Product1 distinct publisher3 min readUpdated
No one has been sued. The filings still seek login IPs, linked Google and Xbox accounts, device identifiers and cloud files tied to users of several Discord servers since June 1.
The Product Desk · Product desk

Compiled by The Product DeskSomething wrong?How this is made
Take-Two Interactive has asked a federal court in New York to issue DMCA subpoenas compelling Microsoft and Discord to hand over records that could identify whoever is behind the recent Grand Theft Auto 6 leaks [1]. Two separate requests were filed on August 20, one directed at Microsoft and one at Discord, with a return date of September 4 [2][4] - roughly two weeks after filing [21].
The important detail is not the franchise. It is that this is not a lawsuit against anyone. Take-Two is not accusing Microsoft or Discord of involvement; it is using a process under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act that lets copyright owners request information identifying someone suspected of sharing their material without permission [5]. Neither filing publicly names the person behind the leaks, and including a Discord server in the request is not an accusation against that server's owner or its members [12].
What the filings ask for is broad. Take-Two is seeking IP addresses, phone numbers, linked Google and Xbox accounts, device identifiers, Microsoft telemetry and relevant OneDrive files connected to accounts that may be tied to the Cyberleek persona [3]. The Microsoft request also covers users who may have communicated in several Discord servers connected to the leaks since June 1, including their email addresses, phone numbers and login IP addresses [8] - a lookback window of roughly 80 days before the filing date [22]. Beyond identity, Take-Two wants device IDs, records showing whether particular files or programs appeared on those devices, and GTA, Rockstar or Cyberleek files stored in OneDrive [9]. It has additionally asked Microsoft for internal business and investigative records relating to what the filing describes as Microsoft's own investigation of Cyberleek [7].
The Discord filing names Cyberleek alongside two other accounts, CinematicRockstar and Surfer24k, and lists cyberleek_west and surwest as replacement names for Surfer24k [10]. It reaches the Odyssey.gg and Odyssey communities and a server used by editors for the GTA YouTuber Matthew "DarkViperAU" Judge [11]. Exhibits show the wider effort: the Microsoft filing lists a "Github DMCA Notice," and the Discord filing includes earlier takedown notices sent to Discord [13].
Read as a product document rather than a legal one, this is an inventory of what a consumer platform retains. Login IPs and linked accounts are ordinary subscriber data. Telemetry showing which programs touched a device, and the contents of a user's cloud drive, are a different category, and they are being requested through the same instrument. Every logging and sync feature shipped for support or convenience becomes a discovery target the moment a rightsholder points at an account.
Context on the underlying leak: the clips began appearing on August 18 from an account called CyberLeek [15], the persona used the attention to promote a meme coin [14], and Rockstar responded with DMCA claims [16]. A GTAForums user, Vice Cit, reported the account moved crypto through KuCoin and had taken in around $50,000 with roughly $391,000 in unsold tokens [17], arguing that because the exchange requires KYC verification, a subpoena there would yield the account holder's identity and transaction and session records [18].
What to watch: whether the court confirms the subpoenas issued at all, since at publication it had not publicly done so and neither company had responded [6]; whether Microsoft or Discord contests the scope, particularly the OneDrive and telemetry items [9]; and whether the server-wide request since June 1 is narrowed [8]. CyberLeek had not posted since August 20 but claimed more footage was coming [19]. Rockstar had issued no statement and was still planning its extended GTA 6 segment on Netflix for August 27 [20].
Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.
Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.
Take-Two Interactive has asked a New York federal court to issue DMCA subpoenas requiring Microsoft and Discord to turn over extensive records that could identify the person or group behind the recent GTA 6 leaks.
Take-Two filed two requests in a New York federal court on August 20, one aimed at Microsoft and another at Discord.
Take-Two is seeking IP addresses, phone numbers, linked Google and Xbox accounts, device identifiers, Microsoft telemetry, and relevant OneDrive files connected to accounts that may be tied to the Cyberleek persona.
The Microsoft request and Discord request ask both companies to hand over information that could help identify the person behind the leaks by September 4.
At the time of publication, the court had not publicly confirmed that either subpoena had been approved or sent out, and neither Microsoft nor Discord had filed a response in the two proceedings.
The Microsoft filing asks for information on users who may have communicated in several Discord servers connected to the leaks since June 1, including email addresses, phone numbers, login IP addresses and any linked Google or Xbox accounts.
Evidence-backed comparisons of source perspectives and observed adoption signals. Read the methodology
Which Builder, Operator, and Investor concerns the observed source mix emphasized—not a truth score.
Evidence, demonstrated adoption, hype gap, incentives, and confidence are assessed independently, each on its own current evidence. How these are measured.
Detailed filing description, single outlet, no docket corroboration
The core factual spine is specific and internally consistent at document level: filing date, two targets, return date, quoted request language, named personas and servers, exhibit list. That specificity is characteristic of someone reading the filings. But it rests on one publisher with no case numbers or docket links supplied, no comment from Take-Two, Microsoft or Discord, and no second outlet in the cluster. The crypto-proceeds strand is materially weaker, resting on a single pseudonymous forum poster's self-reported tracing.
Filed and pending; nothing produced or adjudicated
Real-world traction is limited to the act of filing. Two requests exist with a September 4 return date, but the court had not publicly confirmed approval or issuance, neither platform had responded on the docket, and no records had been handed over. The only completed enforcement actions in the sources are ordinary takedowns - Rockstar's DMCA claims on the clips, prior notices to Discord, and one GitHub notice - not compelled disclosure.
Filings piece restrained; sleuthing piece runs ahead of proof
Slightly overstated overall, driven by one strand rather than the whole cluster. The subpoena article is notably disciplined - it states this is not a lawsuit, that no court confirmation exists, that no infringer is named, and that server inclusion is not an accusation. The companion piece pushes further than its evidence, headlining imminent exposure of the leaker on the basis of a forum user's wallet tracing and a hypothetical KuCoin subpoena that no source shows anyone has sought. Net effect is a modest positive gap.
Monetized leak persona, attention-driven coverage, self-citing publisher
Incentives are visible on every side and evidenced in the sources. The leak persona monetized the attention directly through a meme coin, with token proceeds reported by a community analyst, giving it reason to keep publishing and claim more footage is pending. The community sleuth gains standing from being first to trace the wallet. The cluster is single-publisher in a high-traffic GTA 6 news cycle, and the second article explicitly cites the outlet's own earlier reporting as its provenance for the meme coin angle. Take-Two's own incentive to identify the leaker is the plain purpose of the filings.
Procedural core credible; outcome and verification open
Moderate confidence. The procedural facts are specific, self-limiting and unlikely to be fabricated, which supports the story's central assertion about what Take-Two is asking for. Confidence is held down by the absence of any second publisher, any docket citation, any statement from the three companies involved, and any court action - plus a clearly weaker crypto strand mixed into the same cluster. Whether the subpoenas issue, and how much of the requested telemetry and cloud data is ever produced, remains entirely unresolved in the supplied material.
product
Cyberleek dumped GTA 6 footage nine days early, with a memecoin attached and no provenance2 distinct publishers
build
Grok 4.6 lands in Copilot two days after launch, and the model picker becomes a procurement problem1 distinct publisher
product
The AI-wrote-it claim died in eight hours. The Actions injection pattern did not.1 distinct publisher
invest
Cursor ships Origin to paying users as GitHub's outage count reaches 2571 distinct publisher
Distinct publishers with included, body-backed reporting in this cluster.
2 articles · August 21, 2026