Skip to content

Science Independently confirmed2 publishers 2 min read Published

Divers find more than 20 stone artefacts at two submerged sites off Murujuga

Archaeologists and Murujuga rangers have documented two seabed sites off Western Australia that were drowned by rising seas at least 9,000 years ago. More than 20 stone artefacts were recovered, and the study says they could be considerably older.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AI Send a correction

Photograph accompanying Divers find more than 20 stone artefacts at two submerged sites off Murujuga
Photo: abc.net.au
Rising seas after the ice age drowned the sites When the new sites were submerged, how much of Australia's shelf rising seas covered, and how long Ngarda-Ngarli people have cared for Murujuga.

The new sites were submerged at least 9,000 and up to 10,000 years ago as seas rose after the last ice age. Over 2 million square kilometres of Australia's continental shelf was submerged. Vincent Adams says Ngarda-Ngarli people have cared for Murujuga for at least 50,000 years.

Rising seas after the ice age drowned the sites
FigureValueNoteClaim
New sites submerged as seas rose, at least9,000 years agoup to 10,000 years ago4
Shelf submerged, over2,000,000 sq km17
Ngarda-Ngarli care for Murujuga, at least50,000 yearsper Vincent Adams11

What happened

  • One site centres on a freshwater spring, and the other is associated with a rocky hill overlooking an ancient river channel.
  • The study comes from Flinders, Western Australia, James Cook and York universities working with Murujuga Aboriginal Corporation rangers who trained as scientific divers.
  • The paper builds on underwater research at Murujuga that began in 2019, at a site 1,250 kilometres north of Perth.

Why it matters

  • constraint Until the stone itself is dated, 9,000 years is a floor set by sea level, and any claim about how much older the tools are has no number behind it.
  • exposure The seabed sites lie off a peninsula that hosts significant industrial development, and the rangers argue the finds are a reason to protect what remains.
  • capability With ranger-divers on staff, Murujuga Aboriginal Corporation can survey its own Sea Country. Director Vincent Adams said such research strengthens its ability to protect the whole cultural landscape.

The paper's central claim, according to the Flinders University account of the study, is that the earlier Murujuga discoveries were not isolated finds but part of a broader submerged cultural landscape [2]. The new evidence for that is two sites and more than 20 stone artefacts [4]. In our view that is enough to show that Aboriginal heritage survives on the seabed there, as the authors say [1]. It is a small sample from which to size a landscape, given that more than 2 million square kilometres of continental shelf went under after the last ice age [17]. Lead researcher Jonathan Benjamin said of Murujuga: "I think there are thousands of underwater sites there potentially." [20] The "I think" and the "potentially" are his.

Sea level supplies the 9,000-year number. The study says the sites were submerged at least 9,000 years ago and that the artifacts could be considerably older [3]. ABC puts the submersion at 9,000 to 10,000 years ago [4]. Neither account explains how the artefacts were dated or how the stone was traced to its source. Audrey Cosmos, deputy chair of Murujuga Aboriginal Corporation, pointed to "further research and scientific dating" as what the find opens up [12].

On the movement of stone, the evidence is firmer. Analysis indicates that some artifacts were made from stone sourced around Rosemary Island, about 23 kilometres from where they were found [6]. ABC reports distances of 20 to 25 kilometres [7]. The hill site was in use when the archipelago was still connected by dry land [14]. Stone found that far from its source was carried there. Benjamin read the pattern as choice: "People are selecting the raw material they prefer, and they're moving it from one upland outcrop all the way across the archipelago," he said [9].

Ranger Richard Variakojis, a co-author, described the spring site in terms of living tradition. "We did find a couple of artefacts in one area that's a submerged freshwater spring that's still sung about in the song lines to this day, even though it's been submerged for thousands of years," he said [16]. Vincent Adams, director of the corporation, said: "The Ngarda-Ngarli people have cared for Murujuga for at least 50,000 years." [11]

The peninsula is also a hub for Western Australia's oil and gas sector, with significant industrial development [18]. Ranger Malik Churnside said: "There's such amazing, beautiful natural sites surrounded by a lot of mining infrastructure, but you can go a long way to protect what is still here." [19]

What to watch

  • Direct dating of the artefacts, which would replace the 9,000-year sea-level floor with an age for the stone.
  • Further dives beyond the two sites, which would test Benjamin's estimate of thousands of submerged sites.
  • Whether management of Murujuga's World Heritage area begins to cover seabed sites near industrial development.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence68
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+15
Incentives40
Confidence65
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    The study, published in Quaternary Science Reviews, shows that significant Aboriginal cultural heritage survives on Australia's seabed.

    Reported Supported Source: Flinders University account via phys.org2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  2. [2]

    The study shows earlier discoveries at Murujuga were not isolated finds but part of a broader submerged cultural landscape across this World Heritage-listed region.

    Reported Supported Source: Flinders University account via phys.org2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  3. [3]

    The sites were submerged at least 9,000 years ago, but the artifacts could be considerably older.

    Reported Supported Source: Flinders University account via phys.org2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

2 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. abc.net.au

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    Newly discovered underwater sites off WA's Burrup Peninsula give clues to ancient ways of life - ABC News
  2. phys.org

    1 article · October 14, 2026

    Australia's oldest underwater archaeology reveals ancient life within a lost landscape

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

  • Underwater archaeologyFollow
  • Indigenous cultural heritageFollow

Entities

Loading related stories