Skip to content

InvestIndependently confirmed4 publishers2 min readPublished Updated

ENS Labs would hand its DAO every ENSv2 admin key under a draft that closes ENSv1 to new .eth names

ENS Labs posted a draft DAO proposal on October 11 to stop new .eth registrations on ENSv1 and activate ENSv2 on Ethereum mainnet. Existing owners could renew on v1 with no deadline, and the DAO would receive every ENSv2 admin role.

The Investor · Invest desk

How we use AISend a correction

Illustration accompanying ENS Labs would hand its DAO every ENSv2 admin key under a draft that closes ENSv1 to new .eth names
Generated illustration
ENSv2 gives expired names a shorter renewal window Days an owner has after a .eth name expires to renew it, on the current v1 registrar versus ENSv2.

Before and after chart of the renewal grace period after a name expires: ENSv1 allows 90 days, ENSv2 allows 28 days, a decrease.

ENSv2 gives expired names a shorter renewal window
MeasureValueAs ofClaim
ENSv1 grace period to renew90 days13
ENSv2 grace period to renew28 days13

What happened

  • Before v2 opens for registrations and resolution, ENS Labs would run a pre-migration sync meant to preserve every active v1 name for its current owner.
  • ENS Labs plans to publish scripts that let anyone verify onchain where the ENSv2 administrative roles sit.
  • In February 2026 ENS Labs said it would build ENSv2 only on Ethereum mainnet and stop work on Namechain.

Why it matters

  • decision DAO voters get one vote covering the v1 freeze, the v2 activation and the admin handover together, so objections to any single part have to be raised in forum feedback before it.
  • exposure Once the roles move, the DAO is the party responsible for every future ENSv2 change, with ENS Labs' privileged positions removed.
  • constraint Apps and resolvers must keep supporting both registrars for the foreseeable future, because v1 names can renew indefinitely.
  • cost Fees tied to new .eth registrations would move to v2 once it launches, leaving v1 with renewals only.

The design makes v1 a closed pool. After activation no new .eth name can be registered there [2], renewals of existing names run through ETHRenewerV1 with no cutoff date [4], and the one way out is expiry, at which point the name becomes available for registration on v2 [5]. The v1 count can fall and cannot rise. We think the fee base moves to v2 by attrition, or rather by lapse. That is slower than a deadline would make it and cheaper to run: with no cutoff, ENS Labs has no migration date to police [4].

ENS Labs has one chain left to build for. In February 2026 it announced that ENSv2 would be developed only on Ethereum mainnet and that work on Namechain would stop, citing higher gas limits and much lower registration costs [17].

The plain reading could fail in a few places. Crypto Briefing notes that the pre-migration sync must run without errors: if v1 ownership and v2 records disagree anywhere, confidence in the new system would suffer [15]. The draft could change: community feedback and any revisions from ENS Labs come before the vote [9], and a revision that added a cutoff date would end the attrition argument above. Owners could also simply stay. The renewal grace period is 28 days on v2 against 90 on v1 [13], a gap of 62 days [19], and we'd expect an owner who values the longer window to keep renewing on v1 for as long as the proposal allows.

The report does not give a vote date, fee levels, or the point in the lapse window at which an expired name opens on v2. Until the vote passes, v1 registrations continue as usual [12].

What to watch

  • Forum feedback and any ENS Labs revisions to the draft, in particular whether a v1 cutoff date is added.
  • The DAO vote date and result, since v1 registrations continue as usual until it passes.
  • Results of the pre-migration sync, specifically any mismatch between v1 ownership and v2 records.

Clarity's read

What the record supports and how the coverage leans. The claims behind it follow.

Reality

Evidence62
Adoption
Insufficient
Hype gap+8
Incentives
Insufficient
Confidence70

Perspective Coverage

4 publishers
Builder
Builder 31%
Operator
Operator 38%
Investor
Investor 31%
Why these scores

Claim ledger

Ranked by verification strength, evidence, and original report placement.

  1. [1]

    On October 11, 2026, the team behind the Ethereum Name Service posted a draft proposal to the ENS DAO Governance Forum.

  2. [2]

    The draft proposal would activate ENSv2 on Ethereum mainnet and stop new .eth registrations on the current v1 registrar.

  3. [3]

    Existing owners would keep their names and could renew them on v1 with no deadline to move.

Sources

4 independent publishers whose own reporting we read for this story.

  1. cointelegraph.com

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    ENS seeks DAO approval to activate upgraded Ethereum naming system
  2. crypto.news

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    ENS seeks approval for major .eth domain upgrade
  3. cryptobriefing.com

    1 article · October 12, 2026

    ENS Labs proposes ENSv2 activation that would halt new ENSv1 registrations
  4. cryptoslate.com

    1 article · October 13, 2026

    Ethereum Name Service plans major .eth overhaul with one irreversible catch for domain holders

Share your take

Let Clarity write the post for you.

Signed-in readers get a short post drafted on this story in the register they choose — narrative, analytical, or a direct position — editable to the last word before it goes anywhere. The share buttons at the top of this story work without an account.

Topics and entities

Follow any of these and your For You feed starts watching them — no settings page required.

Entities

Loading related stories