ScienceNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished
Two Nebraska ranchers who voted for Trump object to his duty-free beef import plan
Nebraska ranchers who voted for Trump object to his 300,000-metric-ton duty-free beef import as steel and diesel costs rise, the BBC reported. The cost squeeze is documented in dollars, while the case for a political break rests on two interviews.
The Scientist · Science desk
Before-and-after figure: the price Jake Wolfinger gets for cattle at his feedlot near Lexington, Nebraska, fell from $240 per hundredweight to $225 per hundredweight. The BBC says this could mean a loss of hundreds of dollars a head.
| Measure | Value | As of | Claim |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earlier sale price | 240 $/hundredweight | 11 | |
| Price after the drop | 225 $/hundredweight | 11 |
What happened
- After an April wildfire, Yvette Mannon paid $4.89 a foot to replace fence on her Nebraska ranch, a bill above $300,000, with steel prices the BBC says tariffs heavily affected.
- She also needed a tractor out daily to deliver hay, with diesel up more than 40% from a year earlier because of the Iran War, the BBC reported.
- The August beef announcement landed just before the September-November window when most US calves are weaned and sold, and the cattle market tanked immediately, the BBC reported.
- Near Lexington, feedlot operator Jake Wolfinger saw the price he gets for cattle fall from $240 to $225 per hundredweight, a loss the BBC puts at potentially hundreds of dollars a head.
Why it matters
- contradiction Economist James Mitchell says cattle markets run in 10-12 year cycles and this one is clearly on a downswing, so the whole fall cannot be pinned on the import.
- exposure Republicans in a state that overwhelmingly backed Trump face independent Dan Osborn, whom the BBC describes as polling surprisingly well against Pete Ricketts in November's Senate race.
- constraint Relief announced by Trump and Governor Jim Pillen is aimed at fuel costs, so the steel and beef-price pressures the ranchers cite are not what it targets.
Wolfinger's $15 drop is 6.25% of his $240 price [16]. A loss of $200 a head, the smallest figure that counts as hundreds of dollars, would need an animal of about 1,333 pounds at that rate [11][17].
The fence numbers hang together. Thirteen miles of fence at $4.89 a foot comes to about $336,000 [15], against the more than $300,000 the BBC reported [1][2].
The beef import was announced in August as a way to lower consumer prices [4]. The BBC also lists the opening of the southern border to Mexican cattle among decisions that sent already-volatile markets into overdrive [14]. "All of this hit cattle markets, as a whole, negatively," said James Mitchell, an assistant professor and agricultural economist at the University of Arkansas [9]. A before-and-after pair from one feedlot cannot separate the import from the border decision or from the cycle Mitchell describes [10].
Mannon, 63, voted for Trump [6]. "It just felt like a betrayal," she said [7]. Wolfinger, 45, also voted for him and is unhappy with how the president has intervened in the beef market [12]. "People need to stay the hell out of farmers' business, because it's harvest time," Wolfinger said [13].
We think the account supports the cost squeeze well. The thing this doesn't tell you is how many ranchers share these two reactions: the BBC quotes two men who voted for Trump.
What to watch
- Published polling in the Osborn-Ricketts Senate race before November, to show whether 'surprisingly well' means a lead or a narrowing.
- Cattle price series across the September-November weaning window, with the August announcement date marked, to separate the import effect from the downswing.
- Whether the fuel relief from Trump and Governor Pillen reaches ranchers' diesel bills while the steel and beef-price pressures remain.
Clarity's read
What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.
Reality
- Evidence45
- Adoption
- Insufficient
- Hype gap+25
- Incentives
- Insufficient
- Confidence45
Claim ledger
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
- [1]
In April, a wildfire destroyed 1,600 grazing acres and 13 miles of fence on Nebraska rancher Yvette Mannon's ranch.
- [2]
Replacing the fence cost $4.89 a foot, for a total exceeding $300,000, with steel prices at their highest levels in years and, according to the BBC, heavily affected by tariffs imposed by Trump.
- [3]
Mannon needed a tractor out every day delivering hay to her cattle while diesel prices, spiking due to the Iran War, were up more than 40% from the previous year.
- [4]
In August the Trump administration announced it would import 300,000 metric tons of duty-free foreign beef in a bid to lower consumer prices.
- [5]
The August announcement hit right before the September-November window when most US calves are weaned and sold, and the cattle market tanked immediately.
- [7]
"It just felt like a betrayal," Mannon said.
- [8]
Both Trump and Nebraska Governor Jim Pillen have in recent weeks announced relief policies aimed at lowering fuel costs for farmers and ranchers.
- [9]
"All of this hit cattle markets, as a whole, negatively," said James Mitchell, an assistant professor and agricultural economist at the University of Arkansas.
- [10]
Mitchell said cattle markets run in 10-12 year cycles, with some good years and some bad, and that the market is now clearly on a downswing.
- [11]
Jake Wolfinger, who runs a feedlot near Lexington, Nebraska, was selling cattle for $240 per hundredweight and that has dropped to $225, which the BBC says means a loss of potentially hundreds of dollars a head.
- [12]
Wolfinger, 45, voted for Trump and is unhappy with the way the president has intervened in the beef market.
- [13]
"People need to stay the hell out of farmers' business, because it's harvest time," Wolfinger said.
- [14]
Decisions by the Trump administration, whether importing foreign beef or opening the southern border to Mexican cattle, have sent already-volatile markets into overdrive.
- [15]
Thirteen miles of fence at $4.89 a foot comes to about $335,650, consistent with a total above $300,000.
- [16]
A fall from $240 to $225 per hundredweight is $15, or 6.25% of the $240 price.
- [17]
At a $15 per hundredweight drop, a loss of $200 a head implies an animal of about 1,333 pounds.
- [18]
Dan Osborn, an independent candidate running against Trump-backed Republican Pete Ricketts, is performing surprisingly well in the polls ahead of November's Senate race, according to the BBC.
- [19]
Nebraska overwhelmingly backed President Trump in the last election.
Sources
1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.
- bbc.co.ukAmerican ranchers wrestle with soaring costs - and their loyalty to Trump
1 article · October 11, 2026
Topics and entities
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Topics
Entities
- BBCFollow
- Donald TrumpFollow
- Dan OsbornFollow
- Pete RickettsFollow
- Jim PillenFollow
- James MitchellFollow