Invest1 publisherNot yet confirmed elsewhere2 min readPublished
Binance is still verifying EU users 49 days after MiCA's deadline, tests indicate
Independent testing says new European accounts were opened, verified and funded in mid-August, seven weeks past the MiCA cutoff. The exchange appears on neither of ESMA's two lists.
The Investor · Invest desk
What happened
- Binance withdrew its Greek MiCA application in late June 2026, amid reports the Hellenic Capital Market Commission was preparing to reject it.
- Analysis platform Sandmark says its mid-August testing completed identity verification on new accounts using European IDs and addresses from five countries.
- In at least two of those cases the accounts reached full verification and were able to accept crypto deposits, according to the testers.
- ESMA's register of authorized crypto-asset service providers listed roughly 330 firms in late August, and no Binance entity was among them.
Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- cost Authorized firms bought their licences partly by giving up new EU signups on July 1; the venue with more volume than any of them kept both the revenue and the funnel.
- exposure A Belgian user contracting with a Polish entity, paid via Bahraini affiliates and settled through a Georgian bank, has no MiCA-authorized counterparty to complain about.
- precedent If the first MiCA penalty in Austria falls on procedural and marketing failings at a smaller platform, the pricing signal is that filing badly costs more than not filing.
- contradiction Binance says availability was aligned with the law and turns on transitional rules and individual circumstances; the testers describe accounts created from scratch and funded.
Passporting is the part of MiCA that makes this an enforcement problem rather than a drafting one. One national regulator authorizes a crypto-asset service provider, and the licence then works across the European Economic Area [4]. The reward for granting sits with a single member state; the cost of policing a firm that never got authorized is spread across all the rest.
Binance told users in France, Italy, Spain, Poland, Belgium and Sweden that new registrations, deposits and certain yield products would be limited from July 1 [8], and said it would pursue authorization in another EU jurisdiction [9]. For a firm in that position, ESMA's instruction is narrow: activity should be confined mainly to helping existing clients exit [6].
Sandmark's dated test account puts 49 days between the deadline and a new, fully verified European customer able to receive crypto [19]. None of the registration flows it ran displayed any notice that the exchange lacks MiCA authorization [11], which is the least expensive obligation on the list and the one a firm actually winding down would have the least reason to skip.
The control in the experiment is the more informative half. A connection from the United States was routed to Binance.US, with deposits and trading disabled [13]. European connections progressed through onboarding whether or not a VPN was in use [2]. So the capacity to sort users by location and stop them exists in the product and is switched on for one jurisdiction [21].
On the European record, meanwhile, nothing has happened in either direction. The exchange is on neither the register of authorized providers nor the list of entities flagged for unauthorized activity [20], which leaves the largest exchange by trading volume [3] in a category the framework does not really maintain. That silence is doing work. Every firm that did get authorized accepted the July 1 halt on onboarding, the stop on marketing to EU residents and a wind-down plan as the price of the licence [5]. A firm larger by volume than any of them [22] continued to take signups, according to the mid-August testing, and has been asked to explain none of it.
The interesting question for anyone who did comply is not whether Binance eventually files somewhere else. It is what the register now measures. Right now it records which firms chose to be inside the regime, not which firms are subject to it.
What to watch
- Whether any national regulator or ESMA adds Binance entities to the unauthorized-activity list, which would be the first formal contradiction of the exchange's account.
- Which member state receives Binance's next MiCA application, and whether the withdrawn Greek file is disclosed in it.
- Whether a retest shows the European onboarding flows closed, and what happens to accounts opened after July 1.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence54
- Adoption58
- Hype gap+18
- Incentives60
- Confidence46
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
Reports indicate Binance has continued to allow new customers from European Union countries to open and verify accounts well after the July 1, 2026 deadline under the Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation.
ReportedSupportedSource: crowdfundinsider.com, citing reports2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source - [2]
Independent testing in mid-August 2026 by crypto analysis platform Sandmark found restrictions on new accounts had not been fully implemented; staff registered and completed KYC using European identity documents and residential addresses from Austria, France, Germany, Spain and Belgium, both with and without VPNs.
ReportedSupportedSource: Sandmark testing, reported by crowdfundinsider.com2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source - [3]
Binance remains the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume.
- [4]
MiCA requires crypto-asset service providers to obtain authorization from a national regulator in one member state, which then enables passporting of services across the entire European Economic Area.
- [5]
Firms lacking MiCA approval were instructed to halt new client onboarding, stop marketing to EU residents, and implement orderly wind-down plans by the deadline.
- [6]
ESMA emphasized that unauthorized entities must restrict activities primarily to facilitating client exits while protecting user interests and market integrity.
- [7]
Binance pursued a MiCA licence through Greece but withdrew its application in late June 2026 amid reports that the Hellenic Capital Market Commission was prepared to reject it.
- [8]
Binance notified users in several countries, including France, Italy, Spain, Poland, Belgium and Sweden, that it would limit new registrations, deposits and certain yield products starting July 1.
- [9]
Binance maintained that customer assets would remain accessible and that it intended to seek authorization in another EU jurisdiction.
- [10]
In at least two cases, test accounts reached full verification and could accept cryptocurrency deposits.
- [11]
None of the registration flows tested displayed warnings indicating that Binance lacked MiCA authorization.
- [12]
One account created on August 19 using a European ID and address was verified and funded with crypto; it had not existed prior to the July deadline.
- [13]
Access from a US location redirected users to the restricted Binance.US platform, where deposits and trading were disabled.
- [14]
Binance's terms for some users, such as those in Belgium, reference contracting with a Polish entity, with payment processing involving affiliates in Bahrain and settlement through a Georgian bank.
- [15]
Neither Binance nor its related entities appear on ESMA's register of authorized crypto-asset service providers, which listed around 330 approved firms as of mid-to-late August.
- [16]
Binance is also absent from ESMA's separate list of entities flagged for unauthorized activity.
- [17]
Binance said it has taken steps to align product availability in Europe with applicable legal frameworks, that availability can depend on jurisdiction, transitional rules, specific products and individual circumstances, and it declined to address specific onboarding cases.
- [18]
Austria's Financial Market Authority recently issued its first MiCA-related fine against another platform for procedural and marketing shortcomings.
- [19]
The account created and funded on August 19 came 49 days after the July 1, 2026 MiCA deadline.
- [20]
Binance appears on neither ESMA's register of authorized providers nor its list of entities flagged for unauthorized activity, so the EU record shows neither approval nor objection.
- [21]
The same onboarding infrastructure hard-blocks a US connection while letting European connections through with or without a VPN, so location-based gating is present and active for at least one jurisdiction.
- [22]
As the largest exchange by trading volume globally, Binance is larger than any of the roughly 330 firms on ESMA's authorized register that are bearing MiCA obligations.
Sources
1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.
Topics and entities
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Topics
- EU Financial Regulatory EnforcementFollow
- Crypto Exchange ComplianceFollow
- MiCA RegulationFollow
- KYC and Onboarding ControlsFollow
Entities
- BinanceFollow
- Binance.USFollow
- European Securities and Markets AuthorityFollow
- Markets in Crypto-Assets RegulationFollow
- SandmarkFollow
- Hellenic Capital Market CommissionFollow
- Austrian Financial Market AuthorityFollow