Teacher burnout programmes succeed as whole-school efforts staff help design, a 25-year review suggests
Luke Tomlin's team reviewed 247 sources from 42 countries and found mindfulness-based programmes among the most consistently positive for teacher well-being. School leaders now know which formats have the longest track record and how to deliver them, but the release does not report how large the benefits were.
The Scientist · Science desk

What happened
- Combined mindfulness and social-emotional learning programmes and multicomponent positive psychology interventions joined mindfulness-based approaches as the most frequent and most consistently positive.
- The findings suggest successful programmes build teachers' skills, strengthen their relationships, improve working conditions and involve staff in design and delivery across the whole school.
- The paper, led by Luke Tomlin, a PhD candidate at the University of Western Australia and The Kids Research Institute Australia, appears in Teaching and Teacher Education.
Why it matters
- decision A school picking a well-being programme has literature-wide support for mindfulness-based or combined mindfulness and social-emotional formats over less-studied options.
- cost Because the review ties success to changing working conditions as well as training teachers, part of the bill falls on staffing and scheduling budgets, beyond the price of a course.
- constraint With the same approaches ranking as both most studied and most consistent, a budget holder cannot tell from this review whether consistency reflects a strong effect or simply a large volume of research.
The same three approaches head both of the review's lists. Combined mindfulness and social-emotional learning programmes, mindfulness-based approaches and multicomponent positive psychology interventions were the most frequently identified. They were also the most consistently associated with positive effects [1]. Those two findings are hard to pull apart. A format that has been tested many times has more chances to post a positive result, so consistency here partly tracks how much research attention a format has had.
The paper is a scoping review [9], and the study was framed around burnout and turnover [6]. According to the release, the authors catalogued four things across 247 sources: the types of intervention in use, the outcomes researchers chose to measure, the effects they reported and the factors that shaped implementation [8]. The thing this doesn't tell you is how many of those sources tested each approach, what the programmes were compared against, or whether any of them tracked teachers actually leaving the profession.
The programmes and the problems teachers describe do not line up neatly. "These interventions typically aimed to strengthen self-regulation and mindfulness skills, enhance teacher self-efficacy and cultivate positive relationships to promote well-being and resilience," Tomlin said [2]. The pressures he listed are of another kind. "Teachers are juggling heavy workloads, administrative tasks, challenging student behavior, demanding parents and the emotional pressures of the profession, often with limited support," he said [11]. Mindfulness training works on how a teacher copes with that load. Tomlin's own figures are about the load itself. Citing a recent Australian study, he said "90% of teachers reported severe stress, while nearly 70% said their workload was unmanageable" [10].
The whole-school finding addresses that mismatch head-on, because it puts working conditions next to skills training and gives staff a hand in the design [3]. "Teacher well-being is a shared responsibility that requires building teachers' individual capabilities, strengthening relationships and support, and creating working conditions that help them thrive," Tomlin said [4].
For a school leader with a fixed budget, I think the evidence supports a narrow decision. If the school is going to fund a well-being programme, the mindfulness-based and combined formats are the most studied and the most consistently positive in this literature [1]. On the review's implementation findings, they belong inside a plan that also changes working conditions [3]. Tomlin ended on the same point. "Better working conditions for teachers also mean better learning conditions for students," he said [5].
What to watch
- The full paper's tables showing how many of the 247 sources tested each approach and what comparison groups they used.
- Trials of whole-school, staff-designed programmes that measure teacher turnover directly, beyond self-reported well-being.
- Whether education departments pair funded mindfulness programmes with measured workload reductions, the combination the review's implementation findings favour.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence45
- Adoption
- Insufficient
- Hype gap+20
- Incentives
- Insufficient
- Confidence55
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
The most frequently identified approaches, and those most consistently associated with positive effects, were combined mindfulness and social-emotional learning interventions, mindfulness-based approaches and multicomponent positive psychology interventions.
- [2]
"These interventions typically aimed to strengthen self-regulation and mindfulness skills, enhance teacher self-efficacy and cultivate positive relationships to promote well-being and resilience," Tomlin said.
- [3]
The findings suggest successful implementation involves a whole-school approach combining efforts to build teachers' capabilities, strengthen their connections with others and create working conditions that support well-being, while actively involving staff in the design and delivery of well-being initiatives.
- [4]
"Teacher well-being is a shared responsibility that requires building teachers' individual capabilities, strengthening relationships and support, and creating working conditions that help them thrive," Tomlin said.
- [5]
"Better working conditions for teachers also mean better learning conditions for students."
- [6]
The study examined how positive psychology interventions could help reduce teacher burnout and turnover, retain knowledge and experience in schools and create better learning environments for students.
- [7]
Ph.D. candidate Luke Tomlin, from the School of Human Sciences at The University of Western Australia and The Kids Research Institute Australia, was lead author of the study published in Teaching and Teacher Education.
- [8]
Researchers reviewed 247 sources spanning 25 years of research across 42 countries, examining the types of interventions used, outcomes measured, reported effects and factors that may influence implementation and effectiveness.
- [9]
The paper is titled 'Positive psychology interventions to promote resilience and wellbeing among educators: A scoping review', Teaching and Teacher Education (2026).
- [10]
"a recent Australian study found that 90% of teachers reported severe stress, while nearly 70% said their workload was unmanageable," Tomlin said.
- [11]
"Teachers are juggling heavy workloads, administrative tasks, challenging student behavior, demanding parents and the emotional pressures of the profession, often with limited support."
Sources
1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.
- phys.orgStudy aims to reduce teacher burnout and turnover
1 article · October 8, 2026
Topics and entities
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Entities
- Luke TomlinFollow
- Teaching and Teacher EducationFollow
- University of Western AustraliaFollow
- The Kids Research Institute AustraliaFollow