Skip to content

LeadershipNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher3 min readPublished

Council parking apps add service fees worth up to 40% of the posted tariff

Councils moving to app-only parking leave drivers paying 10p to 30p in service fees, up to 40% above the advertised tariff, the Guardian found. Fees are set contract by contract, so an organisation that outsources payments sets its customers' real price there.

The Board Room · Leadership desk

How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Council parking apps add service fees worth up to 40% of the posted tariff
Photo: yahoo.com
App fees' share of the tariff varies widely by car park Service fee as a share of posted tariff. Harrogate is the Guardian's figure; the rest are desk calculations from fees and tariffs it reported.

Fee as share of tariff. Harrogate town centre: 30p on an 80p tariff, a 38% rise. Lancaster (RingGo): 20p on £2, 10%. Littlehampton (MiPermit): 10p on £1.90, about 5.3%. Birmingham (PayByPhone): 15p on £5.10, about 2.9%.

App fees' share of the tariff varies widely by car park
FigureValueNoteClaim
Harrogate town centre38 % on tariffMandatory 30p charge on an 80p tariff7
Lancaster, Kings Yard (RingGo)10 % on tariffDesk calc: 20p fee on a £2 tariff20
Littlehampton (MiPermit)5.3 % on tariffDesk calc, approx: 10p on £1.90 charge23
Birmingham (PayByPhone)2.9 % on tariffDesk calc, approx: 15p on £5.10 tariff21

What happened

  • Apps save councils the cost of installing and maintaining ticket machines, and while a few pay providers directly, many leave drivers to pay some or all of the bill.
  • None of the apps the Guardian tested clearly displayed the fee until the payment stage, and some required a click on an information symbol to explain the higher price.
  • In Harrogate, North Yorkshire, app payers in the town centre face a mandatory 30p charge, a 38% rise on an 80p tariff.
  • Drivers who opt for booking confirmation and expiry alerts pay extra again, typically 10p to 30p per text.

Why it matters

  • cost A flat charge in pence takes the largest share of the cheapest tickets, so drivers on short, low-tariff stays pay the highest percentage extra and the council's sign understates their bill by the most.
  • constraint Where machines have gone, a driver cannot avoid the fee, and because each council agrees terms with its own provider, no driver can predict the charge from one car park to the next.
  • contradiction Providers say the all-in price is shown before payment confirms; the Guardian found the breakdown behind small links and icons. Both hold, so the dispute is over where a quoted price begins.
  • decision For any organisation outsourcing customer payments, fee level and sign display are settled in the provider agreement, so the choice is made when the contract is signed or renewed.

The 40% figure is the top of the range, and it comes from cheap tariffs. In Chester the two-hour tariff at Christleton Road is 50p and the convenience fee is 20p [8]. The Guardian tested four apps by booking an hour's parking at car parks around the country [19], and on those bookings the fee added about 3% to 10% to the price [24].

A fee set in pence does not scale with the ticket. RingGo's 20p is 10% of a £2 tariff [20]. PayByPhone's 15p is about 3% of £5.10 [21], JustPark's 12p is about 3% of £3.50 [22], and MiPermit's 10p is about 5% of £1.90 [23].

Each app places the fee a little differently. RingGo shows a small "see prices" link above its "Next" button once a location is chosen [10]. PayByPhone explains its charge only on the payment page, behind the Apple Pay button, and customers must scroll to the end of the page to see it [11]. JustPark's fee sits behind a tiny pale grey "i" beside the final price [12]. MiPermit lists its fee above the final price at the end of the booking [13].

The providers dispute the framing. "Nothing is added at the payment stage," said a JustPark spokesperson [16]. "The pricing elements related to parking, SMS options and service fees are presented before payment confirmation," said a PayByPhone spokesperson [17]. "In line with existing regulations, wherever pricing information is shown in the RingGo app, we also display any additional fees," said Adam Dolphin at Arrive, RingGo's parent company [15]. All three can be true of the app screen. The car park sign is a separate question: many signs fail to mention that app payments may carry a fee [3], and RingGo said it is up to its council clients whether to show the fee on signs [14].

The legal footing is unsettled in the reporting. The Advertising Standards Authority says a contract is valid only if the quoted price includes every mandatory fee, and a driver contracts with the council on accepting the car park's terms and parking [25]. The Guardian notes that a driver who pays online also enters a separate contract with the app provider, so app fees may not legally have to appear on council signs [26]. We do not know yet whether that reading would survive a challenge. The Guardian said it contacted MiPermit for comment [18].

In our view the decision sits in the contract. Service fees are agreed between each local authority and each app provider, and they vary by location [27]. The Guardian did not report how many councils pass the full fee on to drivers, only that many pass on some or all of it [4]. An organisation that signs or renews a payment-provider agreement this quarter settles who pays the fee and who decides where it appears. The cost of that choice arrives later, as the gap between the tariff on the organisation's own sign and the amount its customer is charged.

What to watch

  • Whether the Advertising Standards Authority's rule on mandatory fees is applied to app fees charged under a separate provider contract.
  • Whether councils start printing the app fee on car park signs, since RingGo says that choice is theirs.
  • Whether MiPermit responds to the Guardian, and whether any council discloses how much of the fee it passes on to drivers.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence58
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+30
Incentives55
Confidence60
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Drivers are paying up to 40% more to park as more councils switch to app-only payments and customers pick up the tab.

    ReportedSupportedSource: The GuardianView cited source
  2. [2]

    Many councils across England have removed pay and display machines and replaced them with app payments, including a number in London.

    ReportedSupportedSource: The GuardianView cited source
  3. [3]

    Many car park signs fail to mention that app payments may incur an additional service fee.

    ReportedSupportedSource: The GuardianView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. theguardian.com

    1 article · October 11, 2026

    Drivers forced to use parking apps can pay up to 40% more

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories