Science4 publishers3 min readPublished Updated
Arecoline in ice-age teeth pushes habitual drug use back before farming on Sulawesi
A Griffith University team found the alkaloid arecoline in two sets of grooved prehistoric teeth from Sulawesi and showed that sucking a whole betel nut releases enough of it to act on human receptors, from a sample of two people.
The Scientist · Science desk

What happened
- A study published in Science Advances on 9 September attributes deep tooth grooves in two prehistoric hunter-gatherers from the Indonesian island of Sulawesi to habitual sucking of whole betel nuts.
- The older of the two was a man who died aged between about 40 and 50 and lived between 25,000 and 16,000 years ago, around the coldest part of the last ice age, though Sulawesi itself carried no ice.
- To test the mechanism, the team soaked nuts in artificial saliva and applied the broth to cloned human receptors expressed in frog egg cells, finding that intact nuts release enough arecoline to alter brain function.
- Separate biochemical analysis detected arecoline in the dental tissues of both foragers, linking the wear pattern to the drug rather than to some other hard object in the mouth.
- The finding places betel nut use up to 25,000 years ago, against previously suggested Neolithic or Bronze Age origins of roughly 3,500 years ago.
Compiled by The ScientistSomething wrong?How this is made
Why it matters
- capability The rounded groove gives bioarchaeologists a wear signature they can screen existing skeletal collections for, which matters because areca seeds themselves almost never survive in the ground.
- constraint The marker only shows up in mature, heavy users by the team's own account, so it can date the behaviour but cannot yield an estimate of how many people on the island were doing it.
- contradiction Live Science has plain sucking producing only a numb mouth, while the team's assay is reported as altering brain function, and the difference decides whether this is the origin of a drug habit or of a folk anaesthetic.
- precedent If detecting an alkaloid in dental tissue holds up, the fermentation-first story of drug origins becomes an argument about what preserves rather than about what people did, and other pre-Neolithic candidates get reopened.
The word doing the work in this study is "habitual", and wear is what carries it rather than any tally of users. In one of the two individuals the grooves deepened over a lifetime until they opened the tooth's pulp cavity [10], and nerve exposure of that kind would have been severely painful, according to Adam Brumm, who led the work at Griffith University with colleagues there and Indonesian archaeologists from the University of Hasanuddin and BRIN [9][5]. Specialists in prehistoric dental wear sent images of the first find had not seen the pattern before [23].
The dating deserves the same care as the wear. The older specimen, a jaw fragment with three teeth recovered from a cave at Maros-Pangkep about ten years ago [22], falls between 25,000 and 16,000 years old [2]. That is a 9,000-year window in which 25,000 is the ceiling and not the measurement [28]. The pre-farming argument survives the young end of it anyway: even at 16,000 years, this man precedes both the 13,000-year-old barley beer in Israel that anchors the current fermentation-first account of drug origins [15] and the roughly 12,500-year-old start of Fertile Crescent agriculture that Brumm cites [16][30].
The second individual, dated to between 7,600 and 6,300 years ago [3], follows the first by at least 8,400 years and possibly by 18,700 [29]. Two points that far apart show the behaviour recurring on one island, not a tradition running unbroken between them, and the team's own reconstruction has the modern slaked-lime quid arriving only in the Neolithic, about 4,000 years ago on Sulawesi, as a by-product of adding lime to pottery clay [13]. Betel is, on Brumm's account, the fourth most widely used psychoactive substance in the world today [26].
On motive, the team notes that arecoline is a natural analgesic and that foragers on the island had generally poor teeth [19]; New Scientist reports Brumm's view that people began sucking the nuts for toothache, became addicted, and worsened their teeth in the process [20]. The grooves cannot arbitrate that order. They record abrasion by a hard, roughly spherical object moved back and forth in the mouth [9], which fits decay preceding the habit as readily as the reverse.
The chemistry is what shifts the prior assumption, since arecoline release was thought to depend on slaked lime converting the alkaloid into a free base [12]. Soaking whole nuts in artificial saliva and applying the broth to cloned human receptors expressed in frog egg cells showed release sufficient for a physiological effect with no lime involved [6], and Matheson's biochemical analysis then found arecoline in the dental tissues [7]. What that pairing does not give you is a dose in a living mouth, or any measure of the experience; the nearest thing to that on record is Brumm rolling a whole nut around his own mouth and reporting a bitter astringency that left it numb [21].
What survives the caveats is narrow and worth having. Two people on Sulawesi, thousands of years apart, put an arecoline-bearing seed in their mouths often enough to wear through their own teeth, and the older of them did so before the Neolithic reached either Sulawesi or the Fertile Crescent [16].
What to watch
- Whether the same rounded grooves appear in other curated tooth collections from Sulawesi and island Southeast Asia, which would turn two individuals into a prevalence figure.
- Whether the second individual's sex and age get settled in print: Live Science reports the sex as undetermined, while New Scientist describes a middle-aged or older man.
- Whether independent labs detect arecoline in prehistoric dental tissue elsewhere, which would test the method rather than this one site.