Skip to content

Science2 publishers2 min readPublished

Niobium-rich white dwarf points to a planet built from material its own star cast off

Warwick-led astronomers tie niobium at over 1,000 times solar levels in a white dwarf to a candidate planet made from what the star shed as it died. If it holds up, it shows planets can still form after a star has died.

The Scientist · Science desk

Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

What happened

  • The heavy elements surfaced when the team reanalysed Hubble observations from 1999, whose mix of chemicals astronomers could not identify at the time.
  • This is the first niobium detected in any white dwarf, and the atmosphere also carries zinc and copper, elements made as stars die.
  • NASA's TESS satellite recorded a faint brightness signal from the system that repeats every 4.4 days.
  • The team expects the planet's outer atmosphere to be boiling off under the star's radiation, with the gas raining onto the white dwarf to produce its chemistry.
  • Similar reborn worlds have been suspected around pulsars, which are much rarer stellar remnants than white dwarfs.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint If an isolated dying star sheds mass too evenly to build a disk, reborn planets are limited to systems with a companion that pulls the ejecta back, so a common host type does not mean common planets.
  • capability Astronomers can now hunt for more reborn worlds by screening other white dwarf spectra for the same carbon and heavy-element signature.
  • contradiction The Warwick release says the team discovered the planet, while the paper's own title calls it a candidate and Science News counts it as a first only if confirmed.

Niobium is the clue because of where it is made. It forms in the slow neutron-capture process, or s-process, which runs mostly in certain red giant stars as they shed their atmospheres and die [8]. "It's a chemical signature no ordinary, 'first-generation' planet should carry," said Nicholas Stone of the University of Wisconsin-Madison [2].

The contrast with other polluted white dwarfs is sharp. According to Science News, astronomers have found that between a quarter and half of white dwarfs carry elements such as silicon and iron, probably from rocky planets the star destroyed [16]. HS 0209+0832 has only trace silicon and almost no iron [18]. "We've never observed anything in the universe that's this niobium-rich before," said Jamie Williams, the Warwick doctoral student who is the paper's first author [7] [19].

The team's preferred explanation has two steps. Material the dying star threw off formed a new disk, and a giant planet condensed out of it, rich in the star's own heavy elements [13].

That first step is hard. "A single, isolated star dies and sheds mass in a roughly symmetrical way," Williams said. "To form a disk of material necessary to birth a planet, HS 0209+0832 likely required a companion star that pulled the ejected material back into orbit, rather than letting it escape." [23]

The light signal is weaker evidence. It is consistent with a tidally locked, Jupiter-sized gas giant [4] about 6 million kilometres from the white dwarf, roughly 4 percent of the Earth-sun distance [10]. The team found the period too slow to come from the white dwarf's own rotation, so spin is ruled out [9]. Williams did not claim more than that. "We're not really sure, if it's not a planet, what it is," he said. "A planet is the most reasonable explanation." [11] The thing this doesn't tell you is the object's mass. The Jupiter size is what the signal fits [4], and it was not measured directly.

Zifan Lin, a planetary scientist at Washington University in St. Louis who was not involved, said that before this work the process was "more like a hypothesis, more like speculation." [15] "This is the first time we've seen evidence for that process," he said [15]. Theorists predicted second-generation planets more than 15 years ago [6]. I think the chemistry is strong enough to take seriously. The planet is still one candidate, around one star, and it needs confirmation [6].

What to watch

  • Independent follow-up confirming that the object orbiting HS 0209+0832 is a planet, the condition both reports attach to the claim.
  • Direct evidence of the companion star that Williams says the disk probably needed to form.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories