Skip to content

LeadershipNot yet confirmed elsewhere1 publisher2 min readPublished

Foreign Affairs essay argues AI's promise is what inflates its market bubble

Foreign Affairs says roughly 30% of Americans use AI less than four years after ChatGPT, five times the share for earlier technologies at comparable stages. The essay treats that speed as fuel for a market bubble, pointing to ten AI stocks that supplied around half of this year's S&P 500 returns.

The Board Room · Leadership desk

How we use AISend a correction

Photograph accompanying Foreign Affairs essay argues AI's promise is what inflates its market bubble
Photo: stlouisfed.org
AI outpaces earlier technologies in use and revenue US AI use against earlier technologies at comparable stages, and AI company revenue against early digital tech, per a Foreign Affairs essay.

Per a Foreign Affairs essay: roughly 30% of Americans use AI less than four years after ChatGPT; about 6% used smartphones, the Internet or electricity at comparable stages; AI company revenue is three times what earlier digital technologies made early on.

AI outpaces earlier technologies in use and revenue
FigureValueNoteClaim
Americans using AI, roughly, under four years after ChatGPT30%13
Share for earlier technologies at comparable stages, about6%smartphones, Internet, electricity7
AI company revenue vs. earlier digital tech's early years3 timesvs. Internet, cloud, early mobile apps14

What happened

  • AI company revenue is three times what the Internet, cloud computing and early mobile apps earned in their early years, according to the essay.
  • Steam engines and electricity did not reach their full potential until railways, highways and power grids were completed decades later.
  • Policymakers, investors and business leaders are counting on AI as a cure for runaway public debt and the costs of aging populations, the essay says.
  • A 2018 study by researchers at Texas Tech, Texas A&M and the Vlerick Business School found that the most revolutionary innovations of two centuries each inflated a market bubble.

Why it matters

  • contradiction The 30 percent figure is the optimists' best datum and the essay's stated cause for concern, so adoption alone cannot settle which side is right.
  • exposure A crack would reach economies that supply AI builders. China is the essay's example: net exports, mainly of AI-related goods, are a third of its growth.
  • decision If the weakest players are wiped out and survivors consolidate, a buyer signing a multi-year AI contract this quarter is choosing a vendor without knowing which group it will fall into.

Speed of adoption and speed of payoff are separate questions, and the essay uses history to answer the second. Business computers appeared in the 1950s and gave no visible lift to the economy until the Internet connected them in the 1990s [2]. The adoption figure implies earlier technologies stood near 6 percent at the same stage [7]. The essay also supplies the best objection to its own analogy. Commercial AI arrived when the overwhelming majority of humans already had a computer or smartphone [6]. If missing infrastructure is what delayed earlier payoffs, that device base is a reason to expect a shorter wait this time.

The investment argument concerns prices, and the essay separates prices from the technology. Its general rule is stated flatly: "Major technology revolutions have always triggered dramatic boom-bust cycles." [10] The author says the innovations of the current boom are real and the hype is born of genuine promise [12]. The next sentence is the thesis: "That promise, however, is exactly what is inflating the bubble." [9] A bubble and a real payoff can coexist. The 2018 finding the essay cites describes stock prices rising and then falling [8]. It speaks to what investors paid.

The payoff side is harder to size than the adoption side. The essay gives revenue as a multiple of what earlier digital technologies earned in their early years [14]. It gives US spending as "hundreds of billions of dollars" of Big Tech investment [5]. One is a ratio and the other a loose range, so no payback period can be computed from the essay's figures. Revenue is also not profit, and the passages on adoption and revenue do not include profit or productivity numbers.

Timing is the open item. The essay says the mania will crack "as it inevitably will" and that the shock will ripple through financial markets into a global economy increasingly dependent on AI for growth [15]. We do not know whether the crack falls inside a given budget year, and the answer changes what a company should sign.

In our view the essay documents fast use and elevated prices, and it concedes the technology is real. The payoff case it describes as shaky rests on historical delay and market concentration.

What to watch

  • A dated forecast, or profit and productivity figures for AI firms, that would let revenue be set against the 'hundreds of billions of dollars' of investment.
  • Whether the ten AI stocks keep supplying around half of the S&P 500's returns.
  • China's share of growth coming from AI-related net exports, now a third by the essay's count.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence40
Adoption60
Hype gap
Insufficient
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence40
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    Steam engines and electricity did not realize their full potential before the completion of railways, highways, and power grids decades later.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Foreign Affairs essay 'The Global AI Bust'View cited source
  2. [2]

    Computers for business use emerged in the 1950s but gave no visible lift to the economy before the Internet connected them in the 1990s.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Foreign Affairs essay 'The Global AI Bust'View cited source
  3. [3]

    The top ten stocks in the S&P 500 are all big AI players and together account for nearly 40 percent of the index and around half of its returns this year.

    ReportedSupportedSource: Foreign Affairs essay 'The Global AI Bust'View cited source

Sources

1 independent publisher whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. foreignaffairs.com

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    The Global AI Bust

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Topics

Loading related stories