A soft tick that lives ten years is why swine fever planners want the map now
Texas A&M modeled where Ornithodoros turicata can survive. The answer covers most of Texas and points at southeastern Georgia, where nobody has recorded the tick yet.
The Scientist · Science desk

What happened
- A Texas A&M team modeled where the soft tick Ornithodoros turicata can survive and published the result in Ecology and Evolution.
- The tick feeds at night, can go years between blood meals and can live for a decade or more, according to study lead Meriam Saleh.
- African swine fever is absent from the US but circulates in the Caribbean, Europe, Africa and parts of Asia.
Why it matters
- constraint Restocking a tick-occupied site would be governed by the reservoir's lifespan, pushing fallow decisions from months toward years.
- decision Surveillance and laboratory budgets can be aimed at modeled suitability now, instead of being reconstructed under emergency conditions.
- exposure With export access tied to disease-free status, the first confirmed pig closes markets, not the hundredth.
- capability A pre-outbreak tick baseline would let responders judge whether a farm's virus source is the herd or the burrows around it.
This tick does not wait on vegetation the way the hard ticks on a dog's ear do. Ornithodoros turicata lives inside dens and burrows, feeds for often less than an hour, usually at night, then withdraws into a crevice [11] [12]. That habit is why the Texas A&M work is about persistence rather than spread. African swine fever moves between pigs mainly by direct contact, contaminated feed or meat, and contaminated environments [9]. In parts of Africa where the virus is endemic, though, it is maintained in wildlife by soft ticks of the same genus [10], and an animal that can live ten years or more and wait years between blood meals is a slow container [12].
The container sets the terms of any response. Countries where ASF has been introduced have gone through mass depopulation of herds, long-term trade restrictions and losses in the billions [16]. Saleh's argument is that a cull clears pigs, not premises: "Even if you depopulate infected pigs, infected ticks could reintroduce the virus when new animals are brought in" [21]. Take the ten-year figure at face value and the fallow period on a tick-occupied site is set by tick biology rather than by how soon a producer wants to restock [23].
The map is aimed at that problem. The model rates most of Texas as suitable habitat, excluding the eastern portion, and flags highly suitable ground in southeastern Georgia where the tick has not been documented [13] [14]. Average temperature in the warmest months and moisture in the wettest periods were among the heaviest-weighted variables [15]. Suitability is a statement about conditions, not occupancy, so the Georgia result is mainly an instruction to go and look, and the first collections there will be testing the model as much as the ground [19]. The authors say the findings are meant to prioritise laboratory testing and field collection [3].
The reason a low-probability event earns this work is that the loss would not scale with the number of sick pigs. The US pork sector contributes more than $50 billion a year to national GDP and supports more than 550,000 jobs in production, processing and export [1], which works out to roughly $91,000 of annual GDP standing behind each of those jobs [18]. Export access depends on disease-free status, and a detection would likely be followed at once by export bans and large-scale control measures [2].
Saleh is careful on both the odds and the model. "Even though introduction isn't probable, it's possible," she says, "and because the consequences are so severe, it warrants serious attention" [8]. On range, she notes that expansion is not only a response to temperature and moisture: wildlife host availability could decide whether tick populations grow or shrink [22]. Dee Ellis, the co-lead from AgriLife Research and the entomology department, is working the industry and stakeholder side of the same question [6], which includes whether Texas populations of the tick could sustain or transmit the virus at all [17]. Knowing which counties hold a candidate reservoir is the cheap part of that programme. Finding out during a quarantine is the expensive version.
What to watch
- Whether field collection in southeastern Georgia finds O. turicata where the model predicts it, or finds nothing.
- Laboratory results on whether Texas-derived tick populations can actually sustain or transmit ASF virus.
- Any movement of ASF closer to the US from its current range in the Caribbean.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence48
- Adoption
- Insufficient
- Hype gap+14
- Incentives62
- Confidence44
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
The US pork industry contributes more than $50 billion annually to national gross domestic product and supports more than 550,000 jobs across production, processing and export sectors.
- [2]
The US is one of the world's leading pork exporters and international trade depends heavily on disease-free status; if ASF were detected in the US, immediate export bans and large-scale control measures would likely follow.
- [3]
The findings help inform where laboratory testing and field collection efforts should be prioritized as part of the research initiative.
- [4]
Researchers at the Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M AgriLife Research and the Department of Biology mapped where the soft tick Ornithodoros turicata is most likely to survive and examined what that means for African swine fever preparedness; the work was published in Ecology and Evolution.
- [5]
The project was led by Dr. Meriam Saleh, a clinical assistant professor in the Texas A&M VMBS Department of Veterinary Pathobiology.
- [6]
The study is co-led by Dr. Dee Ellis, a veterinarian in AgriLife Research and the Department of Entomology, who focuses on the industry and stakeholder impacts of the virus.
- [7]
African swine fever is not currently in the United States but is present in the Caribbean, Europe, Africa and parts of Asia; it is highly contagious in pigs and often fatal.
- [8]
Saleh: "It's on our doorstep" and "Even though introduction isn't probable, it's possible - and because the consequences are so severe, it warrants serious attention."
- [9]
ASF spreads primarily through direct contact between infected pigs, contaminated feed or meat products, and infected environments.
- [10]
In parts of Africa where ASF is endemic, the virus is maintained in wildlife through soft ticks in the same genus as O. turicata.
- [11]
Unlike hard ticks, soft ticks live inside animal dens and burrows rather than on vegetation, feed quickly (often for less than an hour) and then retreat into crevices.
- [12]
Saleh on the ticks: they feed at night, can survive for years waiting for another blood meal, and can live for 10 years or more.
- [13]
The ecological range model identified most of Texas, except the eastern portion, as suitable habitat for O. turicata.
- [14]
The model suggested potential northward expansion and highlighted highly suitable areas in southeastern Georgia, where the tick has not yet been documented.
- [15]
Average temperatures during the warmest months and moisture levels during the wettest periods were among the most influential environmental factors shaping habitat suitability.
- [16]
In countries where ASF has been introduced, outbreaks have led to mass depopulation of herds, long-term trade restrictions and billions of dollars in losses.
- [17]
The project seeks to understand whether Texas-derived populations of the tick could help sustain or transmit the virus if it were introduced into the US, and how that risk could affect the food supply, trade and cross-border livestock movement.
- [18]
The stated pork sector figures imply roughly $91,000 of annual GDP contribution per supported job.
- [19]
Because southeastern Georgia is rated highly suitable but has no documented record of the tick, early field collection there tests the model's prediction rather than confirming a known infestation.
- [20]
If ASF were introduced into pig populations and also infected local tick populations, those long-lived ticks could allow the virus to persist even after infected animals are removed.
- [21]
Saleh: "Even if you depopulate infected pigs, infected ticks could reintroduce the virus when new animals are brought in."
- [22]
Long-term changes in temperature and moisture patterns could alter where the tick can survive, and Saleh notes that changes in wildlife host availability could also influence whether tick populations expand or contract.
- [23]
Because the tick can live 10 years or more and survive years between blood meals, removing pigs from an infected, tick-occupied site places no near-term upper bound on how long the virus could persist there; the relevant fallow interval is set by tick lifespan rather than by restocking schedules.
Sources
1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.
- phys.orgResearchers map tick habitat to strengthen African swine fever preparedness
1 article · August 26, 2026
Topics and entities
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Topics
Entities
- Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical SciencesFollow
- Ecology and EvolutionFollow
- African swine feverFollow
- Dee EllisFollow
- Ornithodoros turicataFollow
- Meriam SalehFollow
- Texas A&M AgriLife ResearchFollow