Skip to content

Product Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

ORNL says 3D-printed composite forms cut nuclear concrete mold lead time from six months to two weeks

ORNL says its 3D-printed composite forms cut lead time for specialized nuclear concrete molds from about six months to about two weeks. The forms are in full-scale demonstration on the Oak Ridge campus where Kairos Power is building its Hermes reactor.

The Product Desk

Send a correction

Kairos plans printed forms for portions of Hermes Who ORNL's printed composite forms reach: the Hermes build team, shielding-panel designs, reactor build times and future advanced reactor projects.

Kairos Power plans such forms for portions of Hermes. Barnard Construction's feedback led to design changes. Shielding panels get grout-free joints hard to make in steel. Faster forms bring no guaranteed cut in reactor build time. ORNL says it is helping set up a supply chain for future reactors.

Kairos plans printed forms for portions of Hermes
WhoHowKindClaim
Kairos PowerPlans to use forms like the demonstration ones for portions of the Hermes reactor facilitydecision2
Barnard ConstructionGave feedback during implementation, leading to design changes for deploying the forms on sitecapability3
Radiation-shielding panel designsInterlocking joints for grout-free assembly, a geometry hard to make with steel moldscapability7
Nuclear projectsFaster form production carries no guaranteed cut in overall reactor build timeconstraint10
Future advanced reactor projectsORNL says it is helping set up an additive manufacturing supply chain for nuclear constructionexposure12

What happened

  • The project, "Advanced Composite Formwork for Accelerated High-Precision Nuclear Infrastructure," won the 2026 CAMX Combined Strength Award.
  • The forms are fiber-reinforced composite and include interlocking joints designed for grout-free assembly of radiation-shielding panels, a geometry that is hard to make in steel.
  • In the Janus demonstration, three sections of 10 feet by 10 feet were stacked into a cast-in-place concrete shielding column.
  • ORNL reports the forms held one-sixteenth of an inch on critical surfaces while withstanding the pressure of the concrete they shape.
  • The demonstration forms are precursors to those Kairos Power and Barnard Construction plan to use for portions of the Hermes facility.

Why it matters

  • Who has to decide decision Anyone specifying formwork for complex shielding has a new item to put to suppliers: whether a printed composite form can replace the steel order on a joint-heavy design.
  • What it limits constraint The two-week figure is ORNL's own, relayed by one outlet, so it supports a request for quotes more than a rebuilt schedule baseline.
  • What it sets up precedent ORNL says the project is helping set up an additive manufacturing supply chain for nuclear construction, so other advanced reactor builders could be offered the same forms.

Barnard Construction, the construction partner on the Kairos Power work, gave feedback while the forms were in use, and the ORNL team changed the design to meet construction requirements [3]. A change of that kind is cheap only if the next mold arrives fast. On the figures ORNL gave, a printed form arrives in about one-thirteenth of the time a steel mold takes [13].

A reader skimming a months-to-weeks headline may assume a faster mold means a faster reactor. The report is more careful. The demonstration shows the technology on specific concrete structures, and Interesting Engineering, the outlet reporting the award, says that does not mean the entire Hermes facility is being built with 3D-printed formwork [9]. It says the immediate benefit is faster production of specialized forms and that a shorter reactor build is not guaranteed, because nuclear projects still face regulatory and other construction requirements [10].

ORNL frames the work as a change in how reactors are built. "Accelerating advanced nuclear deployment requires rethinking how we build, not just how we design reactors," said Ahmed Arabi Hassen, group leader of Composites Innovation at ORNL [11]. The report does not give a cost per form or say how many pours a reusable form survives.

The buyer is the owner or contractor who has to order specialized forms for a complex shielding structure. We would use the two-week figure [8] to request quotes and hold the schedule baseline until a delivered form is in hand. The cost of that caution is that any gain stays on paper in the meantime.

Two inputs sort the decision: whether the mold sits on your critical path, and whether the design is still moving. On the critical path with a moving design, the two-week figure matters most. On the critical path with a settled design, a steel wait of about six months [8] can be ordered around, so the saving is smaller. Off the critical path with a moving design, lead time costs no schedule, and the open point is whether a printed form cuts rework. Off the critical path with a settled design, we would stay with steel.

What to watch

  • A Hermes pour that uses production forms from Kairos Power and Barnard, as opposed to the Janus precursors.
  • A published cost per form and a count of pours each reusable form survives, from ORNL or its partners.
  • Orders from other advanced reactor builders through the supply chain ORNL describes.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence40
Adoption20
Hype gap+15
Incentives
Not scored
Confidence50
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    In the Janus demonstration, a cast-in-place concrete shielding structure, each section measures 10 feet by 10 feet, with three sections stacked to create a column.

    Reported Supported Source: Interesting Engineering2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  2. [2]

    The demonstration forms are precursors to those Kairos Power and construction partner Barnard Construction plan to use for portions of the Hermes reactor facility.

    Reported Supported Source: Interesting Engineering2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  3. [3]

    Barnard Construction provided feedback during implementation, allowing the team to make design changes based on construction requirements and improve how the forms could be deployed on site.

    Reported Supported Source: Interesting Engineering2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. interestingengineering.com

    1 article · October 15, 2026

    3D-printed composite forms could cut nuclear construction time from months to weeks

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Loading related stories