 500 funds in the inflow top 10, both named without the (H) hedged suffix, took about 1.02 trillion won (1,024.9 billion won).
- [20]
The unhedged-named S&P 500 funds took about 51% (roughly half) of the four U.S. index funds' combined inflow.
- [21]
The KODEX and TIGER Nasdaq 100 funds together took 994.1 billion won.
- [22]
Any rebound to a level within the 1,300-won range is at most about 4.5% above 1,340 won per dollar, capping the currency gain for unhedged holders.
- [23]
A rebound of at most 4.5% recovers less than half (about 42%) of the 10.67-point three-month gap.
- [24]
Ten years of hedging at the 1.8% average annual cost totals about 18 percentage points before compounding.
- [25]
Ten years of hedging cost is about 1.7 times TIGER's three-month 10.67-point gap.
Sources
1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.
- en.sedaily.comWon Strength Splits Returns on Korea's U.S. Equity ETFs
1 article · October 8, 2026
Topics and entities
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Topics
- Exchange-Traded FundsFollow
- Korean WonFollow
- Currency HedgingFollow
Entities
- Mirae Asset Global InvestmentsFollow
- Kim Sang-yulFollow
- ETF CHECKFollow
- S&P 500Follow
- Nasdaq 100 IndexFollow
- TIGERFollow
- KODEXFollow