Skip to content

Science Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Nottingham Trent team says four blended lanthanide liquids make UV codes for anti-counterfeiting tags

Nottingham Trent researchers made four room-temperature lanthanide liquids that mix into distinct UV light signatures. Each new code then comes from a new mix of the same four liquids, though the tests so far were on paper.

The Scientist · Science desk

Send a correction

Illustration accompanying Nottingham Trent team says four blended lanthanide liquids make UV codes for anti-counterfeiting tags
Generated illustration
Four liquids give 15 combinations; pairs lead Desk count, not a figure from the paper: combinations of the four liquids, counting only which liquids are present.

Bar comparison of the desk's count of combinations of four liquids, counting only which liquids are present: 4 single liquids, 6 pairs, 4 triples and 1 four-way blend, 15 combinations in all.

Four liquids give 15 combinations; pairs lead (Desk count, by which of the four liquids are present)
ItemValueClaim
Single liquids4 combinations15
Pairs6 combinations15
Triples4 combinations15
Four-way blend1 combinations15

What happened

  • Each lanthanide gives its own characteristic pattern of wavelengths under ultraviolet light, so each liquid has its own optical fingerprint.
  • Blends of two lanthanides, and more complex ones of three or four, produced increasingly complex light signatures.
  • On paper, different lanthanide liquids and mixtures gave different optical responses under ultraviolet light at different wavelengths.
  • The University of Liverpool and the University of Manchester also took part in the study, which appears in RSC Advances.

Why it matters

  • What's now possible capability Senior author Anthony Fitzpatrick says manufacturers could tailor optical tags or identification systems to an application without synthesizing a new material each time.
  • What it limits constraint The authors say further research is needed before real-world performance is established, so the result is a demonstration of potential.
  • Who has to decide decision A security printer weighing the liquids would have to check the researchers' printing-compatibility claim on its own processes before relying on it.

A mark made with one of the liquids could look ordinary under normal conditions and show its pattern only under ultraviolet light [14]. Blending turns that into a code. The blends kept the characteristic emissions of their components [8], so in principle a pattern can be read back as a list of ingredients.

Phys.org's account says a small number of base materials can give a much larger range of signatures without further chemical synthesis [9]. We can put a floor under that range. Counting only which of the four liquids are present, there are 15 combinations: four single liquids, six pairs, four triples and one four-way blend [15]. The account also says the liquids could be combined in different proportions [5], and proportions would add codes beyond that count.

Dr. Anthony Fitzpatrick, the senior author, said: "Creating a more complex security signature does not require creating more complicated materials. Instead, different luminescent liquids can be combined to produce new signatures." [12]

The liquid state is the other selling point. Ph.D. student Annie Prasad said: "A key feature is that the new materials remain liquid at room temperature, making them easier to mix and formulate than materials that need to be processed as solid compounds." [16]

We think the mixing scheme is a sound design for a tagging problem, because the code space grows with the number of base liquids while the synthesis effort stays fixed. That is a claim about design, though, and the evidence so far is a bench demonstration.

The reported work does not show whether anyone who can read a signature can also reproduce it, how many signatures a reader outside a lab could separate, or how long a printed mark keeps its glow. A security feature is judged on those three. The 15-combination count is our own calculation from the number of liquids, and the paper's own count of usable codes may be higher or lower.

What to watch

  • Follow-up tests of printed marks on real packaging, since the reported demonstration was on paper.
  • Any report of how many mixing ratios a reader can reliably tell apart outside the lab.
  • Whether anyone tests if the signatures can be copied by someone with access to similar lanthanide liquids.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence50
Adoption
Not scored
Hype gap+15
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence60
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Researchers at Nottingham Trent University developed room-temperature liquids containing chemical elements that produce distinctive patterns of light, which they say could offer a flexible approach to optical tagging and anti-counterfeiting.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  2. [2]

    The materials are ionic liquids, salts that remain liquid at relatively low temperatures, combined with lanthanide elements.

    Reported SupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    Lanthanides are a group of 15 metallic elements, several with distinctive light-emitting properties; under ultraviolet light each produces its own characteristic pattern of wavelengths, giving the material a unique optical fingerprint.

    Reported SupportedView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. phys.org

    1 article · October 16, 2026

    Glowing liquids could help protect products from counterfeiters using distinctive ultraviolet light signatures

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories