Build1 publisher3 min readPublished
Heat rejection caps Google's first orbital TPU satellite at 15-minute compute bursts
Google's first orbital TPU satellite can run its chips for only about 15 minutes before its radiators catch up, Ars Technica reports. Power is the easy part in orbit, so radiator area decides how many chips each satellite can carry.
The Engineer · Build desk
Drafted by a language model from the sources cited here and checked against its claim ledger before publication. How we use AISend a correction

What happened
- MVP, a fridge-sized satellite built with Planet and carrying four TPUs, launches October 1 on SpaceX's Transporter-18 rideshare for a test meant to last a few months.
- The satellite gets about one kilowatt of solar power, roughly the draw of a hair dryer.
- Google flew ahead of its original plan for two custom satellites in 2027 by building on a spacecraft Planet had already made for an early test.
- Heat travels from the chips through a thermal interface material and aluminium and copper heat pipes to a radiator, a path Google tested in a thermal vacuum chamber.
- In Google's November 2025 paper, memory irregularities first appeared at 2 krad(Si), roughly triple the dose a shielded chip takes over five years, and no hard failures showed up through 15 krad.
Compiled by The EngineerSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- constraint Any job placed on MVP-class hardware has to survive a shutdown roughly every quarter hour, so continuous workloads wait for satellites that can shed their full heat load.
- cost Whoever builds orbital compute pays for radiator area in proportion to heat load, so money spent raising radiator temperature buys more capacity than money spent on extra solar.
- decision Planning an orbital cluster the size of a ground pod means planning for many spacecraft, since Google expects only dozens of TPUs per future satellite.
The cold of deep space, about minus 270 degrees Celsius, barely helps [6]. In a vacuum there is no air or water to carry heat off a chip. Heat leaves only as infrared light from a radiator [5]. The Stefan-Boltzmann law, P = e*sigma*T^4, sets the rate, and a perfect radiator at about 300 K sheds roughly 460 watts per square metre per side [5]. The limit depends on the radiator's own temperature [6].
The International Space Station is the working reference. NASA says its external active thermal control system is "designed to provide 35 kW of heat rejection per loop for a total capability of 70 kW" [7]. It uses two rotating wings of three panels, each panel 23.3 by 3.4 metres [8]. Together the six panels have about 475 square metres of face [1]. The station rejects about 147 watts per square metre of it, roughly a third of the ideal one-side figure [2].
Scale up to a ground pod. Google's Ironwood scales to 9,216 liquid-cooled chips spanning nearly 10 MW [9]. A dev.to analysis of the launch puts that at about 140 space stations' worth of radiators [10]. Its script gives roughly 21,800 square metres of perfect radiator at 300 K, and it ignores absorbed sunlight and Earth's infrared [10]. At the station's achieved density, the pod would need about 68,000 square metres [3]. Hotter radiators shrink that fast, because output grows with the fourth power of temperature [11].
MVP's budget is small enough to check by hand. Shedding a full kilowatt continuously takes about 2.2 square metres of ideal radiator at 300 K, or about 6.8 square metres at ISS density [4]. Ars Technica, citing The New York Times, reports that the cooling runs in "brief spurts of about 15 minutes" before the TPUs shut down [2]. A run that has to stop so the radiators can catch up means the chips make heat faster than the radiator sheds it while they compute [2]. The published accounts do not give MVP's radiator area, the TPUs' power draw, or the idle time between bursts.
The satellite's name, MVP, is accurate [4]. Its spacecraft was one Planet had already built for an earlier test [14]. The 15-minute figure therefore describes how that bus handles four TPUs. For the number to transfer to the custom satellites, their radiator area per watt of TPU draw would have to match MVP's. I'd expect a bus designed around the chips to run longer. On this evidence, cooling is what limits MVP. That evidence is one secondhand report about one borrowed spacecraft [2].
Power is the easy side. Google says a panel in the right orbit sees near-constant sunlight and makes up to eight times more power than on Earth [16]. Its launch post calls cooling orbital data centers "a crucial research challenge" [1]. Travis Beals, who announced the launch, wrote that Google is "launching a prototype satellite to evaluate how Google Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) perform in space" [13].
What to watch
- Google or Planet publishing MVP's radiator area, TPU power draw or idle time between bursts, the figures needed to check the 15-minute duty cycle against the heat budget.
- Burst length on Google's purpose-built satellites, the hardware its original 2027 plan called for.
- On-orbit memory errors on MVP compared with the 2 krad(Si) threshold in Google's November 2025 radiation paper.