Skip to content

Invest1 publisher2 min readPublished

Kalshi lines up sixty stock perps that would keep trading after Nasdaq closes

The Wall Street Journal says Kalshi has prepared to seek approval for roughly 60 perpetual futures on stocks and ETFs, traded around the clock. Citadel Securities says equity-linked perps belong with the SEC.

The Investor · Invest desk

Photograph accompanying Kalshi lines up sixty stock perps that would keep trading after Nasdaq closes
Photo: cryptonews.net

What happened

  • Kalshi has prepared to seek U.S. regulatory approval for roughly 60 perpetual futures linked to stocks and exchange-traded funds, including contracts on Tesla, Apple and Nvidia.
  • The Wall Street Journal reported on Sept. 10 that the prediction-market operator wants to offer those products around the clock, so a stock perp would keep trading after the equity market shuts.
  • Citadel Securities argues the contracts belong under SEC oversight with stocks and listed options, and warns that continuous equity derivatives could create surveillance gaps during closures and halts.
  • The CFTC approved Kalshi's BTCPERP contract on May 29, one day after the company submitted it, and the regulator said perps linked to different asset types may require individual assessment.
  • Kalshi has not published a product list, leverage limits, margin requirements or a launch timetable, and the report identified no filing for the equity contracts.

Compiled by The InvestorSomething wrong?How this is made

Why it matters

  • decision The CFTC has to decide whether its asset-class caveat means one review of a stock-perp template or sixty reviews of sixty reference assets, and the answer sets how quickly any venue can list equity derivatives by submission.
  • precedent CME Group's challenge to the Bitcoin approval shows the loser of a classification argument goes to a judge, so a CFTC blessing of stock perps would only start the fight.
  • capability If the contracts clear, U.S. traders get leveraged, non-expiring single-stock exposure onshore and inside a regulated venue, without routing to offshore crypto exchanges for it.
  • exposure Leverage lets a holder control more than the posted collateral and adverse moves force liquidation, so until margin terms are filed nobody outside Kalshi can size what a weekend gap does to those positions.

A perpetual future has to reference something every hour it trades. The funding payment is what does the tracking: when the contract sits above the reference price, longs commonly pay shorts, and the direction can reverse when it trades below [8]. At 2am on a Sunday there is no Nasdaq print for a Tesla contract to reference, because the stock trades in established exchange sessions with only limited extended-hours activity [12]. Kalshi has not said how prices would be calculated while the primary stock market is closed, and it has not said how splits, dividends, mergers or trading suspensions would be processed [10].

Before any of this lists, Kalshi has to establish the reference price, the funding mechanism and the corporate-action procedures [9]. None of the contracts would carry ownership, voting rights or dividends, and no company has endorsed a Kalshi contract linked to its shares [17].

The earlier extensions of the perp book went to gold and silver, with a West Texas Intermediate contract pursued after that [14]. Futures generally sit with the CFTC and securities with the SEC [15], so those were listings where the classification question did not arise. Sixty contracts on stocks and ETFs means sixty reference assets inside the market the SEC oversees [19], and pursuing them spends Kalshi's regulatory and legal capacity on that asset class while it defends the Bitcoin approval against CME Group in federal court [6].

The CFTC can treat a single-stock perp as a future and assess it on its reference asset; its own caveat about different asset types points that way [7]. The SEC can assert that a contract tracking Apple belongs with Apple options, which is the position Citadel Securities has taken [3]. Or a judge settles the classification, in the Bitcoin case or a successor to it, since the dispute already involves all four parties [18].

My read is that the binding constraint here is operational and not jurisdictional. Whichever agency ends up with these products, someone has to approve a price for hours when the underlying does not trade, and a funding rule that survives a weekend [9][10]. The counter is decent: Kalshi submitted a Bitcoin perp and had it approved the next day [16], then added metals [14]. That is the record of a firm that has found classification to be the only real gate. If the equity contracts list with a published methodology and the SEC stays quiet, the counter is right.

What to watch

  • An actual submission, with the leverage limits, margin requirements and reference-price methodology attached. That converts a reported intention into a reviewable filing.
  • The CME Group case against the BTCPERP approval in federal court, since a ruling on classification would reach the equity contracts too.
  • Any public SEC position on equity-linked perpetual futures as a class, instead of contract by contract.
Loading claim ledger
Loading source directory links
Loading share composer
Loading topic controls
Loading related stories