Skip to content

ScienceNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished

Nature urges Nobel bodies to widen who nominates after men took every 2026 science and economics prize

Nature says the Nobel bodies should widen who is invited to nominate, after men won every 2026 chemistry, physics, medicine and economics prize. Its case turns on the invitation letters, and the counts it cites are too small to show whether the 2018 outreach worked.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Nature urges Nobel bodies to widen who nominates after men took every 2026 science and economics prize
Photo: nature.com
Science Nobels to women rose in 2019-2026 Women among science Nobel winners per eight-year period, and women's share of invited nominators after the 2018 move, per Nature.

Key figures per Nature: seven women won science Nobels in 2019-2026, against four in 2011-2018. Women are some 40% of the nominators invited by letter after the 2018 move to widen nominations.

Science Nobels to women rose in 2019-2026
FigureValueNoteClaim
Women awarded science Nobels, 2019-20267 women5
Women winners, 2011-20184 women6
Women among invited nominators, some40%after 2018, letters to more universities11

What happened

  • Women took two other 2026 prizes: Navanethem Pillay won the Peace Prize on 9 October and Anne Carson the literature prize the day before.
  • A representative of the committees told Nature that members care deeply about the imbalance and are determined to see change.
  • In 2018 the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences wrote to eligible nominators, asking more women to propose candidates and asking all to weigh gender, geography and topic.
  • Under the statutes Nature cites, direct nominators are limited to previous laureates, professors in five Nordic countries, academy members and committee members.
  • Other senior scientists can nominate only once one of the awarding bodies has sent their institution a formal invitation letter.

Why it matters

  • decision The Nobel bodies can accept help from university and scientific networks that, Nature says, offered in 2024 to work with them on widening nominations.
  • exposure Nature says the awarding bodies face growing pressure and attempts at interference from governments, and argues that is a further reason to build global alliances.
  • capability Organisers of newer prizes for women and other under-represented researchers have experience the Nobel bodies could draw on, according to Nature.

The counts behind the editorial are small, and one of them can be read two ways. Nature reports that science Nobels went to seven women from 2019 to 2026 [5], against four in 2011-2018 and five in 2003-2010 [6]. That is three and two more [17]. Yet four of the eight recent years had no women among the winners [5], which is half of them [18], and 2026 follows clean sweeps for men, most recently in 2021 and 2024 [3].

For the two earlier periods, Nature says there were five years in which only men won [7]. The wording allows five in each period or five across both. Five of 16 years is about 31%, and five of eight is about 63% [19]. On the combined reading the recent record is worse than the earlier one on this measure. On the per-period reading it is better.

The letters are the part of the pool the bodies choose themselves, since they come from the prize-awarding bodies [10]. After the 2018 outreach, letters went to more universities worldwide, and women now make up some 40% of this group of nominators, Nature says [11]. It wrote that this "bodes well for the future" [12]. The thing this doesn't tell you is how many of the people nominated are women. The 40% is a share of nominators.

Nature stops short of calling the process the cause. It wrote that one barrier to more rapid change "could be the nominations process itself" [15]. The sequence is suggestive: outreach in 2018 [8], then more women among laureates [17]. A gap of two or three laureates between eight-year periods is thin ground for crediting a letter campaign. The statutes Nature cites are the academy's for chemistry and physics and the Karolinska Institute's for physiology or medicine [16], so the economics prize, which also went to men, sits outside the mechanism the editorial describes.

We think the letters are the right place to look, because the bodies send them and so control that part of the pool. We would hold the causal claim until there is a count of nominees to set beside the count of nominators.

What to watch

  • Whether the Nobel bodies take up the networks' offer and send invitation letters to a wider set of universities.
  • Whether the committees report the share of women among nominees, to set beside the 40% share among nominators.
  • Whether women appear among the 2027 science laureates, keeping in mind that eight-year counts of five, four and seven are too small to settle the question.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence58
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+15
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence50
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    The 2026 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to Navanethem 'Navi' Pillay on 9 October, and the previous day the Nobel Prize in Literature was awarded to Anne Carson.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Nature editorialView cited source
  2. [2]

    All of the 2026 prizewinners in chemistry, economics, physics and physiology or medicine are men.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Nature editorialView cited source
  3. [3]

    The absence of women from the economics and science categories this year echoes previous clean sweeps for men, most recently in 2021 and 2024.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Nature editorialView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. nature.com

    1 article · October 12, 2026

    Diversify Nobel-prize nominations before it’s too late

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories