Invest1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
The world's largest geothermal operator wants to sell AI data centers power anywhere. Its two pilots sit at plants it already owns, and revenue is growing ten times faster than profit.
The Investor · Invest desk

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made
Blue Mountain and Desert Peak, the two sites Ormat picked for its enhanced geothermal pilots, are plants it already operates in Nevada, a state Fortune describes as a hotspot for geothermal energy [7]. That is the friendliest rock on the table, and the least demanding test of the proposition the whole pitch rests on: generation almost anywhere a customer asks for it, reached with oilfield drilling and fracking [3]. The nearest thing to an "anywhere" result belongs to the startup partner rather than to Ormat. Sage Geosystems brought its own first pilot online in August near San Antonio, as a precursor to the joint project [8].
The location case is still a case. The income statement is not, and it repays a second look. First-half 2026 revenue of $662.7 million was up 43 percent year on year; net profit of $71.2 million was up 4 percent [12]. Run those rates backwards and the year-earlier half was roughly $463 million of revenue on roughly $68.5 million of net income [17]. So about $199 million of additional revenue carried about $2.7 million of additional profit, an incremental net margin near 1.4 percent [18], and the overall net margin fell from about 14.8 percent to about 10.7 percent [19]. CEO Doron Blachar's point that Ormat is profitable outside the pilots holds [13]. The arithmetic adds that the revenue arriving now earns far less per dollar than the revenue already there, and Fortune's account does not say which businesses did the diluting.
That is the pressure behind the comparison Ormat itself invites. Fortune reports the science of enhanced geothermal as proven, with the open question being whether the plants can be built economically and efficiently enough to contend with gas-fired power, renewables and nuclear [4]. Competing on cost means earning back a drilling program at a price a hyperscaler will sign, which is what a pilot is for: finding the number.
The public comparable shows what the market pays for the story without the cash flow. Fervo went public in May in the largest US clean energy IPO, reached a $10 billion market cap, then fell to about $5 billion after what Fortune terms modest setbacks [15]. Ormat is up almost 20 percent over twelve months at about $6.75 billion [14], roughly 1.35 times Fervo [20], after half of Fervo's peak value disappeared [21]. Blachar's own framing matches that gap. He told Fortune that even if the enhanced geothermal push fails, Ormat will be successful, on traditional geothermal plus a battery storage business growing with solar [9]. Read plainly, that is the option priced correctly: for Ormat, drilling deeper is upside bolted to an operating business; for a pure play, it is the business.
What a buyer of firm capacity would most want verified is the thinnest part of the record. Blachar says Ormat holds contracts with hyperscalers and utilities for hundreds of megawatts and knows how to get permits and interconnections [10], and the company is working closely with Google and the data center developer Switch [6]. Fortune's account attaches no contract values, prices or delivery dates to any of it [25]. Until it does, his "endless demand" [22] describes appetite, not booked revenue.
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
Ormat aims to grow with the AI data center boom by building baseload clean power plants throughout the Western United States using enhanced geothermal systems (EGS).
Ormat is launching two separate EGS pilot projects with different partners: geothermal startup Sage Geosystems, and SLB, the century-old largest oilfield services firm in the world.
Both EGS pilots are in Nevada, described as a hotspot for geothermal energy: the Sage pilot at Ormat's Blue Mountain power plant and the SLB pilot at Ormat's Desert Peak plant.
Blachar said that even if the push into EGS fails, Ormat will be successful, citing traditional geothermal growth plus a newer battery energy storage business growing with solar installations nationwide.
Blachar notes Ormat is profitable outside of its pilot projects.
Blachar said: "We're in a very rare situation where all the stars are aligned exactly on time... we see endless demand for our product. The more electricity we can generate, the more we sell."
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
One publisher, company-sourced with hard financials
Everything rests on a single Fortune access interview with Ormat's CEO. The financial and market-cap figures are specific and checkable, and pilot partners and sites are named, but the forward-looking core (anywhere-siting, hyperscaler demand, best-positioned-for-EGS) has no independent corroboration, no counterparty confirmation and no cost data.
Real conventional fleet, zero EGS output
Ormat has a genuinely deployed 1.85 GW conventional geothermal and storage business generating revenue, which anchors adoption well above zero. The EGS layer that the story is about has no deployed capacity: both pilots are pre-drilling at existing Ormat sites with a late-2027 earliest online date, and the only live EGS-adjacent asset cited is Sage's small precursor pilot near San Antonio.
Overstated against pre-drilling pilots and diluting margins
The framing — geothermal anywhere the customer wants, stars aligned, endless demand, 500 MW hyperscaler projects — runs well ahead of what the same article evidences: two undrilled pilots deliberately sited where conventional geothermal already works, revenue growing roughly ten times faster than net profit, and an unpriced contract book. The gap is not fabrication; the conventional business and financial disclosure are real, which keeps this short of the extreme.
CEO promotional interview in a valuation contest
The narrative is supplied by Ormat's CEO while the company is being repriced against Fervo, giving a direct interest in emphasizing hyperscaler demand, downside protection and best-positioned-for-EGS claims. Partner incentives point the same way: SLB is described as pushing to expand into geothermal, and Sage is a startup whose precursor pilot precedes the Ormat project. The publisher's incentive is access-driven narrative rather than adversarial scrutiny.
Facts firm, thesis unverified
Confidence is moderate: the concrete facts (financials, market caps, pilot partners and sites, portfolio megawatts) are stated plainly enough to reason about and the derived margin arithmetic follows directly from them, but with one publisher, one on-record voice and no cost or contract data, the forward-looking core of the story cannot be assessed with any strength.
invest
Ormat's fracked-rock bet has data-center contracts through 2030 and no commercial EGS wells yet1 distinct publisher
product
The dirtiest part of the AI gas buildout is a turbine spec, not a nameplate1 distinct publisher
invest
The data-center backlash is now a permitting variable, not a PR problem1 distinct publisher
invest
ServiceNow paid $7.75bn for Armis and got a re-rating, not just a product line1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 22, 2026