Product2 distinct publishers3 min readUpdated
CBRE's 2026 report splits raw headcount from weighted quality, and the space between the two numbers is where hiring managers can actually act.
The Product Desk · Product desk

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
CBRE's Scoring Tech Talent 2026 report, subtitled "AI Realignment Underway", puts the New York metro at 394,300 tech talent jobs in 2025 against 375,730 in the San Francisco Bay Area, the first time New York has led in the 13 years CBRE has been counting [1][2]. That is a gap of 18,570 jobs [3], and it matters less as a coronation than as a signal about where a given kind of engineer is currently sitting. New York did not get there by growing fast. It added 30,640 tech jobs between 2022 and 2025 while the Bay Area lost 23,900, a three-year swing of 54,540 [4][5][6]. Gizmodo notes New York was only the third-largest gainer in absolute terms, behind Toronto and Dallas-Fort Worth [7], and attributes the Bay Area's contraction to post-pandemic layoffs rather than to any political exodus, citing the more than 833,000 tech cuts Layoffs.fyi has tracked since 2022 [8][9]. The ranking, which is a different measurement, did not move at all. CBRE scores 50 markets on 13 weighted metrics covering talent depth, concentration, cost and the education pipeline, and the top six are identical to last year: the Bay Area, Seattle, Toronto, New York Metro, Austin and Washington, D.C. [10][11]. Quartz reported the index scores as 81.98 for the Bay Area against 70.38 for New York Metro, a spread of 11.6 points [12][13]. Austin, the destination executives have been talking up, is still fifth, and Miami does not rank [14]. The composition is the part worth planning around. Quartz put the Bay Area at 98,699 AI workers against New York Metro's 67,949 [15]. Set those against the headcounts, dated a year earlier, and the rough ratios are about 26 percent of Bay Area tech talent in AI roles against about 17 percent in New York [16]. Four metros - the Bay Area, New York, Seattle and Washington - hold 37 percent of American AI-specialty talent [17], and the Bay Area has absorbed 80 percent of US AI venture funding since 2020 on Pitchbook and LinkedIn data cited in the report [18]. Job postings show the same split more sharply. AI roles were 31 percent of available US tech talent jobs in June 2026, up from 11 percent at the mid-2022 hiring peak, and in the Bay Area the share went from 20 percent to 57 percent [19][20]. Non-AI postings have fallen 60 percent across the US and 73 percent in the Bay Area [21]. Both markets carry roughly a third more AI postings than at the 2022 peak while everything else collapsed [22]. If you are hiring outside AI, the Bay Area is now the thinner market for candidates and the deeper one for available people; New York is where the volume of non-AI tech employment sits. The working conditions differ too. Remote postings in the Bay Area fell to 7 percent in April 2026 from 24 percent in mid-2022, against 18 percent across all US tech postings [23]. The report says AI companies largely require full-time in-person work [24], and CBRE's Colin Yasukochi told CNBC staff are in the office "a minimum of four, but usually like five or six days a week" [25]. AI companies took 58 percent of San Francisco leasing in the first half of this year [26]. What to watch: the layoff attribution. CBRE republished Challenger, Gray & Christmas data showing 1.21 million cuts in 2025 against 761,358 in 2024, with tech at a record 31 percent of the 443,604 cuts announced through June [27][28]. Cuts attributed to AI hit 101,743, or 22.9 percent, versus 4.5 percent for all of last year [29]. Challenger counts what employers say, and Salesforce's filings for 133 further cuts this month did not mention AI [30][31].
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
CBRE's Scoring Tech Talent 2026 report is subtitled "AI Realignment Underway" and puts the New York metro at 394,300 tech talent jobs in 2025 against 375,730 in the San Francisco Bay Area.
It is the first time New York has had more tech workers than the San Francisco Bay Area since CBRE started counting 13 years ago.
Between 2022 and 2025 New York added 30,640 tech jobs.
Over the same 2022-2025 period the Bay Area lost 23,900 tech jobs.
New York was the third-largest gainer in tech workers, trailing Toronto and the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
CBRE scores 50 markets on 13 weighted metrics covering talent depth, concentration, cost and education pipeline.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Single primary dataset, specific figures, no independent verification
Every quantitative claim traces to one source document - CBRE's Scoring Tech Talent 2026 - with figures reported consistently by two publishers and index scores relayed via Quartz. The numbers are specific, dated and internally cross-checkable (headcounts, index scores, posting shares, leasing shares, Challenger series), and one publisher discloses the methodology and its limits. What is missing is any independent employment series to corroborate the counts, Bay-Area-specific layoff data, and any coverage outside the US and Canada.
Realignment visible in postings, leasing and cut data
The behavioral evidence is broad rather than anecdotal: AI is 31% of US tech postings and 57% in the Bay Area, non-AI postings are down 60-73%, AI firms took 58% of San Francisco leasing in H1 and ~10M sq ft since 2023, remote postings fell to 7% in the Bay Area, and employers attributed 101,743 cuts to AI through June. These are market-wide measured shares across hiring, real estate and workforce reduction, though all are drawn from the same report package.
Crown framing overstates a narrow, partial crossover
Positive but moderate. The underlying data is solid; the overstatement is in packaging. Headlines treating this as San Francisco losing its tech talent crown collapse two separate measurements: New York's lead is 18,570 jobs, under 5% of either market, while the Bay Area remains first on the weighted scorecard by 11.6 index points and still leads on AI workers and 80% of AI venture funding. New York also grew third-fastest in absolute terms, and part of its lead comes from Bay Area contraction rather than New York outperformance. One publisher in the cluster names this conflation explicitly, which caps the gap.
Brokerage-authored index with in-office and leasing upside
The primary evidence is produced by a commercial real-estate services firm whose revenue depends on office leasing, and the same report emphasizes that AI companies require full-time in-person work, quotes four-to-six office days from its own research lead, and highlights AI's 58% share of San Francisco leasing. The scorecard is CBRE's own weighting of its own 13 metrics with concentration weighted highest. The AI-attributed layoff series compounds this: Challenger records employer statements, and employers have their own reasons to credit or avoid crediting AI, as the Salesforce filing shows. One publisher discloses these conflicts; the other does not.
Numbers reliable, interpretation and causation weaker
Confidence is solid on the reported quantities - two publishers agree on headcounts and the ranking, methodology and vintages are disclosed, and the derived margins are simple arithmetic. It is materially lower on causation and on comparability: the Bay Area contraction mechanism rests on a national layoff proxy, the AI-share-of-headcount ratio mixes 2025 and mid-2026 vintages, AI layoff attribution is self-reported, and the whole dataset comes from a single interested publisher with no European or independent cross-check.
build
Notion's agent stack is live, not slideware, and it only changes one of your decisions1 distinct publisher
build
A green build only proves your agent was consistent with itself1 distinct publisher
security
Passkey enrollment becomes a persistence trick: $10,000 kit outlives the password reset2 distinct publishers
invest
Spark's $22M bet that the agent framework layer can stay independent1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 20, 2026
1 article · August 21, 2026