Skip to content

InvestNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished

Tesla Korea pledges under oath to seek FSD approval for the 79% of Korean Teslas barred from running it

Tesla Korea CEO Seo Yeong-deuk pledged under oath to seek FSD certification in a country where only 20.7% of 229,311 registered Teslas can legally run it. The testimony feeds a lawsuit owners have pressed since December 2024 over an option they paid about 9 million won for and say they could never use.

The Investor · Invest desk

How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Tesla Korea pledges under oath to seek FSD approval for the 79% of Korean Teslas barred from running it
Photo: koreatimes.co.kr

What happened

  • Transport ministry officials told the audit that no separate road-safety testing of FSD has been conducted under the Korea-US trade deal's provisions.
  • The ministry has concluded that both versions deployed in Korea, Supervised FSD and FSD V14 Lite, do not meet domestic safety standards as certified.
  • China-built Teslas need independent Korean certification before FSD can be enabled, because the Korea-China trade agreement has no matching safety-recognition clause.
  • Under questioning from Democratic Party lawmaker Jang Jong-tae, Seo acknowledged Tesla Korea had never requested testing from the ministry or the Korea Environment Corporation.

Why it matters

  • contradiction Korean law lets the 47,458 treaty-covered cars run FSD builds the ministry has judged non-compliant, so the regulator's verdict and the cars' legal status point in opposite directions.
  • exposure If a court finds the feature was never deliverable, Tesla's refund exposure runs to about 9 billion won for every thousand Korean buyers of the option.
  • decision Tesla now has to choose which FSD build to put up for Korean certification, knowing both builds on the road have already been judged short of the standard.

The Korea-US Free Trade Agreement is the reason the ministry never road-tested FSD, according to Tech Times [10]. Under the treaty, a US-built car certified to American federal safety standards is deemed to meet Korea's own standards without domestic testing. The manufacturer's assertion of compliance is enough [10]. The clause let Model S, Model X and Cybertruck owners switch FSD on without a Korean government sign-off [11].

That split leaves 181,853 registered Teslas unable to run the feature, against 47,458 that can [17]. The locked-out cars are overwhelmingly Shanghai-built Model 3 and Model Y [7]. Those two models make up more than 90 percent of Tesla's Korean sales [13]. New sales run above 90 percent China-built while the registered fleet is 79.3 percent locked out, so each further year without certification pushes the locked-out share higher [19].

Tech Times describes Tesla Korea as passive on certification while selling a feature it could not legally deploy on the country's most popular Tesla models [15]. Every option sold on a Shanghai car added to the owners' eventual claim [9] and nothing to a certification file [14].

The pledge can go three ways. Certification could arrive for the Shanghai cars, and the owners' claim would narrow to the years they waited. It could stall or fail, and the ministry's existing verdict on the two deployed builds [5] would become the plaintiffs' strongest exhibit. Or the ministry could apply that verdict to the treaty cars and cut into the 47,458 that work today [6]. I think the second is likeliest in the near term. FSD runs on cameras alone and trains on a global dataset. Tech Times reports that this dataset only partly includes Korean road data because Korea restricts the export of high-precision map data on security grounds [16]. The counter-case is that Tesla self-certifies FSD as Level 2 [2], below the Level 3 threshold at which Korea requires pre-approval [3], so the test Tesla faces may be narrower than the ministry's verdict suggests. A pass for either current build on a Shanghai-built car would prove this view wrong.

What to watch

  • Whether the transport ministry moves to restrict FSD on the 47,458 treaty-covered cars running builds it has judged non-compliant.
  • A ruling in the owners' civil lawsuit, and whether the court treats the ministry's audit testimony as evidence the feature was undeliverable.
  • Tesla Korea's first formal certification filing, and whether FSD is reviewed as Level 2 or drawn into Korea's Level 3 pre-approval process.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption20
Hype gap+25
Incentives60
Confidence50
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Tesla Korea CEO Seo Yeong-deuk, placed under oath at a two-day National Assembly audit, committed that the company would formally seek government certification for Full Self-Driving, a commitment it had never made publicly before.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Tech Times, citing National Assembly audit proceedings2 sources— create a free account to open themView cited source
  2. [2]

    Tesla has self-certified FSD as Level 2.

  3. [3]

    Korea would require a Level 3 pre-approval at the conditional automation threshold.

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. techtimes.com

    1 article · October 9, 2026

    Korea Audit: Tesla CEO Vows FSD Certification as Ministry Confirms Zero Road Testing

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Entities

Loading related stories