Skip to content

Science Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Before PWDA's leadership program began, 82% of surveyed women reported barriers to leadership

People with Disability Australia says 82% of surveyed women in its 107-woman leadership program reported barriers before joining. The report urges employers to remove them, but the percentages are participants' own survey answers.

The Scientist · Science desk

Send a correction

Illustration accompanying Before PWDA's leadership program began, 82% of surveyed women reported barriers to leadership
Generated illustration
Most surveyed women also reported low confidence Shares of surveyed participants reporting each before taking part, per PWDA's report. The national project reached 107 women with disability.

Key figures from PWDA's report: more than 60% of surveyed participants reported low confidence in progressing into leadership roles before participating; 82% reported barriers to leadership opportunities; the project reached 107 women with disability.

Most surveyed women also reported low confidence
FigureValueNoteClaim
Low confidence in moving into leadership, more than60% surveyed4
Reported barriers82% surveyed3
Women reached107 women2

What happened

  • More than 60% of surveyed participants also reported low confidence in progressing into leadership roles before taking part.
  • The barriers they named were inaccessible workplace practices, discrimination, limited career development and cultures that fail to recognize their leadership potential.
  • Of post-program survey respondents, 71% named mentoring as the most valuable part of the program.

Why it matters

  • What doesn't add up contradiction The program's best-rated element works on the individual, and the report finds that individual development alone cannot overcome the structural barriers it documents.
  • What it limits constraint No employer can treat 82% as a benchmark for its own staff: the survey group is of unstated size and limited to program participants.
  • What it sets up precedent The recommendation for flexible, participant-centered evaluation suggests the next round of evidence will again rest largely on what participants report, and we'd expect the same limits.

The 107 is the number of women the project reached. The percentages come from survey respondents. Of the 107, 46 were mentors and 46 were mentees [2], which accounts for 92 [14] and leaves 15 whom the published account does not place in either role [15]. The 82% is a share of "surveyed participants" [3]. The 71% is a share of "post-program survey respondents" [7]. The article does not say how many women answered either survey or whether any comparison group existed.

Some numbers are sturdier than others. The 82% and the 60% describe the women's situation before the program, as the women themselves reported it [3][4]. As descriptions they hold up without a control group, though they are only as representative as the unstated group of respondents.

The confidence gain afterwards is a direction: participants reported greater confidence, stronger professional connections and clearer career goals [6]. There is no measure of its size, or of how much of that change the program produced, as against time passing or the other elements of the program.

The 71% needs the same care. It ranks the parts of the program against one another by what participants valued [7].

Dr. Michelle Hyde, a co-author of the final report, placed the barriers on the employer side. "What became clear was that the barriers to progression were often embedded in workplace cultures, practices and expectations," she said [9]. Summah McKinnon, the project manager, who is herself a woman with disability, put it from the inside [11]. "Women with disability have the skills, experience and ambition to lead, but too often we're expected to navigate workplaces and systems that weren't designed with us in mind," McKinnon said [10].

In our view the descriptive claim is well supported by what participants said: barriers were common, and the women locate them in workplaces. The call on employers follows from that testimony. The first of the six recommendations is organizational commitment and accountability [12].

What to watch

  • The final report's respondent counts for each survey, and any before-and-after confidence figures.
  • Whether participating employers publish changes to how they recruit, support and promote women with disability, with outcomes.
  • Whether PWDA's next program adds a comparison group or keeps the participant-centered evaluation it recommends.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence35
Adoption15
Hype gap+20
Incentives60
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    A new report from People with Disability Australia (PWDA) says employers must do more to remove the barriers preventing women with disability from progressing into leadership.

    Reported Supported Source: PWDA report, as reported by phys.orgView cited source
  2. [2]

    The national project, which ran from January 2023 to July 2026, reached 107 women with disability, including 46 mentors and 46 mentees.

    Reported Supported Source: PWDA report, as reported by phys.orgView cited source
  3. [3]

    Before participating, 82% of surveyed participants reported experiencing barriers to leadership opportunities.

    Reported Supported Source: PWDA report, as reported by phys.orgView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. phys.org

    1 article · October 15, 2026

    Six lessons to improve leadership opportunities for women with disability

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories