Product1 distinct publisher3 min readPublished
The ONS widened what counts as digital infrastructure to include data centres, hardware and spectrum. The bigger total went backwards in its first year.
The Product Desk · Product desk

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
The distance between the two measures is £7.6bn [1], and none of it is a building site. The statisticians say so themselves: they are not identifying investment outside existing capital formation data, and the wider definition reclassifies a greater share of what was already recorded [5]. That is still worth doing, because the old method hunted for structures inside the telecoms industry, and a data centre files its shell under buildings, its servers under hardware and its models under software [13]. Nothing in the telecoms line was ever going to find it.
What the wider frame buys is composition. The buildings and structures category, which holds shells alongside fibre and base stations, is 83.8% up on the start of the 2020 pandemic [10]. Software and databases has risen almost 95% since 2021 [11]. After those two, roughly £1.8bn is left for everything else, hardware included [3]. And the longer arc is genuinely steep: by 2023 the total stood 51% above 2019 against 19% for UK business investment as a whole [8], which is close to three times the growth rate of the rest of the capital stock [8].
Then 2025. On the same basis 2024 was about £11.7bn [2], and the release does not say which category gave up the difference. The lines it does describe went up: hardware by 54.6% to its highest since 2006, which the ONS puts down to data centres expanding for cloud and AI [12]. It also notes 2025 was the third highest year in a series running back to 1997, while the direction was down, a point Tom Krazit made for The Stack [7].
The demand side is not in doubt. AI use among UK firms with ten or more employees went from about 12% in late 2023 to 35% this year on the ONS survey [17], on top of the 69% already running cloud systems in 2023 [18]. Oxford Economics counted more than 400% growth in the number of UK data centres between 2000 and 2024, as Tom Rees reported for Bloomberg [19]. Around 63% of last year's development activity was hyperscale, built and operated by global technology firms for their own use [16], so the spending does not arrive through an operator Ofcom supervises. For scale, Ofcom put fixed-network spending by telecoms operators at £6.8bn in 2024, with 77% going into full fibre [23]; the narrow ONS measure is a little over half that, on a different year and a different definition [9].
What binds is power, not capital. Data centres were designated Critical National Infrastructure in 2024, filed with energy and water [15], and both are where the queue forms. Andrew Bailey has warned that AI may have to be rationed if energy capacity runs short, in comments Bloomberg reported [25]; an Essex data centre has already waited on a grid connection and the water industry has warned about supply [26]. Meanwhile the state's own build slipped: £2bn of the £5bn Project Gigabit programme went out between 2020 and 2025, and the 2025 spending review moved nationwide gigabit coverage from 2030 to 2032 [24], leaving 60% of the money and two more years to spend it in [6].
The definition widened on Monday [4]. Next year's release is the first where a fall cannot be charged to bookkeeping.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
Britain's businesses invested £11.2bn in digital infrastructure in 2025, roughly three times what the official measure had been reporting.
The ONS headline measure counts investment in telecommunications structures; on that basis digital infrastructure investment in 2025 was £3.6bn.
The expanded ONS measure adds data centre buildings, hardware, network software and radio spectrum permits, producing £11.2bn.
The Office for National Statistics changed what counts as digital infrastructure on Monday.
A data centre's shell sits under buildings, its servers under hardware and its models under software and databases; the old method looked at structures in the telecoms industry and found none of that, while the new one extends into data processing and hosting.
The ONS considered including publishing and broadcasting in the expanded definition and left them out, on the basis that they make content rather than the infrastructure that moves it.
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Detailed official figures, one publisher, developmental statistics
The numbers are granular, internally consistent and attributed to an ONS release, with corroborating third-party figures (Ofcom, Barbour ABI, Oxford Economics via Bloomberg). Two things cap the score: the cluster has a single publisher with no independent reading of the methodology, and the ONS itself labels the release official statistics in development, advises caution and says it should not be used for policy or decision-making. Key exclusions (data, cooling, power distribution, racks, real-estate-owned facilities) are acknowledged but unsized.
Real buildout and usage, but the reclassified total went backwards
Adoption of the underlying capacity and of AI/cloud is well evidenced: AI use among larger UK firms tripled to 35%, about 69% already used cloud in 2023, data centre count is up more than 400% since 2000, 171 projects are in the pipeline, hyperscale is around 63% of development activity, and hardware investment hit its highest since 2006. What tempers the score is that the newly defined aggregate fell 4.0% in 2025 and the delivery record on the state's own broadband programme slipped by two years, so measured spend is not accelerating in step with the pipeline narrative.
Headline size is definitional; the direction is down
The gap sits in the framing that most readers will take away rather than in this article, which is itself deflationary. A number that 'tripled' did so because roughly £7.6bn of already-recorded capital was reclassified, the ONS says explicitly that no new investment was identified, the wider total fell 4.0%, and the release is not official statistics. Set against that, promotional expectations of £10bn a year by 2029 — about 5.7 times the stated current level — come from unnamed industry figures, while power, grid and water constraints and a two-year broadband slip point the other way. Positive but moderate, because the underlying buildout and AI adoption are genuine.
Definitional stakes for state and industry promoters
Several parties benefit from a larger digital infrastructure number: the government designated data centres as Critical National Infrastructure and is scaling grant funding (£0.7bn in 2024, up 3.5x on 2023) while its gigabit programme has slipped, and industry figures circulating a £10bn-by-2029 expectation from a £1.75bn base are promoting the sector they operate in. Scored mid-range because the ONS attaches an unusually explicit caution to its own release and the coverage foregrounds the reclassification, which cuts against a purely promotional reading; no direct commercial relationship between publisher and the parties is evidenced.
Figures traceable, interpretation unreplicated
Confidence in the arithmetic and the direction of travel is reasonably high: the published totals, category splits and percentage changes are consistent with each other, and the derived figures follow directly. Confidence in durability and in the wider narrative is lower — a single publisher, a measure the ONS calls developmental and expects to revise pending OECD consensus, unsized exclusions, and a forward projection from unnamed sources with a scope mismatch against the ONS categories.
product
Nebius funds $4.5bn of AI capacity on terms that pay lenders mostly in stock2 distinct publishers
invest
The bond selloff the Fed cannot fix: $90 Brent, sovereign supply, AI capex1 distinct publisher
build
The $559M-versus-$12.3B quarter matters more than the $65B run rate4 distinct publishers
invest
Central banks concede the CBDC answer, and the stablecoin fight moves to issuers1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 25, 2026