Skip to content

InvestNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher3 min readPublished Updated

Small RIAs below Fidelity's $100 million minimum have until June 30 to find a new custodian

Fidelity is giving advisory firms with less than $100 million on its custody platform until June 30 to move their accounts elsewhere. For firms that use Fidelity as their only custodian, the move means months of repapering client accounts, American Banker reported.

The Investor · Invest desk

How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Small RIAs below Fidelity's $100 million minimum have until June 30 to find a new custodian
Photo: americanbanker.com
Sole-Fidelity RIAs face the hardest move by June 30 How Fidelity's $100 million custody minimum reaches each group, per American Banker reporting and consultant Brad Wales.

Fidelity: June 30 deadline for firms under $100 million. Split-custodian RIAs: may transfer in enough to stay. Sole-Fidelity RIAs: down to Schwab and one other. Single-custodian tech: may need big changes. Advisors: project on top of day job. Clients: vacations can stretch repapering.

Sole-Fidelity RIAs face the hardest move by June 30
WhoHowKindClaim
FidelitySet a June 30 deadline for firms with less than $100 million on its platform to move to another custodiandecision5
RIAs split across custodiansSome can transfer enough assets in to meet the $100 million minimum and stay at Fidelitycapability14
Sole-Fidelity RIAsRivals' own minimum-asset rules narrow most firms' top choices to Charles Schwab and one other custodianconstraint1
Firms on single-custodian techAccount-management systems built for one custodian may need significant changes before working with anothercost10
AdvisorsMust run a very large transition project while still carrying their day-to-day jobcost9
ClientsNeed the custodial change explained; clients away on vacation can stretch repapering out for monthsexposure11

What happened

  • Firms that hold only part of their assets at Fidelity can transfer enough in to reach $100 million and stay, according to consultant Brad Wales.
  • Wales said the eight or so months to June 30 is enough for due diligence, tech integration and repapering if the first two phases take only weeks.
  • E-signature tools have removed most of the paper, but clients still need the change explained, and those away on vacation can stretch repapering out for months.

Why it matters

  • decision Firms split between Fidelity and another custodian must now pick one to consolidate at, and custodian-neutral software makes leaving Fidelity about as cheap as topping up there.
  • constraint A sole-Fidelity firm below the line is choosing from about one in six of the custody market, so rivals' minimums settle most of its decision before diligence begins.
  • cost Advisors pay mostly in their own hours, running integration and client repapering for several months while still serving clients day to day.

Fidelity's rule removes firms below $100 million from its platform [4], and the threshold counts assets entrusted to Fidelity, not a firm's total book [5]. A firm that already splits accounts between Fidelity and a second custodian therefore has to decide where to consolidate. The cost of moving is about the same in either direction. Such firms often run third-party systems like Advyzon, Orion or Black Diamond that are built to work with many custodians [12]. "So if they're using, just to pick one, Advyzon and underneath that they already have Fidelity or Schwab, they're not having to change anything with Advyzon," said Brad Wales, founder of the consulting firm Transition to RIA [16][13]. "They're just having to change what the account is actually held." [13]

Split firms can top up, and Fidelity keeps the relationship plus the assets moved in to qualify [14]. Or they can consolidate at the other custodian, and Fidelity loses its slice with nothing coming in to replace it. A third group, firms with Fidelity as their only custodian, has no top-up option, and Wales called them the real difficulty [14]. I think consolidating away will happen more often than Fidelity would like. A firm on custodian-neutral software is choosing on preference, because the effort is roughly equal on both sides [12]. The counter-case is that a firm keeps assets at Fidelity because it prefers Fidelity's service, in which case topping up is the default. If most split firms move assets in by June 30, that view is wrong.

For the sole-custodian firms, the binding limit is how few custodians will take them. About a dozen firms offer custody to RIAs [7], but Wales said most departing firms will end up choosing between two, one of them Charles Schwab, because many rivals have their own minimums [1]. Two realistic choices out of about 12 is one in six of the market [17]. Wales said a list that short means most firms can make a final choice within a few weeks [2]. "Realistically, if they were to reach out to me, I would narrow the list down quite quickly for them," he said [3]. He was describing work his own consulting firm would do [16].

Most of the months go to integration and repapering [6]. Account-management systems built for one custodian may need significant changes before they work with another [10]. All of it runs alongside normal client service. "But the problem is you still have your proverbial day job, right?" Wales said. "So you have to still carry the torch of everything you need to be on a day-to-day basis, and now you have this very large project on your hands, as well." [9]

On Wales's ideal schedule, a firm spends weeks on each of the first two phases and still has most of the roughly eight months left to chase straggler clients [8]. American Banker reported that the experts it spoke to are urging advisors who must switch not to wait, because transitions between custodians tend to produce unexpected hiccups [15].

What to watch

  • How many firms Fidelity counts below the threshold, and how many of them top up rather than leave before June 30.
  • Whether Schwab or other custodians lower their own minimums to take departing Fidelity firms.
  • What Fidelity does with accounts that have not moved by the June 30 deadline.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+10
Incentives65
Confidence50
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Wales said many of Fidelity's rivals also have minimum-asset requirements that sub-$100 million advisors are unlikely to meet, and that for most firms the top two choices will be Charles Schwab and one other custodian.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Brad Wales, Transition to RIA, via American Banker2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  2. [2]

    Wales said that with their options narrowed, most firms should be able to size up potential new custodians and make a final choice within a few weeks.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Brad Wales, via American Banker2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  3. [3]

    "Realistically, if they were to reach out to me, I would narrow the list down quite quickly for them," Wales said.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Brad Wales, via American Banker2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. americanbanker.com

    1 article · October 9, 2026

    How RIAs can beat the clock when leaving Fidelity custody

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Loading related stories