Skip to content

Leadership Not yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher 2 min read Published

Campaigns keep buying TV while 26% of adults credit influencers with swaying their vote

Morning Consult found 26% of US adults say influencer content has affected who they voted for, in a September survey. Business Insider reported that campaigns still spend the bulk of their ad budgets on TV.

The Board Room · Leadership desk

Send a correction

More say creators shifted their views than their vote Shares of US adults in a September Morning Consult survey who say creator content affected their issue views, or who they voted for.

56% of US adults told Morning Consult that creator content affected their views on political or social issues to some degree; 26% said influencer content affected who they voted for. The September survey covered around 2,000 US adults.

More say creators shifted their views than their vote
FigureValueNoteClaim
Say creator content affected their views on issues56%2
Say influencer content affected who they voted for26%Morning Consult survey, September1
US adults surveyed, around2,000 adults1

What happened

  • Among Gen Z respondents, close to three in four said influencer posts had swayed their views on political or social issues.
  • A Syracuse University survey found YouTube was the top source of political and election news for US adults in September, narrowly ahead of TV, print and X.
  • About one in five Democrats and Republicans told Sounds Profitable that a podcast appearance could make them more likely to back a candidate, against 11% of Independents.
  • Jake Paul joined President Trump at a midterm rally in Ohio, while Hasan Piker has become a campaign ally for Michigan's Abdul El-Sayed.

Why it matters

  • What doesn't add up contradiction Voters' stated influence and campaign spending disagree about where persuasion happens, and nothing in the sources says which one is the better guide to this cycle.
  • What it limits constraint A self-reported 26% limits what a campaign can claim from it: the figure shows stated influence, not a measured effect on ballots or on which creators moved which voters.
  • Who has to decide decision Campaigns now have to decide how much to move from big-name creators to niche ones, a choice that buys targeting at the cost of a channel that is harder to measure.

The 26% is a self-report. Morning Consult surveyed about 2,000 US adults in September and shared the results exclusively with Business Insider [1]. The report does not include the question wording or a party breakdown. In the same survey, 56% said creator content had affected their views on political or social issues to some degree [2]. That is 30 points above the vote figure [13]. Whether either number translates into votes, we do not know yet.

Money has not followed attention. Campaigns still spend the bulk of their ad budgets on TV [14]. Business Insider offered two reasons: campaigns are accustomed to buying TV spots, and influencer marketing is harder to predict and measure as social-media feeds become more personalized and algorithmically driven [15]. Nicole Dunger, a founding partner at People First, did not dispute the difficulty. "It can be very challenging, but you see the results in the end," Dunger said. "It's the same with door knocking. We know door knocking somehow works and has worked for so long, but it's not like we have those direct measurements." [7] In our view the comparison asks campaigns to accept weak measurement on the strength of precedent.

The people vouching most directly for the channel do creator work for campaigns. Dunger's firm works with candidates and advocacy groups on their creator strategies [10]. "It is a real player and a big player in this space now," Dunger said [6]. Parker Butler's firm, Luminary Strategies, works on social strategy with Democratic candidates such as James Talarico [11].

Butler described where that work is heading. Reaching creators with smaller followings than Hasan Piker (about 3 million Twitch followers) or Jake Paul (around 21 million YouTube subscribers) is a focus in 2026, he said, and the goal is to move from "this person has a million followers" to influencers who work in a niche a campaign is trying to reach [9]. "It's worth having different pockets of creators for different purposes," Butler said [8].

The trade-off is between targeting and measurement. Niche creators let a campaign aim at a specific audience, and each one adds to a channel already hard to predict and measure [15]. A campaign that moves money this way takes on that risk. One that stays on TV keeps the format it knows how to buy and may miss audiences that, according to the Morning Consult survey, creators are already influencing [1].

What to watch

  • Whether Morning Consult or Business Insider publishes the question wording and a party breakdown for the 26% figure.
  • Whether ad-spending data for this election cycle show creator budgets growing against TV.
  • Whether campaigns working with smaller, niche creators report any measured result from that outreach.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence40
Adoption45
Hype gap+30
Incentives60
Confidence50
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    About one in four Americans (26%) say influencer content has affected who they've voted for, according to a Morning Consult survey of around 2,000 US adults conducted in September and shared exclusively with Business Insider.

    Reported Supported Source: Morning Consult survey, reported by Business InsiderView cited source
  2. [2]

    A little over half of US adults (56%) told Morning Consult that creator content had affected their views on political or social issues to some degree.

    Reported Supported Source: Morning Consult survey, reported by Business InsiderView cited source
  3. [3]

    Among Gen Z respondents, close to three in four said their views on political or social issues had been swayed by influencer posts.

    Reported Supported Source: Morning Consult survey, reported by Business InsiderView cited source

Get this ledger inside ChatGPT. Ask about any of our stories and the answer brings its figure, each claim’s verdict and the sources. Free, no account.

Add to ChatGPTAdd to Claude

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. businessinsider.com

    1 article · October 16, 2026

    26% of Americans say influencers have swayed their vote. Political campaigns are racing to win them over.

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories