Skip to content

Science1 publisherNot yet confirmed elsewhere3 min readPublished

WWF's Living Planet Report sets bluefin tuna's UK comeback against a 73% average wildlife decline

WWF's Living Planet Report 2026 finds monitored wildlife populations have fallen 73% on average since 1970. The report's case that conservation can work leans on bluefin tuna back in UK waters, credited to quota cuts, size limits and protected spawning grounds.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying WWF's Living Planet Report sets bluefin tuna's UK comeback against a 73% average wildlife decline
Generated illustration

What happened

  • WWF and the Zoological Society of London follow close to 36,000 populations drawn from just under 6,000 species, covering mammals, birds and fish as well as reptiles and amphibians.
  • Bluefin tuna, once the basis of large UK fisheries, had largely disappeared from British waters by the 1960s after overfishing of both the fish and its prey.
  • The report counts wild tigers rising from around 3,200 in 2010 to about 5,700 in 2025.
  • It estimates that in 2023 about $7.3 trillion went into activities that harm nature, against $220bn spent protecting or restoring it.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint Headcount gains such as the tigers' sit on a different scale from the index's average trend, so the report's recoveries cannot be subtracted from its 73% to give a net figure.
  • decision Fisheries managers elsewhere get a package to copy, but the tuna record credits quotas, size limits and spawning protection together and cannot tell them which measure to fund first.
  • cost On WWF's estimate, protection receives about 3 cents for every dollar flowing into harm, and the charity says conservation alone cannot reverse the decline.

The 73% averages the change in size of each tracked population. It is not a count of animals lost [3]. About half of the populations are stable or growing, and losses elsewhere outweigh their gains [4]. That second fact tells you something about how the average is built. No population can shrink by more than 100%. So if half sit at zero or above, a plain mean of their percentage changes could not show a fall much larger than 50% [20]. A 73% fall [1] has to come from combining or weighting the series some other way [20].

The index also covers only vertebrates. Dr Katie Collins, a senior curator at the Natural History Museum in London, said it misses plants, insects and other creatures that vertebrates depend on [5]. "If you lose garden snails, you lose the song thrush," she said [6].

The tuna is the report's clearest case, because the remedy matches the diagnosis. The collapse was blamed on overfishing [8]. The report credits the recovery to limits on fishing: lower catch quotas, size limits and protected spawning grounds, backed by campaigns from consumers, chefs and retailers [9]. Those measures act on the tuna itself, but the original decline also involved overfishing of the smaller fish it eats [8]. As reported, the evidence is a before-and-after record of one species [7][8]. The BBC's account of the report does not include a population figure for the fish. The scale of the rebound rests on descriptions: "huge numbers" off the British coast [7], and what Hannah Rudd, head of marine at the Angling Trust, called close to an "explosion" [10].

In my view the case supports Rudd's reading [11]. "I think bluefin tuna is a golden case study that fisheries management works," she said [11]. The measures target the stated cause, and the return followed them [8][9]. A single before-and-after case can show that much. A count would show how large the effect is.

The report's other recoveries took decades, or new law [13][14]. The green sea turtle moved from "endangered" to "least concern" last year after 50 years of conservation work in about 80 countries [13]. Elephants are stable or growing in parts of southern Africa, helped by laws that give local people a share of the income the animals bring, including from tourism [14]. The tiger counts imply a rise of about 78% over 15 years [21].

Mike Barrett, chief scientific adviser at WWF-UK, has worked on seven Living Planet reports and said this is the first whose takeaway is hope [16]. "Hope is not the same thing as wishful thinking," he said. "Hope is not passive. Hope's about action." [15]

WWF names farming and the burning of fossil fuels as the biggest pressures on wildlife [17]. Neither is among the levers credited with the tuna's return [9][17]. "So it's a closing window of opportunity, but it's still open, just, if we act now," Barrett said [19].

What to watch

  • A published UK bluefin population estimate and survey method would put a size on a recovery so far described in words.
  • The full report's methods should show how the nearly 36,000 population series are weighted and combined into the 73% average.
  • Evidence on whether the smaller fish that bluefin eat have recovered too would test how much of the return the fishing limits explain.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories