Skip to content

BuildNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished

Only six of 16 transactions under Rule 159 still accept a declaration from a customer without PAN

Under the Income-tax Rules, 2026, Form 97 replaces Form 60 and is accepted for only six of the 16 transactions that require PAN, a dev.to guide reports. Lenders need a transaction-type check at intake before accepting any declaration in place of a PAN.

The Engineer · Build desk

How we use AISend a correction

High-value cash and property deals now need a PAN Rupee thresholds at which a customer without PAN must apply for one, or may give a declaration instead, as reported by a dev.to guide.

Thresholds. Cash deposits or withdrawals of Rs 10 lakh or more in a year: PAN mandatory. Property: PAN above Rs 45 lakh, declaration above Rs 20 lakh. Declaration accepted above Rs 2 lakh per goods or services deal and above Rs 50,000 a year in insurance premium.

High-value cash and property deals now need a PAN
FigureValueNoteClaim
Cash deposits/withdrawals in a FY10 Rs lakh or morePAN mandatory; no declaration route5
Property: PAN required above45 Rs lakhDeclaration accepted above Rs 20 lakh7
Goods or services, per transaction2 Rs lakhDeclaration accepted above this23
Insurance premium in a year50,000 RsDeclaration accepted above this6

What happened

  • Rule 114B is now Rule 159, the reporting rule 114D is now Rule 160, and the statement of declarations, Form 61, is now Form 98.
  • PAN is mandatory with no declaration route for credit card applications, demat account opening and cash deposits or withdrawals of Rs 10 lakh or more in a financial year.
  • A declaration is still accepted for opening a bank account other than a time deposit, and for insurance premiums above Rs 50,000 in a year.
  • Form 97 asks for more than Form 60 did and runs in six parts, including a masked Aadhaar number and a separate payment-mode code for UPI.
  • Declarations received from April to September are reported in Form 98 by 31 October, and those received from October to March by 30 April of the next financial year.

Why it matters

  • constraint For the other ten transactions the customer must apply for a PAN, so intake for credit cards, demat accounts and high-value cash has to send a no-PAN applicant to that application and stop.
  • cost Taking a Form 97 creates a standing duty to file Form 98 online with the Director of Income-tax (Intelligence and Criminal Investigation) and to keep each declaration for six years from the end of the financial year of the transaction. The guide tells banks to confirm their reporting systems match Form 98.
  • contradiction RBI's KYC Directions, as updated on 18 September 2026, still say "Form No. 60 as defined in Income-tax Rules, 1962", so the guide advises lenders to document how their policy maps that wording to Form 97 until RBI aligns it.
  • decision Customer scripts and SOPs need to say Form 97 with "formerly Form 60" beside it, because the guide expects customers to keep asking for Form 60 instead of PAN.

Everything here rests on one dev.to guide. By its own account it sets out the changes, the RBI requirements that remain in force, and the steps for checking and tracking customers who have no PAN [20]. It cites the Income Tax Department's rule pages and forms FAQ for the renumbering [18]. The excerpt ends mid-sentence in the reporting section, so the guide's own monitoring steps are not part of it.

The property row shows why one threshold per rule is not enough. A declaration is accepted for immovable property above Rs 20 lakh, and above Rs 45 lakh the person must apply for PAN [7]. That leaves a declaration band Rs 25 lakh wide [24]. Khaitan & Co's April 2026 analysis, which the guide cites, notes that the property trigger moved from Rs 10 lakh to Rs 20 lakh and the hotel bill trigger from Rs 50,000 to Rs 1 lakh [19]. A rule table that still carries the old values will misfire in both directions.

Other rows are cumulative. Cash deposits or withdrawals count once they aggregate Rs 10 lakh or more in a financial year [5]. Time deposits are caught above Rs 50,000, or Rs 5 lakh in aggregate in a year [22]. Insurance premiums are caught above Rs 50,000 in a year [6]. The goods and services row works per transaction, at Rs 2 lakh [23]. A running total needs a key to group by, and PAN is the usual one. A customer without it needs another, so we'd expect lenders to run the totals on an internal customer ID.

The form gives intake a place to enforce the six-row list. Its first part is the coded nature of the transaction, and its last is a signed verification acknowledging prosecution for false statements [9]. In our view, the first field is where the check belongs, before a record is created.

Eligibility turns on who the customer is. Rule 159 takes the declaration from "any person, not being a company or a firm" without PAN [15]. The guide lists individuals, HUFs, trusts, associations of persons, local authorities and certain foreign companies [15]. A minor without taxable income quotes a parent's or guardian's PAN instead [16].

What to watch

  • RBI revising its KYC Directions to say Form 97 where they now cite Form No. 60 as defined in the 1962 Rules.
  • The first half-yearly Form 98 filings under Rule 160, and whether bank reporting systems match them.
  • Any guidance from the Income Tax Department or RBI on tracking the cumulative cash and time-deposit totals for customers without PAN.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap−5
Incentives40
Confidence60
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Under the Income-tax Rules, 2026, in force from 1 April 2026, Form 60 has been replaced by Form No. 97.

    ReportedSupportedSource: dev.to guideView cited source
  2. [2]

    Rule 159 lists 16 transactions where PAN must be quoted, and a Form 97 declaration is accepted for only six of them (serial numbers 11 to 16).

    ReportedSupportedSource: dev.to guideView cited source
  3. [3]

    For the ten transactions where no declaration is accepted, a person without PAN must apply for one.

    ReportedSupportedSource: dev.to guideView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. dev.to

    1 article · October 12, 2026

    The PAN Alternative, Its Form 97 Successor and What Lenders Must Verify

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

  • Income-tax Rules, 2026 (India)Follow
  • India PAN and KYC complianceFollow

Entities

Loading related stories