Science1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
Liver samples from 102 caracal deaths show anticoagulant rodenticides accumulating in an apex predator, most of them the potent second-generation compounds still sold over the counter.
The Scientist · Science desk

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Researchers analysed liver samples from 102 caracal deaths collected in and around Cape Town over ten years, mostly animals killed by cars, and found anticoagulant rodenticides in 78% of the samples analysed, with highly toxic second-generation compounds dominating the exposure profile [2][3][7]. The paper, in Environmental Pollution, comes from the Urban Caracal Project at the University of Cape Town's Institute for Communities and Wildlife in Africa with Spanish collaborators at IREC and the Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (CSIC) [1][4]. Taken together, that means pest control bought and applied routinely in homes, businesses and on farms is operating as an unmeasured, uncontrolled dosing program on wildlife.
The detail is worse than the headline rate. Most contaminated individuals carried at least three different compounds, and some livers held up to six [5]. Older animals carried higher burdens, which the authors read as evidence of repeated, long-term cumulative exposure rather than one-off accidents [6]. At 78% of 102 animals, roughly 80 cats tested positive, at an average sampling rate of about ten mortalities a year [21][22].
The mechanism explains why this leaks so reliably out of the target species. Anticoagulant rodenticides block the vitamin K cycle in the liver, stopping blood from clotting and causing fatal internal bleeding in rodents and in any non-target mammal or bird that takes a lethal dose [8]. Second-generation products, developed in the 1970s partly to defeat resistance to the older poisons, are more potent, can be lethal after a single feed, and persist longer in tissue [9][10]. Death is also slow, up to two weeks, so poisoned rodents keep eating and keep accumulating, and arrive in a predator's stomach carrying a concentrated dose [11].
For anyone running a site, the risk map is the useful part. The study found hotspots of higher rodenticide counts and concentrations in caracals using vineyards, wetlands, greener urban areas, and areas with more restaurants, cafes and other food outlets [16]. That is a list of places where bait is deployed continuously because rodent pressure is continuous.
What the poison does short of killing is the open question. Cats tolerate anticoagulants well and rarely die from exposure outright, and the authors are explicit that sublethal effects in caracals are currently unknown [13]. They did find that subadults in poorer body condition carried higher loads [14]. The comparison case is the North American bobcat, where exposure has been associated with inflammation, suppressed immune responses and altered gene activity affecting immune defence, skin integrity and toxin processing, correlated with greater disease susceptibility and particularly with fatal mange [17]. Other wildlife shows impaired clotting, internal bleeding, poorer condition, lethargy, reduced movement and weakened reflexes, effects that could plausibly make an animal worse at fighting infection, hunting or avoiding traffic, though that chain has not been demonstrated in caracals [18]. Senior author Dr Laurel Serieys frames it as quiet attrition: repeated lower exposure "may quietly weaken animals and make it harder for them to cope with disease and other urban dangers" [19].
Lead author Dr Gabriella Leighton, now at Stellenbosch University, calls caracals "red warning lights at the top of the food web" because they move between reserves, farms and suburbs and eat a wide range of prey [12]. Earlier Urban Caracal Project work found the same poisons in otters, large-spotted genets, mongooses, honey badgers and owls near Cape Town [15].
Two things to track. The study could not tie contamination to individual brands, and the practical advice is to read active ingredients and registration numbers, because formulations change and some compounds are being phased out while remaining on shelves [20]. Whether any regulator moves faster than the shelf-clearing schedule is the test.
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
The research comes from the Urban Caracal Project, based in the Institute for Communities and Wildlife in Africa (iCWild) at the University of Cape Town, with international collaborators from the Institute for Game and Wildlife Research (IREC) and the Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (CSIC) in Spain, and finds that rat poisons used in homes, businesses and on farms are moving into South Africa's wildlife.
Researchers analysed liver samples from 102 caracal mortalities collected over 10 years, mainly from car collisions.
Highly toxic anticoagulant rodenticides were present in 78% of the samples analysed.
The paper was published in the journal Environmental Pollution.
Most individuals were exposed to at least three different compounds, and some were found to have up to six compounds in a single sample.
Older animals had higher burdens, supporting the study's conclusion that caracals experience repeated, long-term cumulative exposure to anticoagulant rodenticides in the study area.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Decade-long peer-reviewed sampling, relayed by one outlet
The core numbers rest on a paper in Environmental Pollution built from liver assays of 102 caracal mortalities over ten years, with internal consistency checks (compound counts per animal, age and condition gradients, spatial hotspots). Evidence quality is high for exposure, weaker for consequence: the authors themselves state sublethal effects in caracals are unknown, the sample is drawn mainly from road kills rather than a designed population survey, and the entire record here is one publisher's relay of the research institution's account with no independent review quoted.
Poisons widely in use; mitigation uptake unmeasured
Real-world diffusion of the substances at issue is documented: named second-generation products remain on South African shelves over the counter, detections appear in 78% of sampled caracals and in five other carnivore groups, and hotspots cluster around vineyards, wetlands, greener suburbs and food outlets. What the sources do not measure is uptake of the alternative practices or the regulatory removal the study recommends, and the article notes national sales reporting cannot show who bought or placed a poison, so adoption is scored on poison prevalence only.
Mostly proportionate, with an advocacy tail
The quantitative framing matches the data: 78% of 102 samples is stated plainly, caveats about unknown sublethal effects and failed brand attribution are kept in the text, and the road-collision origin of samples is disclosed. Slight overstatement comes from the surrounding narrative rather than the numbers: 'red warning lights at the top of the food web', imported bobcat immune-suppression findings, and a closing call to strip second-generation products from routine retail all imply population-level harm the study explicitly has not demonstrated in caracals.
Research-institution communication relayed intact
The only source is a science aggregator carrying what reads as an institutional write-up from the Urban Caracal Project, described in the text itself as a research and education initiative, with quotes exclusively from the paper's lead and senior authors. That group has a legitimate interest in visibility for its findings and in the policy outcome the piece endorses, and the concluding consumer guidance, product naming and support for retail removal are advocacy positions carried without manufacturer or regulator reply. There is no disclosed funding conflict and the study's limitations are stated, which tempers the score.
Solid primary study, thin corroboration
Confidence is held mid-range: the underlying measurements are peer-reviewed, quantified and caveated, but the cluster contains exactly one publisher, no independent expert or regulator, no manufacturer response, and no second reporting of the paper. Exposure claims can be relied on; consequence, market and policy implications cannot be checked against anything in the supplied record.
science
Two large whales, 100 records, 60 years: the southeast Atlantic finally has a baseline1 distinct publisher
science
A 120-million-year reference section gets a rebuild: the Karoo synthesis1 distinct publisher
science
A spiral galaxy at redshift 2 suggests Webb's little red dots are partly a resolution problem1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 19, 2026