Skip to content

Written by AI.How we work

Science1 publisherNot yet confirmed elsewhere2 min readPublished

Interviews find separate commercial and tribal native seed systems on the Northern Great Plains

South Dakota State University researchers interviewed 60 people in Northern Great Plains native seed work and found separate commercial and tribal systems. Their account warns that merging the two to raise seed output could misread what the tribal network values.

The Scientist · Science desk

Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying Interviews find separate commercial and tribal native seed systems on the Northern Great Plains
Generated illustration

What happened

  • Participants in the commercial network collect, produce, sell and use native seed for restoration.
  • Tribal participants count restoration as one goal but take a community-based approach, using seed for food and medicine and weighing reciprocity and sovereignty.
  • The work followed the Northern Great Plains Native Seed Partnership's Native Seed Strategy, which called for a better understanding of the seed system's social side.
  • Elena Friedman, an August 2026 master's graduate, is first author, and Native Plant Initiative director Lora Perkins also worked on the study.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • decision A seed-supply program in the region now has to say which network it is built for, since a single output target matches the commercial system's goals and only part of the tribal system's.
  • constraint Restoration seed budgets still have to be set from supply figures; an interview map of who holds seed tells planners whom to work with and leaves open how much to grow.
  • precedent Evidence of more than one seed system in a single region makes plans built around one regional supply chain harder to defend, starting with the partnership that asked for this mapping.

"Native seed systems often have ecological, production or technological challenges," said Jennifer Zavaleta Cheek, an assistant professor in South Dakota State University's Department of Natural Resource Management [4]. Her team at the university's Native Plant Initiative wanted to know how the regional seed system worked and how to support the networks already in it [3]. "We used social science and resilience and systems thinking to understand the people and relationships that make restoration possible," she said [5].

An interview study is a good instrument for one job: checking whether your picture of a system has the right parts. This one found it did not. "We went into the research thinking there was a singular system, but instead we found distinct seed systems operating in the same region, with different people, relationships and goals," Zavaleta Cheek said [8]. The paper appears in People and Nature [6].

The result bears on how support gets designed. According to the university's account of the work, earlier research without a close look at each group's goals and practices might have concluded that integrating the commercial and tribal systems would benefit both by increasing production [1]. That conclusion scores both networks on one measure. Seed volume is the commercial network's main output, and only one goal among several in the tribal network [9][10].

The interviews make a case for investing in the people and relationships inside these networks. They do not show that relationships limit restoration more than growing capacity does, and Zavaleta Cheek's own wording keeps both in play. "Building resilience isn't only about having enough seed or the right infrastructure. It is also about strengthening the relationships, knowledge, values and institutions that allow people and native landscapes to thrive together over time," she said [2]. The thing this doesn't tell you is how much seed either network produces or lacks. The university's account does not include seed volumes.

The team's own plans treat seed quantity as a live gap. With Native Plant Initiative support, the researchers hope to work with specialty crop farmers to produce native seed and raise production capacity and supply for restoration projects [12]. They will also study wild foods and the role they play in resilient food systems [11].

The group says it wants the findings to reach people anywhere in the seed system, including those outside it entirely [13]. "One takeaway I hope people have from our work is that plants and landscapes are cultural," Zavaleta Cheek said [14].

What to watch

  • Whether the specialty crop farmer work produces measurable gains in restoration seed supply, which would show how much of the gap is production capacity.
  • Whether the Northern Great Plains Native Seed Partnership revises its Native Seed Strategy to plan for the commercial and tribal systems separately.
  • Whether follow-up work puts seed volumes on each network, so social and production limits can be compared directly.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls