Skip to content

Science1 publisherNot yet confirmed elsewhere2 min readPublished

Grasslands stripped of plant diversity absorb about 15% less CO2 by 2050 in a PIK-Kiel model

Grasslands with strongly reduced plant diversity would take up about 15% less CO2 by 2050, a PIK and Kiel University model in PNAS projects. The comparison pits kept diversity against a deliberately extreme loss, so it measures what the plant mix is worth to carbon uptake under warming.

The Scientist · Science desk

How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying Grasslands stripped of plant diversity absorb about 15% less CO2 by 2050 in a PIK-Kiel model
Generated illustration

What happened

  • With warming held below 2 degrees C, low-diversity grasslands take up about 11 billion tonnes less CO2 a year in 2050, comparable to losing an Arctic tundra's area of average grassland.
  • Many tropical and subtropical grasslands show the widest gaps, taking up as much as 50% less CO2 when diversity is cut, even in the below-2-degree scenario.
  • The team ran a global vegetation model under two climate scenarios, warming below 2 degrees C and around 4 degrees C, comparing maintained against strongly reduced diversity.
  • Where diversity is reduced, the model also projects smaller stocks of carbon held in grassland soils.

Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • constraint Meeting the below-2-degree goal does not on its own protect grassland uptake in this model, so climate targets and the upkeep of plant mixes have to be pursued as separate efforts.
  • exposure Livestock-dependent households are exposed, since Wirth says diversity loss also shrinks forage for grazing animals and can threaten livelihoods built on grazing.
  • decision Farm policy now has a modelled case for paying farmers to keep existing plant mixes; Taube says that support would help grazing livelihoods, particularly in the Global South.

The model's case for diversity is substitution. "Climate change could reduce the productivity of plants that at the moment dominate pastures and meadows. But if plant diversity is maintained, other plants that cope better with climate impacts have the chance to become more prominent and stem the decline," said Stephen Wirth, the PIK researcher who led the study [8]. Local experiments had already shown that plant diversity supports grassland productivity. This study takes that finding to a global vegetation model [7]. The study was not designed to estimate how much diversity real grasslands will actually lose by 2050 [6].

The two global figures can be checked against each other. If the 15% and the 11 billion tonnes describe the same below-2-degree run, diverse grasslands would be taking up roughly 73 billion tonnes of CO2 a year in 2050, since 11 divided by 0.15 is about 73 [14]. That is a flow into plants through photosynthesis [4]. The thing this doesn't tell you is how much of the shortfall would otherwise have ended up stored. Storage would show up in the soil, and the account of the study reports only that soil carbon stocks are lower under reduced diversity [5]. It does not include figures for the 4 degree run [6].

The global average also combines regions that move in opposite directions. "In some regions, remaining plants can compensate for the loss of other plant types, and productivity may even increase. Globally, however, the benefits of maintaining diversity prevail in both climate scenarios," said Susanne Rolinski, a PIK co-author [10]. The authors caution that the model simplifies plant traits and interactions, so the exact magnitude of the effects is uncertain [11].

I think the sign of the result is sturdier than its size. The benefit of diversity holds globally under both warming scenarios [10]. The 15% and the 50% depend on how well a simplified model lets one plant type stand in for another [11].

The authors' recommendation is about grazing. "To maintain grassland productivity under climate change, we need management practices that preserve existing diversity over the long term and prevent overgrazing," said Friedhelm Taube, a Kiel University co-author [12].

What to watch

  • Figures in the full PNAS paper for the 4 degree run and for soil carbon, to see whether the diversity benefit grows with warming and how much carbon it keeps stored.
  • Field measurements from tropical and subtropical grasslands testing whether gaps near 50% appear outside the model.
  • Model runs using realistic, less extreme diversity loss, which would turn this comparison of extremes into a projection.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence45
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+15
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence50
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    The study, from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and Kiel University (CAU), was published in PNAS.

    ReportedSupportedView cited source
  2. [2]

    A substantial loss of plant diversity could mean grasslands worldwide absorb around 15% less CO2 through photosynthesis by midcentury compared with a scenario in which diversity is maintained.

    ReportedSupportedView cited source
  3. [3]

    In many tropical and subtropical regions, grasslands with strongly reduced diversity take up as much as 50% less CO2 in 2050 than those where diversity is maintained, a decline that appears even in the scenario where warming stays below 2C.

    ReportedSupportedView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. phys.org

    1 article · October 8, 2026

    Losing plant diversity could reduce grassland CO₂ absorption 15% by 2050, model projects

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Loading related stories