LeadershipNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished
Sanderson's board fights a 12% shareholder's push to remove chair Dame Dianne Thompson
LBV Asset Management, which holds 12% of Sanderson Design Group, is pushing to remove chair Dame Dianne Thompson before an emergency meeting on 29 October. The board is fighting the motions, and the vote will show whether holders put half-year results ahead of complaints about pay and spending.
The Board Room · Leadership desk

Four figures: pay deals for the chair and chief executive equal 36 per cent of profit, say LBV-backing holders; half-year pre-tax profit was £2.5m, up two thirds; the board has met LBV 20 times since September 2024; shares rose 2.6 per cent to 79p in early trading.
| Figure | Value | Note | Claim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chair and CEO pay, share of profit | 36% | Per shareholders backing LBV | 15 |
| Half-year pre-tax profit | 2.5 £m | Six months to end of July, up two thirds | 5 |
| Board meetings with LBV | 20 meetings | Since September 2024 | 8 |
| Share price, early trading | 79 p | Up 2.6 per cent | 11 |
What happened
- Dame Dianne Thompson wrote to shareholders on Monday, urging them to reject LBV's "disruptive" attempts to oust her.
- Thompson is 75, and her board says it had already decided to start searching for her successor in January 2027.
- The board also told shareholders it has met LBV's representatives 20 times since September 2024.
Why it matters
- constraint The board has dated the start of the search, not the chair's exit, so rejecting LBV leaves her departure date open.
- exposure With half-year pre-tax profit near 4.9% of revenue, a pay figure quoted as a share of profit is sensitive to small changes in earnings.
- decision Holders on 29 October must decide whether a two-thirds profit rise answers complaints about pay and the headquarters, or whether it is a separate question.
The board's defence rests on six months of results. Revenue rose six per cent to £51m and pre-tax profit rose by two thirds to £2.5m in the six months to the end of July [5]. A two-thirds rise to £2.5m implies about £1.5m a year earlier [12], a gain of roughly £1.0m [13]. Pre-tax profit was about 4.9 per cent of revenue [14]. A recovery from a base that small supports the board's claim of momentum, and it leaves little profit for any pay deal to be measured against.
The pay complaint is the one with a number attached. According to shareholders who back LBV, the decision to give Thompson and the chief executive pay deals worth 36 per cent of group profit was "unjustified" [15]. City AM does not say which year or which profit measure the 36 per cent uses, so it cannot be set against the £2.5m half-year figure. The same shareholders criticise the "lavish" redesign of the new headquarters and the slow expansion in the US [15].
LBV's case on the chair is about timing. It says new leadership is needed to begin a "sustained period of change" [10]. The board points to the succession process it already had. Thompson wrote to shareholders: "Good governance requires proper succession planning, not the immediate removal of a Chair and the abandonment of an established process at a point when the Company's strategy is beginning to deliver." [7] The board had already decided to begin the search for her successor in January 2027 [6]. January 2027 is when the search opens, so in our view her exit would come after that date.
The board also questions LBV's motive. Thompson said: "When considering the strength of the Group's performance, together with LBV's stated support for the executive management team and operational strategy, I believe it right to question whether LBV's underlying intention is aligned to that of the wider shareholder base." [9] On her account, LBV backs the executives and the strategy. The pay complaint covers both the chair and the chief executive [15], yet the push City AM describes is aimed at the chair [2].
Shares rose 2.6 per cent to 79p in early trading [11].
The vote on 29 October [3] sets up next quarter whichever way it goes. If holders reject the motions, the January 2027 search is the only timetable left [6]. If they back LBV, the board needs a chair without the process it had planned.
What to watch
- LBV's own statement on whether it backs the chief executive and strategy, which would test the board's account of its motive.
- Whether the board or LBV publishes the profit period behind the 36% pay figure before the 29 October meeting.
- Whether other large holders say publicly how they will vote on LBV's motions.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence45
- Adoption
- Insufficient
- Hype gap
- Insufficient
- Incentives70
- Confidence50
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
LBV Asset Management owns 12 per cent of Sanderson Design Group.
- [2]
LBV has been pushing for the removal of chair Dame Dianne Thompson over the designer's drift towards 'inaction and inertia'.
- [3]
Sanderson has called an emergency meeting for 29 October and urged shareholders to vote against LBV's motions.
- [4]
Dame Dianne Thompson wrote to shareholders on Monday urging them to reject LBV's 'disruptive' attempts to oust her.
- [5]
Revenue rose six per cent to £51m and pre-tax profit grew by two thirds to £2.5m in the six months to the end of July.
- [6]
Thompson is 75, and the board had already decided it would begin searching for her successor in January 2027.
- [7]
Thompson wrote: 'Good governance requires proper succession planning, not the immediate removal of a Chair and the abandonment of an established process at a point when the Company's strategy is beginning to deliver.'
- [8]
Sanderson's board gave shareholders proof that it has met LBV's representatives 20 times since September 2024.
- [9]
Thompson told shareholders: 'When considering the strength of the Group's performance, together with LBV's stated support for the executive management team and operational strategy, I believe it right to question whether LBV's underlying intention is aligned to that of the wider shareholder base.'
- [10]
The investor claims new leadership is needed to kick off a 'sustained period of change'.
- [11]
Shares in Sanderson Design Group gained 2.6 per cent to 79p in early trading.
- [12]
Pre-tax profit a year earlier was about £1.5m, implied by a two-thirds rise to £2.5m.
- [13]
The half-year gain in pre-tax profit was roughly £1.0m.
- [14]
Half-year pre-tax profit was about 4.9 per cent of revenue.
- [15]
Shareholders supportive of LBV's attempt criticised the 'lavish' redesign of Sanderson's new headquarters, its slow expansion in the US, and the 'unjustified' decision to hand Thompson and the chief executive 36 per cent of the group's profit in pay deals.
ReportedContestedSource: City AM, describing shareholders supportive of LBV2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
Sources
1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.
- cityam.comKing’s favourite interior designer hits back at investor pressure
1 article · October 12, 2026
Topics and entities
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.