Skip to content

BuildNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished

Ukraine's parliament takes a third run at the panel that runs Accounting Chamber hiring

Ukraine's Rada will try a third time to form the Accounting Chamber's hiring panel, with over half its posts vacant for almost two years. The vote ties into commitments to partners whose financial aid depends on them, Mezha reported, citing Ukrainska Pravda.

The Engineer · Build desk

How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Ukraine's parliament takes a third run at the panel that runs Accounting Chamber hiring
Photo: kyivindependent.com
Three Ukrainian candidates won't make the panel Candidates and seats on the Rada's advisory group of experts, which is to run the competition for Accounting Chamber member posts.

Key figures: 6 Ukrainian candidates are on the list for 3 Ukrainian seats the Rada must fill on the expert group. The group must also include 3 international experts.

Three Ukrainian candidates won't make the panel
FigureValueNoteClaim
Ukrainian candidates on the list6 candidates13
Ukrainian seats to fill3 seats6
International experts, required3 experts6

What happened

  • The competition was announced after the December 2024 reform law, but since June 2025 parliament has been unable to vote the expert group into existence.
  • Compared with the previous submission, the Ukrainian list adds five names: Vyshlynskyi, Zhupanyn, Kamenska, Marchenko and Pashuk.
  • Masliak is the only candidate carried over, and she missed the required vote count in both earlier rating votes.
  • The Rada has to choose three Ukrainians from the list, and the group will also include three international experts.

Why it matters

  • constraint Choosing the experts is the step meant to unblock the competition, so a third failed vote leaves the hiring process stuck at its first stage.
  • decision Deputies pick three of six Ukrainian names, so three candidates are out whichever way the vote goes.
  • exposure Two of the six, Zhupanyn and Kamenska, are named by the article's author as raising questions on the reputation test, so any vote for either will be read against that clause.
  • contradiction The Kamenska allegations are unconfirmed by the journalists themselves, yet the ethics commission faulted the reporting and also left open that the land was undervalued.

The statute's test has one clause that can be checked and several that cannot. Five years in audit, economics, finance or law is a line on a CV [7]. Impeccable business reputation, high professional and moral qualities and public authority are judgments [7]. In our view that is where a vote on any single name can go either way. The article's author questions whether some candidates meet the requirements [8].

Two cases get detail. Bihus.info reported in 2024 that Zhupanyn travelled abroad regularly during the full-scale war to study at London Business School and to holiday there with his wife, including during plenary sittings and votes [9]. Deputies may leave the country only for work reasons [18]. Zhupanyn explained the trips as work for the Ukraine-UK friendship group or as leave, and the journalists found no confirmation of working meetings in that period [9].

That same year NAZK finished a full check of his 2023 declaration and doubted his explanation for his wife's cash holdings: 1.5 million hryvnias, 182,000 dollars, 195,000 euros and 130,000 pounds sterling [10]. She said it was savings from her father's business [10]. NAZK recorded inaccuracies in the declaration but, citing the small amount involved, found no signs of an offence [10].

Kamenska's file dates from 2021. A media investigation that July examined her assets and her influence over auditor self-governance [15]. Its author argued that, while heading both the Auditors Chamber of Ukraine and the auditor certification commission, she could have used a jump in certificates issued to win support for her re-election as chamber head [15]. The article notes that the journalists gave no clear confirmation of those suspicions [15].

The same investigation covered a house and plot in Bobrytsia, near Kyiv. Its author said the house cost 702,000 hryvnias against a market value that allegedly exceeded 8 million [16]. Instead of suing to refute the allegations, Kamenska complained to the Commission on Journalistic Ethics [16]. The commission did not rule out that the plot's value was understated and found breaches of several journalistic standards, including balance of opinion and separation of fact from judgment [16].

Parliament's own staff make up a large part of the list. Marchenko is first deputy head of the Servant of the People faction secretariat, and Pashuk and Masliak are each assistant-consultants to an MP [11]. That is three of the six Ukrainian candidates [14][13]. Zhupanyn, a fourth, is a former MP [4].

What to watch

  • The date of the third vote, which the report puts only in the near future, and whether Masliak clears the threshold against the five new names.
  • Whether the Rada picks Zhupanyn or Kamenska, the two whose backgrounds the article questions.
  • Whether the three international experts are named and the group is formed, since the competition cannot open before that.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence50
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap
Insufficient
Incentives55
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    The Accounting Chamber has worked for almost two years with more than half of its posts vacant.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Mezha, citing Ukrainska PravdaView cited source
  2. [2]

    In the near future the Verkhovna Rada will try for a third time to vote to create an advisory group of experts (DGE) that will run the competition for Accounting Chamber member posts.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Mezha, citing Ukrainska PravdaView cited source
  3. [3]

    The competition was announced after a new law on Accounting Chamber reform was adopted in December 2024, but since June 2025 parliament has been unable to vote to create the DGE.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Mezha, citing Ukrainska PravdaView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. mezha.net

    1 article · October 12, 2026

    Рахункова палата: Рада втретє спробує сформувати експертну групу для конкурсу

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

  • Ukrainian parliament politicsFollow
  • Ukraine public audit reformFollow

Entities

Loading related stories