Invest1 distinct publisher2 min readUpdated
An 80-year-old air-conditioning maker is the S&P 500's third-best performer since early 2021, trailing Nvidia by 4.4 percentage points a year.
The Investor · Invest desk

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
The mechanism is physical and unglamorous. Putting Nvidia GPUs and similarly dense gear into a room requires cooling of a kind data centers did not previously need, and Vertiv's direct-to-chip liquid systems are doing more of that work than any competing approach, according to Fortune [5]. That is a supplier position rather than a technology bet. The customer's design decision creates the requirement, and the requirement has to be bought from someone.
Compound the two annualized figures out over the same six-and-a-half-year window and the distance between the accelerator and the air conditioner is narrower than the framing suggests: Nvidia becomes roughly 17x, Vertiv roughly 14x, so the chipmaker returned about 1.2 times what its customers' cooling vendor did [11]. An allocator who never formed a view on which accelerator would win, and bought the thing every accelerator needs instead, kept most of the compounding without needing to be right about silicon.
The two headline numbers do not quite reconcile, and it is worth saying so. The market-cap move implies about 42% a year compounded, some eight points below the annualized return quoted beside it [12]. Gaps of that shape usually come out of share count, dividends, or a start date that does not sit exactly where the market-cap base does, and the word "under" in "under $11 billion" is carrying weight [2]. The direction is not in question. The precision is looser than a figure quoted to one decimal place implies.
What is transferable here is the filter rather than the outcome. Cote told Fortune he held weekly calls with a Goldman Sachs group and that they looked at more than 1,000 companies before the bank surfaced Vertiv [8]. His criteria predate any interest in AI: a dominant or potentially dominant position, an industry already profitable or on its way there, room to grow internally and by acquisition, scope for wider margins, and the chance to lead a new technology in the sector [9]. He had already run that screen through more than 100 acquisitions at Honeywell [7]. "It was not like I was an AI savant," he says, "but I knew that if I positioned myself in the middle of the data industry there was a good chance something good would happen" [10].
Fortune's read is that Cote noticed a large trend and made himself indispensable to it rather than chasing a hot technology [14]. The screen that found an air-conditioning company in 2019 is now published, and the supply of dominant-position industrials sitting next to a data center is finite.
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
David Cote, who had retired after running Honeywell, was looking for a new project in 2019 and brokered an arrangement with Goldman Sachs under which the bank would present acquisition candidates and raise funding once he picked one it also favored.
Cote: "I had weekly phone calls with the Goldman group, and we looked at over 1,000 companies, and it was Goldman that found them."
Vertiv is an 80-year-old maker of industrial air conditioning.
Since Vertiv went public in early 2021, its market cap has risen almost 10x, from under $11 billion to $109 billion.
Over that six-and-a-half-year span, Vertiv's annualized return of 50.5% ranks third in the S&P 500.
The only S&P 500 companies ahead of Vertiv on that measure are Comfort Systems at 55.2% and Nvidia at 54.9%.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Precise market figures, one publisher, unquantified core mechanism
The financial claims are specific and independently checkable in principle (market cap from under $11B to $109B, 50.5% annualized return, third in the S&P 500 behind 55.2% and 54.9%), which lifts the floor. But the entire cluster is one Fortune article; the mechanism that carries the thesis - Vertiv's direct-to-chip liquid cooling leading the market - has no share, revenue, customer, or benchmark support, and the operating history rests on the protagonist's own recollection with no counterparty comment. Arithmetic on the article's own numbers also surfaces an unreconciled gap between implied market-cap growth and quoted shareholder return.
No deployment, order, or usage data supplied
Nothing in the supplied material measures adoption of Vertiv's cooling technology: no named data-center customers, no unit or megawatt deployments, no order book, backlog, revenue mix, or share figures. Share-price and market-cap appreciation are market pricing, not adoption evidence, and inferring deployment scale from them would be a guess. Returning insufficient rather than reading adoption out of the 'more than any other solution' assertion.
Verified stock story, unverified 'indispensable' claim
Positive: the framing runs ahead of the evidence. The measurable part - the ten-bagger and the S&P 500 ranking - is well specified, but the interpretation layered on it (that Vertiv's liquid cooling more than any other solution is what makes AI deployment happen, and that Cote 'quietly became indispensable' to the trend) is asserted with zero supporting data, and no valuation, competitive, or downside consideration is offered for a stock up roughly tenfold. The gap is moderate rather than extreme because the headline numbers themselves are concrete and attributed.
CEO-access profile with self-narrated success story
Observable in the source: the article is an access-based profile built on Cote's own quotes about his search, his criteria, and his outcome, with no comment from Goldman Sachs, Emerson, or Platinum Equity; the author also cites his own 2012 Fortune profile of Cote, indicating a long-standing subject relationship. Cote has an evident interest in presenting the Vertiv outcome as repeatable judgment rather than fortunate positioning. No sponsorship, holdings, or undisclosed financial relationship is stated in the material, so the score reflects only visible narrative alignment, not inferred conflicts.
Moderate on the numbers, low on the thesis
Confidence is bounded by single-publisher sourcing and an unmeasurable adoption dimension. The market-performance facts are reported with enough specificity to be relied on provisionally, and the perspective read is high-confidence because the one source is fully in hand. The causal thesis about cooling market leadership, and therefore the story's investment implication, cannot be assessed from what was supplied.
invest
The AI trade's real risk showed up in July, and it was not the drawdown1 distinct publisher
product
Nebius funds $4.5bn of AI capacity on terms that pay lenders mostly in stock2 distinct publishers
build
SMIC's first $3 billion quarter comes with a wafer price increase attached1 distinct publisher
build
The chokepoint moved: ABF film, not lithography, now caps China's accelerator output1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 22, 2026