Skip to content

Invest1 publisherNot yet confirmed elsewhere2 min readPublished

LINK's 24% rally came with 24 more new Ethereum wallets a day

Santiment counts new Ethereum LINK addresses up under 2% across a 24% rally that has since faded to about $13.35. That count covers one chain and mostly the weeks before CCIP 2.0, so it is an early, partial test of Chainlink's institutional push.

The Investor · Invest desk

How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying LINK's 24% rally came with 24 more new Ethereum wallets a day
Generated illustration

What happened

  • LINK lost 4.74% in a day and 7.09% in a week on CoinGecko's Oct. 7 snapshot, after touching $14.11 within the prior 24 hours.
  • CCIP 2.0 lets institutions and token issuers configure how cross-chain transfers are verified and executed, adding Cross-Chain Verifiers, custom fees and built-in compliance.
  • Users can opt into faster-than-finality transfers by setting different confirmation parameters, though full finality stays the default.
  • Santiment said Solana's new addresses rose 33% as SOL gained about 20%, while Ethereum's count was flat as ETH rose about 11%.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • contradiction Michael van de Poppe's view that LINK is building momentum on products with real users runs against Santiment's count, where new wallets grew at about a twelfth of the price's pace.
  • decision Anyone valuing LINK on institutional adoption has to find bridged and product-held balances elsewhere, because the published wallet figure stops at Ethereum mainnet.
  • exposure Andreou's $10-to-$12 support begins about 10% below $13.35, and losing it would bring his earlier $7-to-$8 base, 40% to 48% lower, back into view.

Santiment's daily average moved from 1,225 new Ethereum addresses to 1,249 [6], a gain of 24 wallets a day and about 670 over four weeks [17], while LINK's price rose to $13.96 on Oct. 6 from a Sept. 1 close of $11.22 [5]. Price outran new-wallet formation by roughly 12 to 1 [18].

That comparison is a test of CCIP 2.0, or rather mostly of the weeks before it. The launch came on Sept. 28 [3], so only nine of the 28 days in Santiment's latest window fall after it [19]. Scope is the larger gap. The count covers Ethereum mainnet only, and tokens bridged through CCIP or held through investment products are not in it [8]. Crypto.news notes that the data do not establish whether total LINK usage across supported networks rose or fell [9].

Chainlink's recent releases are aimed at financial institutions [16]. Fulcrum connects institutional financing workflows across public and private chains without taking custody of the assets [10]. An issuer setting its own verification and compliance rules has no evident need for a new LINK wallet on Ethereum mainnet, and Chainlink is putting its release effort into those controls [3] instead of anything built to grow a retail wallet count. How much institutional use turns into token demand depends on whether CCIP 2.0's customizable fees are paid in LINK, and the source does not say.

The first four-week window that starts after the launch is the cleaner test [6]. If it still shows about 1,250 new mainnet addresses a day [6], the case that the institutional news has not reached users gets stronger, at least on Ethereum. Mainnet could also stay flat while bridged or product-held LINK grows. Adoption would then be happening where Santiment is not counting [8]. Or institutions use the controls while holding little LINK, so wallet counts and price stay tied to trading flows even if the product works.

I think the slide to $13.35 [1] is mostly the September run cooling off. The counter-thesis is as defensible on this evidence: the rally ran on trading flows that never produced new wallets, and the launches have yet to put new buyers under the price. LINK is still about 19% above its Sept. 1 close [20], even after the past week's decline took roughly $760 million [21] off a market value near $10 billion [2]. RSI at 51.17 has fallen below its own average of 62.23 without reaching oversold levels [12], and price sits just under the Bollinger middle line at $13.66 [11].

What to watch

  • A weekly LINK close above $15 to $16 followed by a successful retest, the sequence Andreou says could put $20 to $23 into focus.
  • Whether LINK holds the lower Bollinger band near $12, the next technical area on the chart if selling continues.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories