Skip to content

LeadershipNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher3 min readPublished Updated

New York City starts enforcing its rule that cancelling must be as simple as signing up

New York City can now fine companies $525 to $3,500 when cancelling a subscription is harder than signing up, under a rule in effect since October 1. Enforcement is already live, so checking the cancel path is this quarter's work for any company billing New Yorkers monthly.

The Board Room · Leadership desk

How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying New York City starts enforcing its rule that cancelling must be as simple as signing up
Generated illustration
Firms face $525 to $3,500 fines over hard cancellations What New York City's click-to-cancel rule requires of businesses and what it can cost them, and who cancellation roadblocks affect.

Cancelling must be as straightforward as signing up. Fines run from $525 for a first violation up to $3,500 for repeat offenses. Businesses may be required to reimburse affected consumers. Consumer advocates say roadblocks disproportionately affect older or less tech-savvy people.

Firms face $525 to $3,500 fines over hard cancellations
WhoHowKindClaim
Subscription sellersMust offer a cancellation process as straightforward as the sign-up processconstraint20
Rule violatorsFines from $525 for a first violation up to $3,500 for repeat offensescost3
BusinessesMay be required to reimburse affected consumers for unwanted servicesexposure4
Older, less tech-savvy peopleCancellation roadblocks disproportionately affect them, the Consumer Federation of America saysexposure12

What happened

  • The rule also requires companies to state subscription terms clearly and to explain customers' rights when they buy or cancel a membership.
  • DCWP Commissioner Sam Levine said a few hundred complaints were filed in the rule's first days, and about 6,000 New Yorkers visited the city's click-to-cancel site.
  • Levine said many complaints concern gyms, streaming services and newer, smaller subscriptions found on Instagram, such as shaving clubs and meal prep plans.
  • Veronica Yurovsky, a Brooklyn software engineer, filed a complaint with the department after trying several times to cancel her Spectrum Internet service.

Why it matters

  • exposure Companies with layered billing are exposed even when the core plan cancels online, because every recurring extra is another exit a customer can complain about.
  • cost Refund orders grow with the number of affected customers while fines are counted per violation, so a large biller's bigger risk is reimbursement.
  • decision Keeping a retention offer inside the cancel flow now has a fine and a refund attached, and NYSC has bet the other way, that an easy exit brings in sign-ups.

The rule's test is comparative. A cancellation process has to be as "straightforward" as the sign-up process [20], so each company is measured against its own funnel. A service that takes a card number on one web page has already set how simple its exit must be. Sam Levine, the commissioner of the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, ran into this as a customer when he could not cancel a meal prep subscription online [21]. "I got on the phone, they said, 'Are you sure? We can give you a discount. We want to send you more meals.' It's a huge pain," he said [8].

Optimum's spokesperson made the case for keeping a person on the line. "Each customer has different needs," the spokesperson said [11]. Bundles do vary. Alex Aminov, a Brooklyn software developer, tried to drop a landline that added $25 a month to his Optimum internet package, and calling was the only way to do it [9]. A representative talked him into moving the line to a mobile plan with promised discounts [9]. Later another representative said only some of the discounts applied, and a third called to ask why he was not using the number [10]. He is still not sure what is happening with his plans [10]. "In general, I would like to have an option to cancel anything online," he said [19].

In my view the fines alone are small next to what a retention call can keep. A first violation costs $525 [3]. That equals 21 months of the landline charge Aminov tried to drop [23]. Repeat offenses can reach $3,500, about 6.7 times the first fine [3][22]. The department can also require a business to reimburse affected consumers for services they did not want [4]. Business Insider's account does not say how the department counts a violation, whether per complaint or per practice.

New York Sports Club shows where compliance breaks down. Its parent company was sued by the New York State Attorney General for allegedly charging illegal fees and blocking membership cancellations [16]. The case ended in a settlement and bankruptcy [16]. The club put membership cancellation online in February 2025, when a state law requiring the option took effect [17]. Until October 1, members who wanted to stop personal training or a locker still had to go to the club or reach it by phone or email [18]. Kari Saitowitz, the club's chief marketing and creative officer, said it changed its process the day the city rule took effect [14]. "The easier you make it for somebody to cancel, we believe the easier you make it for them to sign up," she said [15].

For operators, the trade-off is retention revenue against fines and refunds. Emily Peterson-Cassin, director of competition and market fairness at the Consumer Federation of America, said cancellation hurdles fall hardest on people who are older or not as tech-savvy [12]. "We're tired of our time and annoyance being extracted in the same way as our money," she said [13]. This quarter's decision is whether a retention offer stays inside the cancel flow. Next quarter, a company that kept one will have to defend it against its own sign-up page whenever a New Yorker files a complaint [20][2].

What to watch

  • Whether the department's first penalties include reimbursement orders, and how large those orders are relative to the fines.
  • Whether early enforcement falls on large internet providers such as Spectrum or on the gyms, streaming services and small subscription sellers behind many of the first complaints.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence55
Adoption30
Hype gap+10
Incentives45
Confidence55
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Veronica Yurovsky, a 39-year-old software engineer in Brooklyn, has submitted a complaint to the DCWP after trying to cancel her Spectrum Internet service several times.

  2. [2]

    As of October 1st, New Yorkers can file complaints against businesses that make canceling subscriptions unnecessarily difficult.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Business InsiderView cited source
  3. [3]

    The city's Department of Consumer and Worker Protection will enforce fines ranging from $525 for the first violation to up to $3,500 for repeat offenses.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Business InsiderView cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. businessinsider.com

    1 article · October 9, 2026

    New York City is coming for companies that make it hard to cancel subscriptions

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Loading related stories