Skip to content

Invest Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Bristlemoon's fund fell 8.4% in the quarter even with ASML, Sandisk and Lam Research contributing

Bristlemoon Global Fund lost 8.4% in the September 2026 quarter, net of fees, though ASML, Sandisk and Lam Research helped in September. Its manager blames a narrow market, with the S&P 500 2% off its high and 83% of members more than 10% off theirs.

The Investor · Invest desk

How we use AI Send a correction

Illustration accompanying Bristlemoon's fund fell 8.4% in the quarter even with ASML, Sandisk and Lam Research contributing
Generated illustration
S&P 500 is near its high; most members are not Distance from 52-week highs at the end of September 2026: the S&P 500 index and the share of its members, per Bristlemoon's letter.

Three figures for the end of September 2026: the S&P 500 was 2% below its 52-week high, 83% of its members were more than 10% below their 52-week highs, and 42% were more than 20% below theirs.

S&P 500 is near its high; most members are not
FigureValueNoteClaim
S&P 500 below its 52-week high, end of September 20262%9
S&P 500 members more than 10% below 52-week high83% of membersat the end of September 202610
S&P 500 members more than 20% below 52-week high42% of membersat the end of September 202611

What happened

  • PAR Technology, Hemnet Group and Baltic Classifieds Group were the notable detractors over the same September period.
  • Nine of the S&P 500's 11 sectors declined in September, according to the fund's letter.
  • The fund's net exposure has drifted lower because it found more shorts in stocks that have not priced in rising yields and inflation from the Iran war.
  • The letter does not recap the fund's theses and offers investors meetings or calls to discuss them.

Why it matters

  • contradiction Owning some of the winners did not save the month: the letter says the fund was historically underexposed to the semiconductor and AI infrastructure names behind nine of the ten top contributors, so everything else outweighed the three it held.
  • exposure Most index members are in a drawdown the headline hides, and 41% of them (83% more than 10% down, less 42% more than 20% down) sit in the 10% to 20% band.
  • cost Investors who stay need a gain of about 9.2% to recover the quarter's 8.4% loss, before any fees on the way back.

The loss is back-loaded. The fund returned -5.9% net of fees in September [2] against -8.4% for the quarter [1], and compounding the two back out leaves about -2.7% for July and August together [14]. Most of the letter's market evidence is measured over the year to 30 September, a longer window than the quarter [6].

The concentration argument is the letter's strongest, and its figures hold together. The ten largest stocks were 39% of the S&P 500 at 30 September [5], so the 70% of the year's return that came from the top ten contributors [6] is about 1.8 times their weight [15]. Treat 1.8 as an indication. One figure is a year-end weight, the other a full-year contribution, and the letter does not say the two groups are the same ten names.

The explanation for the fund's own holdings carries a hedge. The letter says the managers "strongly believe that these steep price declines are unwarranted and partly reflect broader market rotations" [20]. "Partly" leaves a share of the decline to causes inside the companies.

The managers say the holdings are worth more than the market is paying for them. The letter says they "remain very confident in their prospects and compelling value" [19]. The market's verdict on those holdings was down 8.4% in a quarter. The text available to us does not say how large the company-specific share of the decline is, why the three September detractors fell, or what the fund's one-year return, the quarter's benchmark return or any position size was. The letter contains context on the market, a section on AI and investing, and write-ups on four shorts, Campbell's, REA Group, Masterbrand and Polaris [12], with no long-side write-up listed.

We think the letter's diagnosis of the index holds on its own numbers and its diagnosis of the fund is unproven. Three outcomes would separate them. If breadth returns and the three September detractors recover, rotation was the cause and the value claim stands. If the AI leaders keep going while the fund's longs keep falling, "partly" was the operative word and the theses are what failed. If yields and inflation from the Iran war [18] reach the stocks the fund is short before they reach its longs, the short book carries the next quarter under either of the first two.

What to watch

  • The fund's next quarterly letter: whether its September detractors (PAR Technology, Hemnet, Baltic Classifieds) appear among contributors or the AI leaders keep supplying the winners.
  • Breadth in the S&P 500: whether the 83% of members more than 10% below their highs narrows while the index stays within 2% of its own.
  • Whether rising yields and Iran-war inflation reach the four shorts (Campbell's, REA Group, Masterbrand, Polaris) before they reach the fund's longs.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence50
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+20
Incentives75
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    The Bristlemoon Global Fund returned -8.4 percent for the September 2026 quarter, net of fees.

    Reported Supported Source: Bristlemoon Global Fund Q3 2026 reportView cited source
  2. [2]

    The fund returned -5.9 percent for the month of September 2026, net of fees.

    Reported Supported Source: Bristlemoon Global Fund Q3 2026 reportView cited source
  3. [3]

    Key performance contributors in the month of September included ASML, Sandisk and Lam Research.

    Reported Supported Source: Bristlemoon Global Fund Q3 2026 reportView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. seekingalpha.com

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    Bristlemoon Global Fund Q3 2026 Report

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Loading related stories