Skip to content

Science1 publisherNot yet confirmed elsewhere2 min readPublished

Zurich-led team builds a global DNA atlas of microscopic life in 362 lakes

Zurich-led researchers reconstructed nearly 20,000 mitochondrial genomes from 362 lakes to build the first global DNA atlas of microscopic lake life. It gives genetic water monitoring a missing reference library, though the report describes no test of whether it can flag toxic algae.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying Zurich-led team builds a global DNA atlas of microscopic life in 362 lakes
Generated illustration

What happened

  • The genomes came from 3,400 DNA data sets drawn from lakes and reservoirs in 28 countries on every continent.
  • In several groups of algae and their relatives, the atlas lists six to more than 20 times as many species as the world's leading reference genomic database.
  • Fewer than one genome in 20 could be assigned to a known genus, and about 750 species matched no known group at all.
  • Lake microeukaryotes are still counted one by one under a microscope with a 1958 method that is slow and depends on increasingly scarce expertise.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • capability A fixed species rule lets labs check new samples against one shared reference, so results from different lakes, seasons and studies can be compared directly.
  • constraint With more than 95% of genomes lacking a known genus, a DNA match will usually identify a genetic cluster without saying what the organism is or whether it makes toxins.
  • exposure Until sequence data can separate toxic strains from look-alikes, bloom warnings for drinking-water reservoirs rest on microscope work that cannot make that call either.

Conventional DNA surveys of water use a molecular bait that catches only the groups it was built for, so other organisms slip through [9]. This team dropped the bait. Lake water is filtered, everything caught on the filter is sequenced at once, and a machine-learning tool picks out the mitochondrial DNA [9][10]. Choosing mitochondria is the clever part of the design. Their genomes are small, so they can be reconstructed from a mixed sample. They also generally change faster over evolutionary time than nuclear DNA, so even close relatives carry clearly different versions [10].

Species in the atlas are defined by a cut-off: two mitochondrial genomes at least 98.1% identical count as one species [12]. The rule keeps identifications consistent across lakes, seasons and studies [12]. It also means the roughly 3,660 species, and the six- to 20-fold excess over the leading reference database, are counts of genetic clusters drawn with that line, and they would shift if the line moved [6][7][12].

Of those 3,660 species, about 750 matched no known group, close to one in five [16]. "This shows just how large the gaps in our knowledge still are," lead author Lucas Serra Moncadas said, according to phys.org [11].

For water managers the useful question is toxicity. "Under the microscope, a harmless alga and its toxic relative can look identical," said Adrian-Stefan Andrei, who heads the Microbial Evogenomics group at the University of Zurich's Limnological Station and was the study's principal investigator [3][15]. "Their DNA likely holds the key to telling them apart." The word "likely" is accurate. The report does not describe a test showing that a toxic strain and its harmless look-alike fall on opposite sides of the 98.1% line [12].

The Oder River shows what a missed bloom costs. In 2022 a toxic microalga bloomed there, on the German-Polish border, and killed around 360 tonnes of fish [13]. The researchers say DNA-based monitoring could allow faster responses to overheated or polluted water and catch cases like the Oder's early [18]. "For more than 60 years, we have seen only a fraction of the life in the lakes and reservoirs that provide drinking water to more than 180 million Europeans," Andrei said [19]. "Soon, a single bottle of lake water could reveal who lives in it, what's new and what's changing."

I think the atlas succeeds at its first task: supplying the genetic reference data that, until now, was largely missing [14]. Retiring the 1958 microscope count would take a second study [2]. It would need the same samples counted by eye, read by sequence and tested for toxins, with the agreement between methods reported.

What to watch

  • A side-by-side trial that runs microscope counts, sequencing and toxin tests on the same reservoir samples and reports how often the methods agree.
  • Whether a known toxin-producing alga and its harmless relative fall into separate species at the 98.1% mitochondrial threshold.
  • How many of the roughly 750 unmatched species get assigned to known groups as the atlas's DNA pool grows.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories