Skip to content

ScienceNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished

Controlling local pH at the electrode lifted desired product from 16% to 97% in an electrosynthesis

Seoul National University researchers raised the desired product share from about 16% to 97% by controlling acidity near electrodes. The route uses oxygen and electricity instead of added peroxides, and the figures come from the university's own summary.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Controlling local pH at the electrode lifted desired product from 16% to 97% in an electrosynthesis
Photo: phys.org

What happened

  • The paper in the Journal of the American Chemical Society comes from a group led by Professor Jaeyune Ryu of Seoul National University's Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering.
  • The factor is local pH, the acidity or alkalinity in the immediate surroundings of an electrode, which can differ sharply from the pH of the bulk solution.
  • The work targeted lactones, used for biodegradable plastics and polyurethanes, and epoxides, used for adhesives, protective coatings and epoxy resins.

Why it matters

  • constraint The levers are electrode spacing and flow, so we'd expect the 97% to depend on holding both fixed when the reactor is made larger.
  • decision Groups running electrosynthesis have to decide whether to measure or model pH at the electrode surface, since a bulk reading can look right while the surface is not.
  • precedent Electrosyntheses that stalled at low selectivity become candidates for a retest, if local pH was the variable nobody controlled.

The release names three ways a pH gradient at an electrode can interfere: it can change how reactive oxygen species are produced, alter how the starting molecules behave, and decide whether the finished product survives [9]. The last of these complicates the headline figure. A low share of desired product can mean the reaction went the wrong way, or that the right product formed and then broke down. The two call for different fixes.

The gain is 81 percentage points [13], a rise of about sixfold in the share [14]. A share is a ratio among what formed. It does not say how much starting material was converted, how much current the reaction drew, or how fast it ran. The release does not report which of the two chemical families produced the 16% and 97% figures, what conditions gave the 16%, or what control experiments separated local pH from the other changes in the reactor.

That gap matters because the team redesigned the reactor to control both the distance between electrodes and the movement of liquid through it [7]. Both can change more than pH. We think the local-pH explanation is plausible, since the release describes protons being made or removed faster than they move through the liquid [6]. But the 97% alone cannot show that pH is the only cause. A run that varied pH with spacing and flow held fixed, if the paper has one, would settle it.

According to the release, much of the earlier work on organic electrosynthesis centered on voltage, electrode materials and the composition of the liquid [10]. Those are properties of the whole cell. The release says the bulk solution can look chemically correct and the reaction can still fail [12]. If that holds, a bulk pH reading will miss the problem.

The comparison a plant would make is against the agents being replaced. The release says some oxidizing and reducing agents are hazardous to handle and generate unwanted waste [11]. A plant would weigh that against the electricity the route consumes and the reactor tolerances it needs.

What to watch

  • Whether the JACS paper varied local pH alone, with electrode spacing and flow held fixed.
  • Conversion, current efficiency and throughput figures, which a selectivity number does not supply.
  • Whether other groups see the same effect in reactions beyond lactones and epoxides.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+35
Incentives55
Confidence50
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Researchers raised the proportion of the desired product from approximately 16% to 97% by controlling tiny changes in acidity near electrodes.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Seoul National University College of Engineering release, carried by ScienceDailyView cited source
  2. [2]

    The work was led by Professor Jaeyune Ryu of the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering at Seoul National University College of Engineering.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Seoul National University College of Engineering release, carried by ScienceDailyView cited source
  3. [3]

    The findings were published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society (JACS).

    ReportedSupportedSource: Seoul National University College of Engineering release, carried by ScienceDailyView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. sciencedaily.com

    1 article · October 11, 2026

    Scientists discover a hidden factor that can make or break chemical reactions

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Loading related stories