Product1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
Kratos and GE Aerospace's GEK800 is now the F143-ZZ-100, with an EMD contract to become a second propulsion source for JASSM rather than a replacement for the incumbent.
The Product Desk · Product desk

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
The Air Force has selected the F143 turbofan as a second-source engine for the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile, and the companies behind it say the engine received the U.S. Military Engine Type Designation F143-ZZ-100 on Monday, August 17, along with an Engineering, Manufacturing and Development contract [1][3][4]. The shape of that award is the story: according to the reporting, the contract positions the F143 as a second source for JASSM rather than replacing the missile's existing propulsion system outright [15].
That is a procurement decision, not a performance one. A second qualified engine does not make JASSM fly further or cost less by itself; it makes the program less hostage to one production line at a moment when demand for long-range weapons is rising [15]. The source frames the move as consistent with the Pentagon's push for affordable, mass-produced jet engines [5], which is a different objective from wringing another few percent out of an incumbent design.
The hardware is deliberately modest. The GEK800, developed by California-based Kratos Defense & Security Solutions and Ohio-based GE Aerospace, is an 800-pound-thrust (3.56-kilonewton) turbofan aimed at long-range missiles and other uncrewed applications [2][7]. Engineers began work in 2023 under a Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction phase that included engine testing, combining company investment with support and funding from the Air Force Research Laboratory [8][9]. The team has logged more than 50 engine starts in ground tests at its own facilities [10], and completed altitude testing at Purdue University's Maurice J. Zucrow Laboratories in October 2025, beginning in late September and finishing with tests of the engine's limits [11]. GE Aerospace vice president Mark Rettig said at the time that the joint team expanded the altitude envelope and identified the engine's rotor speed limits and compressive system boundaries [12]. From TMRR start to type designation, that is roughly two to three years [17].
The commercial logic is broader than one missile. The engine is also pitched at collaborative combat-type aircraft and other uncrewed aerial vehicles [13], and Kratos CEO Eric DeMarco said the companies are working with the Air Force to expand domestic jet engine production and investing with government partners to increase manufacturing capacity for drones, missiles and other systems [14]. Amy Gowder, who leads GE Aerospace Defense & Systems, called the designation and EMD award a test of the engine's performance and of the partnership with Kratos [6]. GE brings scale to that argument: an installed base of about 49,000 commercial and 29,000 military engines and roughly 53,000 employees [16].
What to watch: EMD is development, not a production award, so the near-term questions are qualification of the F143 on the JASSM airframe, whether the Air Force splits production quantities between sources or holds the second line as insurance, and what unit price the new line actually delivers. Also watch whether the capacity investments DeMarco described [14] show up as rate tooling rather than intent, and whether CCA and UAV programs adopt the same engine, which is what would make an 800-pound-thrust class engine cheap through volume.
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
The U.S. Air Force selected the F143 turbofan as a second-source engine for the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM), after the propulsion system completed altitude testing.
The engine also secured an Engineering, Manufacturing and Development (EMD) contract from the Air Force, to be developed as a second-source propulsion system for JASSM.
Amy Gowder, GE Aerospace Defense & Systems president and CEO, said the F143-ZZ-100 designation and EMD award are a testament to the strong performance and capability of the GEK800 engine and the strength of the partnership with Kratos.
Since the start, the team has completed more than 50 engine starts in ground tests at their facilities.
In October 2025 the companies completed altitude testing at Purdue University's Maurice J. Zucrow Laboratories; testing started in late September, progressed through altitude trials, and concluded with tests of the engine's limits.
Mark Rettig, GE Aerospace VP, said the joint team successfully expanded the altitude testing envelope and identified the engine's rotor speed limits and compressive system boundaries.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Single trade-press account of a company announcement
Every claim traces to one outlet retelling a Kratos/GE Aerospace announcement and press release. The concrete artifacts - a type designation, an EMD award, a completed altitude campaign - are specific and internally consistent, which lifts this above rumor, but there is no government confirmation, no contract number or value, no independent test data, and no second publisher to cross-check dates or scope.
Development-phase award, nothing fielded
Adoption so far consists of a type designation, an EMD contract, more than 50 ground starts, and one completed altitude campaign. That is real institutional traction inside an acquisition pipeline, but no production quantity, JASSM integration, qualification, or flight use is disclosed, so operational adoption is minimal.
Headline framing outruns a development-stage award
The source headline says the engine was 'selected for' the JASSM cruise missile, and the copy adds Pentagon mass-production framing plus GE's installed-base boilerplate, while the underlying event is a second-source EMD contract with no volumes, value, or qualification timeline. The body does correct the framing by stating the engine supplements rather than replaces the incumbent, which keeps the overstatement moderate.
Announcement sourced almost entirely to the beneficiaries
The narrative is built from a joint Kratos/GE Aerospace release and quotes from three company executives, all of whom benefit from signalling propulsion-franchise wins and domestic production expansion. The article closes with company promotional boilerplate. No adversarial or government voice is present to discipline the framing.
Plausible and specific, but uncorroborated
The event type, engine designation, thrust class, and test venue are concrete enough that the core facts are likely accurate, and the derived program timeline follows directly from the stated 2023 start. Confidence is held down by single-publisher sourcing, vendor-controlled framing, loose internal dating ('last year' for the October 2025 tests against an August 17 announcement), and the absence of contract terms.
product
The Air Force just published its shopping list of threat signatures it wants to shoot at cheaply1 distinct publisher
invest
Code Metal's $80M WarMatrix award shows OTA is where defense revenue now shows up1 distinct publisher
product
The Valkyrie's real test was the control handoff, not the flight1 distinct publisher
leadership
A sub-80% say-on-pay vote now buys a year of investor meetings1 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
1 article · August 17, 2026