Skip to content

Science1 publisher3 min readPublished

"Data Deficient" was never a clean bill of health: a Patagonian rodent is now Endangered

Eight years of surveys at 66 sites moved Wolffsohn's viscacha from Data Deficient to Endangered on Argentina's Red List. The listing carries no automatic legal protection.

The Scientist · Science desk

Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying "Data Deficient" was never a clean bill of health: a Patagonian rodent is now Endangered
Photo: phys.org

What happened

  • Detailed information compiled over eight years of research on Wolffsohn's viscacha and the threats it faces led to a change in the species' official conservation status from Data Deficient to Endangered on Argentina's Red List, and the data is being used to help reassess its status on the global IUCN Red List.
  • The project was co-led by conservationists Lucas Hormachea and Morgan Pendaries, and their team surveyed 66 sites across the remote mountains of Patagonia, often working in extreme conditions to reach colonies.
  • Surveying 66 sites over eight years is an average of roughly eight sites per year.
  • To reach remote colonies in southern Patagonia the team spent weeks camping in isolated mountain regions without electricity or internet access; on one expedition they had to break through ice blocking a river crossing before their vehicle could continue; Pendaries described driving for eight hours through rocky terrain, sleeping in tents for more than two weeks, and dealing with freezing temperatures and strong winds.
  • The article credits a team of early-career conservationists from Argentina, refers to the group as the CLP team, and names BirdLife International and the Wildlife Conservation Society in connection with the work.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

Wolffsohn's viscacha, a rodent that scientists knew almost nothing about, has been reclassified from Data Deficient to Endangered on Argentina's Red List after eight years of fieldwork, and the same dataset is being used to reassess its status on the global IUCN Red List [4]. The interesting part is not the animal. It is that the status change was produced entirely by going and looking, which means the previous listing was recording an absence of surveyors rather than an absence of risk.

The project was co-led by conservationists Lucas Hormachea and Morgan Pendaries, whose team surveyed 66 sites across remote mountains in Patagonia [5]. Over eight years that is an average of roughly eight sites a year [15], which is a fair measure of how expensive this kind of baseline is: the team camped for weeks in areas without electricity or internet, drove for eight hours at a stretch over rocky terrain, slept in tents for more than two weeks at a time in freezing temperatures and strong winds, and on one expedition broke through ice blocking a river crossing before the vehicle could continue [6]. The source describes the group as early-career conservationists from Argentina working under the Conservation Leadership Programme, with BirdLife International and the Wildlife Conservation Society named in connection with the work [7].

What they found runs the wrong way from the reassuring reading of a Data Deficient label. According to Pendaries, people often assume that a Data Deficient species is safe, and that is not true; the species occupies a much smaller area than previously thought, faces multiple threats, and has disappeared from places where it was recorded in the past [8][1]. The team found new colonies as well as evidence of local population declines, assembling what the source calls the first robust picture of the species' status [2].

The threat list is mundane and therefore credible. Camera traps near colonies recorded interactions with invasive European hares and feral dogs, and interviews with local communities identified predation by dogs as an ongoing threat [9]. The viscacha also avoids areas popular with mountain climbers, which has shifted part of its range, and the researchers are increasingly concerned about climate change in the Patagonian Andes [10]. Basic natural history moved too: eight years ago the team thought the animal was mostly active by day, and now knows it is far more nocturnal than realised [11].

For context on how obscure this is, Wolffsohn's viscacha is by far the rarest of the world's five viscacha species, endemic to an area of Patagonia straddling the border between southwestern Argentina and southern Chile, and confined to remote rocky outcrops in the mountains [12]. It resembles a rabbit through convergent evolution rather than kinship; its closest relative is the chinchilla [13].

The listing itself does not do much on its own. Because of how local laws work, the Endangered classification on Argentina's Red List does not grant the species automatic protection [14]. Following discussions with authorities, a legislative proposal is being developed to declare Wolffsohn's viscacha a Natural Heritage Monument in Santa Cruz province, a designation that does carry legal protection under Argentina's National Parks Law [3].

Watch whether the Santa Cruz proposal is actually introduced and passed, and whether the global IUCN reassessment lands in the same category as the national one. The broader thing to watch is how many other Data Deficient entries are sitting in the same position: unlisted as threatened because nobody has spent eight years and 66 site visits establishing that they are.

Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories