Skip to content

Leadership Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Three in four surveyed employers do not say they are very confident they can run leave lawfully

NFP's survey of 1,004 US employers finds only 26% are very confident they can administer leave lawfully as the list of leave types grows. Among in-house teams without software, 46% spend three to five hours per request, up from 37%.

The Board Room · Leadership desk

Send a correction

Illustration accompanying Three in four surveyed employers do not say they are very confident they can run leave lawfully
Generated illustration
More in-house teams spend hours per leave request Shares of employers in NFP's survey. The hours measure covers employers managing leave in-house without dedicated software.

Key figures: 46% of employers managing leave in-house without dedicated software spend three to five hours on each leave request, up from 37% the year before. 69% of employers handle leave administration in-house.

More in-house teams spend hours per leave request
FigureValueNoteClaim
In-house, no software: 3-5 hours per request46% of employers5
Same group, year before37% of employers6
Handle leave in-house69% of employers18

What happened

  • About three in 10 employers outsource leave administration entirely, while 69% handle it in-house, often without dedicated resources.
  • Illinois Governor JB Pritzker signed the Menopause Equity and Care Act on August 7, 2026, and its employment provisions take effect January 1, 2027, according to the National Law Review.
  • More than half of employers, 54%, said they were unaware of emerging menopause legislation.
  • 34% of employers said they are open to offering menopause accommodations within five years, up from 25% last year.
  • Of employers that offer bereavement leave, 35% now extend it to miscarriage or failed IVF, up from 28% when NFP first measured it in 2023.

Why it matters

  • What it costs cost Software and outsourcing cost cash, and 66% of employers that have weighed outside help named cost as the main barrier, so for many the price of staying in-house is staff time.
  • Who's exposed exposure FMLA remedies stack liquidated damages and attorney's fees on lost wages, and HRD puts the cost of one mishandled leave at several times the wages involved.
  • Who has to decide decision Employers with Illinois staff have until the new year to check whether their accommodation process handles menopause-related conditions and who owns it.
  • What it sets up precedent More state bills are likely, with uneven passage: Bloomberg Law reported a surge in 2026 sessions, while Virginia's governor declined to sign a similar bill pending a labor department study.

NFP ran the survey in coordination with research firm Empatix [2], and Human Resources Director (HRD) noted that it measured confidence and not audited compliance, so the 26% shows how employers feel about their programs [4]. The sample skews small, with 72% of respondents having fewer than 500 employees [3]. The remaining 74% did not say they were very confident [24].

In our view the hours data is firmer evidence, though it is also a survey answer. The share of in-house employers without dedicated software who spend three to five hours per request is nine points higher than a year earlier [25]. Software does not close the gap on its own: even among employers with leave software, nearly half report spending at least three hours on each request [7]. The work being coordinated spans the Family and Medical Leave Act, paid family and medical leave programs run by the states, short-term disability and an expanding list of local requirements [8].

Employers have a reason to keep adding. "Leave is not just an administrative obligation," said Maria Trapenasso of NFP in New York, the firm's senior vice president and national practice leader for talent solutions. "It's a critical part of the employee experience and an important tool for attracting, supporting and retaining key talent." [9] We think the retention case explains part of the expansion, and the cost of each added type falls on whoever processes the requests.

NFP's 2026 report put current offerings of menopause accommodations at 10%, against 7% in this year's survey [28][26]. The materials HRD reviewed did not explain the difference [28]. In June 2025 Rhode Island became the first state to mandate menopause protections in the workplace, and Philadelphia's ordinance came that December [11].

HRD reports that most of these laws operate through the accommodation processes employers already have in place [23]. In the view of the law firm Proskauer Rose, Rhode Island's law extends protections on par with those pregnant employees have long had [16]. For an employer whose process works, the laws add little. HRD's caution is for the rest: for employers that have not looked at how they handle accommodation requests, the exposure may be a duty they already had, now applied more explicitly [29].

The second Illinois date is the one that reaches the benefits budget. The Menopause Equity and Care Act requires group health coverage to include menopause-related care from January 1, 2028 [13]. HRD separately reports that rising medical costs are squeezing HR budgets heading into 2027 [22].

What to watch

  • Whether Virginia's labor department study, requested by the governor who declined to sign the March bill, leads to a renewed menopause measure.
  • Whether NFP's next report shows menopause accommodation offerings above this year's 7% once Illinois's employment provisions are in force.
  • Whether the 46% share of in-house teams without software spending three to five hours per request rises again in the next survey.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence50
Adoption20
Hype gap+10
Incentives60
Confidence65
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Only 26% of employers say they are very confident they can administer leave accurately and in line with the law, according to NFP, an Aon company and benefits consultancy, in announcing its 2027 NFP US Leave Management Report.

    Reported Supported Source: NFP, 2027 NFP US Leave Management Report, as reported by Human Resources DirectorView cited source
  2. [2]

    The report drew on a survey of 1,004 US employers conducted in coordination with research firm Empatix.

    Reported Supported Source: NFP via Human Resources DirectorView cited source
  3. [3]

    72% of respondents had fewer than 500 employees, so the sample skews small.

    Reported Supported Source: Human Resources DirectorView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. hcamag.com

    1 article · October 16, 2026

    Employers keep adding leave. Few are confident they can run it

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories